there is an article in the telegraph today (cant link it paywall) claiming that it is lord Pannick (gina miller's barrister) who is the brains behind the letwin amendment. this makes a lot of sense because letwin never struck me as shape enough to come up something as smart as this.
Enzokk wrote: » Because legally the courts see the referendum as advisory, no matter what the politicians say. They could stop Brexit tomorrow and nobody could take them to court to have them implement the result because it was advisory only. I know, politicians are treating it as binding but legally it isn't, up is down and black is white. That is another reason why Cameron will go down as the worst PM ever, because he made such a hash of the referendum he allowed the chaos of the last 3 years and May and Johnson to be leaders. He owns it all, and the sickening thing is other than very few voices in his own party and UKIP, nobody was even thinking about the EU.
Igotadose wrote: » Interesting, but so what? The amendment's been approved. Gina Miller's team has played chess versus seagull checkers played by HMG.
farmchoice wrote: » ya a post of no great import i just found it interesting, i suppose it highlights the kind of brains working behind the scenes on this on the remain side. when the history of this come s to be written, this i feel will be the story. how against all the odds a collection of sharp legal minds, Millar, grieve, Benn, Cherry and some others managed to thwart Brexit. And how on the other side a collection of ideological MP's got so hamstrung by their position they managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.......and of course the DUP
Igotadose wrote: » If there'd been some sharp political minds campaigning for Remain, we'd have had this sorted long ago. Once the 2017 GE was done, it was clear to me there was an opportunity for strong Remain leadership to undo the clusterf*ck.
DUP - See what they come up with in the UK
trellheim wrote: » Since the EU let them have a little bit of compromise, to the DUP mind it stands to reason a little push will get them what they want.
Purgative wrote: » Just listened to a DUP MP on Pat Kenny. Now I can take or leave Kenny but he seemed really on the ball today. PK - Surely with a border down the Irish Sea you'd be as well choosing Remain. DUP - Didn't work so well for Greece and Portugal has really high unemployment. PK - But we're not Portugal or Greece. DUP - No we'll see what they come up with. PK - Go back to the EU? (Incredulous) DUP - See what they come up with in the UK FFS more unicorns
devnull wrote: » https://twitter.com/DKShrewsbury/status/1185990368795463680 Tory MP Daniel Kawczynski colluding with foreign government and undermining sovereignty again.
Pheonix10 wrote: » Sorry to hijack the thread but can anyone advise what is the most likely outcome now? Another extension? Referendum? Or just bill passed and Brexit goes ahead on 31st Oct.
VinLieger wrote: » So they should have another election bringing the count to 2 since they had the referendum and making it the 3rd election fought with Brexit being a core issue but the idea of holding a 2nd referendum is somehow unreasonable? The level of hypocrisy by anyone pushing this farcical argument is just astounding. The people voted for brexit by the narrowest of margins and then voted for a parliament unable to implement it again by the narrowest of margins, that's a pretty clear message that the people don't know what they really want and should be asked directly again.
Strazdas wrote: » Support for the EU is actually very strong in Portugal and Greece. This guy has obviously been reading Daily Telegraph opinion pieces.
ThunbergsAreGo wrote: » And what if remains wins by the narrowest of margins? Do we go again,?
Zubeneschamali wrote: » Extension. Johnson has requested it, the EU are considering it. There isn't time for the HoC to scrutinize and pass all the associated legislation by Oct 31st - the Government have been hiding the draft legislation for over a year, it is guaranteed to be absolutely horrible when it is published, and will be debated and amended for weeks. The Euro parliament also needs to approve the deal, and will take a minimum of a few weeks. Jan 31st is probably reasonable if everyone thinks the deal as proposed is OK, but I strongly doubt that, and an election or new referendum are quite likely before any deal is done.
Pheonix10 wrote: » Thanks! So in short. Nothing has really been resolved. It will probably go into late next year before anything is done?
Water John wrote: » Even Kuenssberg doesn't think Bercow will allow a second WA vote today.https://twitter.com/bbclaurak
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » Westminster is such an archaic place. They need a serious overhaul to bring basic processes in their parliament in to the 21st century.
Joe_ Public wrote: » Looks very unlikely for sure but will end up feeding into the gov narrative of parliament frustrating the will of the people again so in a way the tories might see it as win-win territory.
BREAKING: MLAs have been turned away from Stormont by security staff as their passes are over 2 and half years out of date.