Yeah_Right wrote: » Loved that game. The week before my phone was hopping during the second half as every Paddy I'd ever met decided to get in touch. During that match, silence ðŸ˜
The Rape of Lucretia wrote: » Which prompts the question : how good is Ryan really. His starting place, and importance to the team is not in question. However, while he came with great trumpeting, and took superbly, and immediately, to international level rugby, at a young age, where does he really rank today as an international 2nd row? Today, not the potential he might reach in another 5 years at his pick. I'm not sure. Would he make the NZ, SA, or English starting teams? I think not. So very good and all as he is, is he of the level that can give reasonable expectations he is a plus for us against those top teams? I'm kinda thinking not. Were we dazzled by the duck to water transition to high level rugby and the evident potential, and remarkable opening win streak? How would he compare with Paulie even?
sydthebeat wrote: » 100% There are a couple of locks from the USA, Uruguay and Tongan teams I'd have in there ahead of him at this stage.... A bit of a one trick pony and I think he's been found out on international stage... We need someone who's above international standard to replace paulie
Niallof9 wrote: » He's the rugby players player. Watch the game with any proper rugby man
kingofthekong wrote: » The no.1 problem is if we do manage to beat new zealand it will be a blood and guts effort .....which means were gonna be deflated against an England team who in my opinion are gonna absolutely pump Australia
aloooof wrote: » This is going to end well....
Deleted User wrote: » Well look who made an NZ rwc team...https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/rugby-world-cup/rwc-2019-japan/116622723/three-all-blacks-in-the-rugby-world-cup-team-of-the-pool-stages
pc7 wrote: » I have to agree, I think Ryan is one of our most important players, he is unbelievable and its scary how young he is.
The Rape of Lucretia wrote: » Importance and scarily young, don't necessarily add up to being a serious threat to the top teams. Of course our best chance is with him playing. No dispute on that. My point is, what does this tell us about our chances, if despite that, he is still a level below those he will be competing against in the key games.
evil_seed wrote: » Are we doing predictions? Here's mine. It'll be a tight game. We're going to drag NZ into an arm wrestle of a game. We'll end up chasing the game around the 65 min mark and NZ will run up a margin of 16 points or so. The final score will flatter NZ but won't represent how close the game was
Newuseruntaken wrote: » I think NZ will get a couple of quick tries and it will be game over in the first 20 mins
sydthebeat wrote: » let me know if you want a phone stream link
Henry Ford III wrote: » I believe everyone is fit, and there will be no surprise selections.
davo2001 wrote: » It'll be interesting to see if Joe chooses Kearney or Larmour at 15. Personally I'd like to see Larmour get the nod, I think he bring an extra level or unpredictability which we will need to beat the All Blacks.
johnnyskeleton wrote: » Really has to be Kearney for this match doesn't it? Larmour is great at attacking, unpredictable and has a better chance of line breaks etc, but Kearney really can't be beaten in terms of his intelligent defensive cover. Plus, Larmour and Carberry on the bench means two utility backs. Luke McGrath coming on for Kearney against Japan caused some confusion in the last 10 minutes which, IMO, meant they weren't able to effectively regroup.
Professor Genius wrote: » If we are to stand any hope it should really be Sexton and 10 and Carbery at 15