nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Waggle your 'Joystick' - Post your 3Dmark Scores here

MarkAnthony

For the craic!

Which one will we use, is there a free one which can post results. It should be a link as I don't trust any of you lot! :pac:

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

TitianGerm

TitianGerm wrote: »

Finally got around to running Time Spy again. Will be installing my new 2060 over the weekend so i'll re-run and post the results then.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/33179826?

So I installed my new RTX 2060 and ran Time Spy again tonight and saw quite a jump compared to the 1060.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/33264222?

1060 = 4499
2060 = 7550

That is nearly a 68% increase in scores and way more than I expected.

OmegaRed

wotzgoingon wrote: »

What is your system specs?

RAM : 8GB-Kit Corsair DDR3 PC1600 C9 Classic
CPU: Intel Core i5-2500K Box, LGA1155
MoBo: MSI P67A-GD55 (B3), Intel P67, ATX, DDR3
GPU: Royal King 7950

wotzgoingon

OmegaRed wrote: »

RAM : 8GB-Kit Corsair DDR3 PC1600 C9 Classic
CPU: Intel Core i5-2500K Box, LGA1155
MoBo: MSI P67A-GD55 (B3), Intel P67, ATX, DDR3
GPU: Royal King 7950

How stable is the overclock as the hanging at system specs only ever happened me if I had a unstable overclock just for benchmark purposes.

OmegaRed

wotzgoingon wrote: »

How stable is the overclock as the hanging at system specs only ever happened me if I had a unstable overclock just for benchmark purposes.

I thought it was pretty stable, even turned it down a notch. I'll reset to default and work my way up from there.

TerrorFirmer

Nice. Now...get rid of those 970s!

wotzgoingon

Ran a bench just now.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/38613032?

Also when on this page I noticed TerrorFirmer's name above is odd. looks like he closed his account. He contributed good stuff over the years.

.G.

wotzgoingon wrote: »

Ran a bench just now.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/38613032?

Also when on this page I noticed TerrorFirmer's name above is odd. looks like he closed his account. He contributed good stuff over the years.

Hope not, he's a good lad, be a big loss to the community. Last active 5th August.

K.O.Kiki

Firestrike 1.1: 18'606
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/38615386?

Time Spy 1.0: 7'432
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/38615555?

My historical results:

Benchmark | CPU | GPU | Score
Fire Strike | E3-1231 v3|GTX 970 | 10'562
Fire Strike | E3-1231 v3 | GTX 980 Ti | 14'227
Fire Strike | i7-5820K | GTX 1080 | 18'606
Time Spy | E3-1231 v3|GTX 980 Ti | 5'494
Time Spy | i7-5820K | GTX 1080 | 7'432

jayo26

My own score on new build.

Amd 2600 cpu
Msi b450 gaming plus mobo
2x 8gb g.skill 3000
Gigabyte radeon rx 5700xt gpu
Evga supernova 650 g1 plus psu
Samsung 970evo plus nvme M.2 ssd
Samsung 860qvo 1tb ssd.

wotzgoingon

I got a new 5700 XT so ran a bench of Timespy. Totally forgot to run Firestrike, maybe another day.

Timespy: 8806

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/8535433

jayo26

wotzgoingon wrote: »

I got a new 5700 XT so ran a bench of Timespy. Totally forgot to run Firestrike, maybe another day.

Timespy: 8806

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/8535433

What model 5700xt have you got mate? Intresting it's that bit higher then mine.

wotzgoingon

I used morepowertool to get a bit more out of it.

I only just got the card today in my Parcel Motel box in Galway and only got home late in the evening. I will push it a bit more another day but saying that I had a good few crashes trying to find a sweet spot.

jayo26

wotzgoingon wrote: »

I used morepowertool to get a bit more out of it.

I only just got the card today in my Parcel Motel box in Galway and only got home late in the evening. I will push it a bit more another day but saying that I had a good few crashes trying to find a sweet spot.

Ahh ok it probably not worth the hassle doing it then is it? for general gaming Use you won't notice much difference surely.

wotzgoingon

jayo26 wrote: »

Ahh ok it probably not worth the hassle doing it then is it? for general gaming Use you won't notice much difference surely.

No I wouldn't bother pushing a card that hard for a gaming session tbh.

Venom

Upgraded to a 2070 Super as my 1070 was starting to show it's age at 1440p.

Timespy: 9839

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/8688733

TitianGerm

Venom wrote: »

Upgraded to a 2070 Super as my 1070 was starting to show it's age at 1440p.

Timespy: 9839

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/8688733

How come your RAM is only running at 2394?

Venom

TitianGerm wrote: »

How come your RAM is only running at 2394?

When I flashed the motherboard bios to the latest version I must not have set it. To be honest, the Crosshair VII was a nightmare for months by needing the CMOS to be cleared before it would boot, the latest bios sorted that out but broke mouse control in the bios and since it was working at last, I just left it alone.

TitianGerm

Venom wrote: »

When I flashed the motherboard bios to the latest version I must not have set it. To be honest, the Crosshair VII was a nightmare for months by needing the CMOS to be cleared before it would boot, the latest bios sorted that out but broke mouse control in the bios and since it was working at last, I just left it alone.

I've a 2060 and a 1700 so your results are nice to see. Look to be about 20-30% better than my last test.

Venom

TitianGerm wrote: »

I've a 2060 and a 1700 so your results are nice to see. Look to be about 20-30% better than my last test.

I reckon with a more stable board (should have gone Gigabyte) I could hit 10k in Timespy, but my current system apart from the ram issue is rock solid now and super quiet, so happy to quit while I'm ahead

cherryghost

My timespy result with default GPU clocks, 3600mhz RAM

wotzgoingon

I see my amazon order arrived in Dublin today so should have it Monday and my overclockers order will hopefully be here at least Tuesday and Komplett hopefully Tuesday as well. I can't wait to put it together.

Hopefully I get a good bit of silicon and can get good scores.

wotzgoingon

Ryzen 7 3700X and Rx 5700 XT

Timespy: 9938

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/8733627

cherryghost

wotzgoingon wrote: »

Ryzen 7 3700X and Rx 5700 XT

Timespy: 9938

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/8733627

Overclocked CPU with latest AGESA bios?

wotzgoingon

cherryghost wrote: »

Overclocked CPU with latest AGESA bios?

Yea, latest bios ABBA. And a manual overclock to 4.4 but the bclk is not running at 100 so overclock is a bit lower than 4.4Ghz.

wotzgoingon

New score.

Timespy: 10157

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/8745432

mp3guy

9900K + 2080 Ti

Timespy: 12392

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/39875875

wotzgoingon

New Score with a 3700X clocked at 4.39GHz and Rx 5700 XT @ 2178MHz on core and 1840MHz on memory

Graphics score is 9988, hopefully some day I break the 10000, don't ask how I can do that with a reference design card.

Timespy score: 10177

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/8757520

Doge

Does anyone know what score a Commodore 64 would get in 3DMark?

Plenty of joystick waggling with that PC...

K.O.Kiki

Doge wrote: »

Does anyone know what score a Commodore 64 would get in 3DMark?

Yes.

0/DNF because C64 is not x86-software compatible

z0oT

A Time Spy result I just got.

3700X & 5700 XT both @ stock.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/40128118?