Indestructable wrote: » What will the EU make of the UK coming back looking for an extension without even having the vote on the deal? I think it's a bit absurd tbh, plenty in the EU have reservations about an extension anyway. Will it be seen as more bollocksology by the UK?
Joe_ Public wrote: » Isnt the idea of the letwin amendment that extra time would be needed to frame required legislation so eu almost certainly be on board for it. Its not intended as a vehicle to stop brexit in any way.
Gintonious wrote: » https://twitter.com/dempster7/status/1185297459137990656 This sounds worrying.
Stacksofwacks wrote: » They wanted Brexit, now they are getting it.
kingbhome wrote: » All jokes aside on that page, some poor Catholics will be getting slayed history shows us this
Water John wrote: » They can have the Letwin vote and if he wins, they can still hold a substantive vote on the main issue. However, it would be indicative and not binding. Johnson may do that if he thought he had the numbers.
Enzokk wrote: » True, but extra scrutiny will bear the plans of Johnson in the transition period and if he has promised the ERG no-deal to get their votes he loses the Labour MPs and the Tory rebels. On the other hand if he promises an extension to avoid no-deal he loses the ERG.
Indestructable wrote: » Another point, I follow this thread religiously and everyone who does will be well clued in to the going ons in the Brexit world. Maybe 20 percent of the population here and in the UK know what is going on inside out, to the other 80 percent they turn off the news or the radio at the mention of the word Brexit. Now, the 80 percent were probably delighted to hear the deal was agreed this week and said thank fu*k for that, it's nearly over (the end of the beginning, at least). Tomorrow, with the passing of the Letwin amendment it drags on for probably another 3 months. Generally, people do not want this to happen. They are so so fed up of it all by now. I'd imagine the vast majority in the UK will not have a Scooby Doo what the Letwin amendment is this evening or how it affects the vote tomorrow.
Strazdas wrote: » Civil disobedience doesn't mean violence though : more likely to be street demos, sit ins, blockades etc (if it ever comes to pass).
votecounts wrote: » If only there was a Police Force to prevent this sort of behaviour, I hope they hit them as hard as they would do if this was a protest by nationalists, even a few arrests of some unionist politicians for inciting hatred wouldn't go a miss.
Junkyard Tom wrote: » Somehow I doubt this will be the Ulster Workers' Council strike 2.0twitter.com/dempster7
Tomorrow is potentially one of the most momentous days in unionist political history. A vote in favour of Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal will fundamentally reshape Northern Ireland’s place in the UK, in economic terms at least. The Northern Irish economy will be, in terms of rules at least, as closely aligned to the rest of Ireland and the EU. A border poll would at some point follow to seek constitutional as well as economic unification. However, a vote against the Prime Minister’s deal may mean that Brexit might never happen — to the relief, ironically, of those who until this week may have been unionist Brexiteers.
Johnny Dogs wrote: » So the loyalists are remainers now, yeah?
Joe_ Public wrote: » I think they might actually be though theyd never admit it.