Joe_ Public wrote: » Tories think they can compete for Labour seats in the North. "Bolsover over Guildford", is a slogan I've seen, meaning they'll abandon a lot of their seats down south and target ones they believe they can win. Sounds risky to me but that's what they believe. Labour will still fight like dogs to keep their old base, wouldn't write them off completely.
Mr.Nice Guy wrote: » If he fails to get the numbers and an election follows, I could see Labour getting hammered as Johnson positions himself as the dealmaker thwarted by an intransigent parliament.
prawnsambo wrote: » No veto. It has to be a majority in Stormont.
Frosty Perception wrote: » i think you are mistaken in portraying it like BJ did this gleefully. i doubt that. more like "it is nothing personal Arlene. just politics."
Enzokk wrote: » Labour will need a strong manifesto, and they have the past 9 years of Tory Government to use as well. Will people really be happy to give the keys back to the same people that has made their lives hell and admit austerity wasn't really needed?
ToBeFrank123 wrote: » Are the UUP much different to the DUP when it comes to the Irish sea border?
ArmaniJeanss wrote: » This is nonsense and not a chance of this happening. Labour will hold the bulk of their seats in 'their areas' like the North East or Welsh ex-mining towns. Voting for Brexit against the wishes of Labour was one thing, but these constituencies are generations away from actually voting Tory. And on the other side of the Pennines the leave voting suburb constituencies of Liverpool are just not going to ever vote for Boris.
joseywhales wrote: » I found it funny listening to the channel 4 interview with that real ira guy a couple of weeks back. He was giving some rhetoric on the rep of Ireland political parties having capitilist agendas in a derogatory way. As he continues to live his crap life, causing problems for scores of innocent families and in the end it is the capatilist agenda that will achieve his goals that he will never be able to affect, despite the pain and suffering he created.
lightspeed wrote: » Im confused why nothing is being mentioned of tarrifs even with a deal? it seems the brits will definately want a zero tarrif deal and worries that Angela Merkel at behest of german auto industry will push for the same. If they get zero tariff deal it hard to see how they not having their cake and eating it? What the point of staying in EU if you can trade within EU tarrif free and have control over immigration etc and no longer have to pay into EU budget?
Mr.Nice Guy wrote: » Barnier has done a great job and has kept his dignity throughout despite the provocation from disrespectful Brexiters. When this is all done and dusted he deserves a lot of thanks from the EU 27, especially ourselves. Not sure he'll be able to book himself a vacation any time soon though as Westminster may keep the circus going a little longer.
joseywhales wrote: » My belief is that they would have to pay for market access the same as the other European ,non EU countries on the periphery. They will pay in some way.
Tangatagamadda Chaddabinga Bonga Bungo wrote: » What are the chances the Northern Ireland assembly voting for a hard border in the future? If Stormant is up and running. Is there a Unionist majority vote there?
Hurrache wrote: » Johnson seems relieved during his press conference anyway.
lightspeed wrote: » perhaps by allowing EU members access to british fishing waters in exchange for tariff free deal. im at a loss why the EU facilitated a deal at all. if they had of refused to negotiate any futher it would have ended with another referendum and most likely they would have chosen to remain. They passed the benn act in britain ensuring a no deal wasnt going to pass so there woukd have been no other outcome other than new referendum. That would be EU interests so why did they not seek to make a deal? Seems Brits were right that the germans and french would be willing to negotaite to ensure access to the british market.