Jimmy Garlic wrote: » Nah pal, they would never sniff the wind and nod along with whatever their paymasters want for a cosy life. They are infallible superhumans and incredibly virtuous, just like priests were back in the day.
Jimmy Garlic wrote: » slogans given to them by their Marxist/NGO handlers
jackboy wrote: » What do you think most of the protesting students did for the weekend after the school strike. Most of them consumed like demons and continue to do so. Greta is traveling around with a team of handlers consuming resources unnecessarily. Her UN speech could have been done at home with modern technology. She is all for other people to give up economic growth and live frugally but not her or her family. Did she ask her mother to stop her book being published, which will destroy many trees?
Ulysses Gaze wrote: » When I walk through my locality on a Saturday morning you know what I see? A bunch of middle aged and older people cleaning rubbish off of the green there, rubbish out of hedges and footpaths as well. Tending to the plants etc. You know what I don't see? Younger people doing the same. This all starts at local level. And not just joining a one-off protest now and then. Words without Action = Bull****.
Tell me how wrote: » Is that article the bible from which all those against Greta are now taking their lead? Might want to say that to those including the aussie guy in the video above who have all basically implied they should shut up and come back when they are adults. I am glad to see that you yourself are now posting links to guidelines which are in line with what Greta has proposed given that they are contained within the article.That is significant progress.
Tell me how wrote: » You could use the same argument suggesting a climate change advocating scientist is driving to work is a hypocrite and it would be equally false.
Tell me how wrote: » So the scientists are making stuff up are they?
gozunda wrote: » Hyperbole lol? The article (which you haven't read evidently) simply details as an example how kids can make a difference even whilst holding whichever opinions they choose. Interstingly the "Aussie guy" said much the same. Bizarre you seem to have missed that. I do love the 'greta' this and 'greta' the 'greta' the other! Seriously is it possible to produce a comment that does not reference the little red book of the sayings of greta? Eitherway something seems to have changed your mind - we have now moved from "greta tells us to listen to the scientists" to the "guidelines which are in line with what Greta has proposed". Thanks for that
gozunda wrote: » The scientists are not saying civilisation ends in 10 years. But you know that already...
Tell me how wrote: » Have you yourself not pointed out the name of the thread title several times already.....We can do this whichever way you want. You will have to be consistent though so maybe that's too big an ask.
Tell me how wrote: » I do, and you know that my position is the frame of reference is a moot point in this given the situation. If a mechanic told you your car was going to all apart in around 10,000 miles. Would you expect that he was accurate to the stated milage?Would you drive it for 9,800 or try to get it sorted immediately?
gozunda wrote: » Indeed. I think you will find the thread details opinions as to gretas voyage to the new world. The constant repetition of 'greta is great' etc. Is kinda outside those terms of reference to be fair
Tell me how wrote: » gozunda wrote: » The scientists are not saying civilisation ends in 10 years. But you know that already... I do, and you know that my position is the frame of reference is a moot point in this given the situation. If a mechanic told you your car was going to fall apart in around 10,000 miles. Would you expect that he was accurate to the stated milage? Would you drive it for 9,800 or try to get it sorted immediately?
PostWoke wrote: » Pampered? Have you ever tried protesting? She's given up a lot, even with all the middle aged men baying for her head on a spike. Didn't she sail across a bloody massive ocean? Pampered? You just sound jealous that she's accomplished something. As to your point about skipping school, it makes me imagine a class of kids sitting dutifully in a shell of a school building in the middle of a post-apocalyptic desert Get your priorities straight. Hundreds of Irish kids go on the mitch every day and just go knacker drinking.
Tell me how wrote: » I agree with you in terms of those who do participate in community initiatives are generally older people. It has always been that way. This doesn't start at a local level either, it has to start at a national policy level.
Ulysses Gaze wrote: » Responsible citizenry starts at local level though.
Jeff2 wrote: » I think both this girl and the Malala girl were used by people and didn't know it
Overheal wrote: » That's hard to prove; if you want to do X, and A B and C also want to do X and help you with that objective are you used?
KyussB wrote: » When something can only adequately be tackled at a macroeconomic level, rather than an indiividual/local level, then it is the macroeconomic issues that must be prioritzed far above individual/local issues. Posters criticizing Greta for alleged hypocrisy, have already highlighted how impractical it is to achieve individual perfection on climate/environmental issues, due to the impracticality of avoiding carbon-emitting transport, communications devices manufactured in China with all sorts of rare earths etc. - thus making it impossible for anyone to focus on macroeconomic issues, if they try to prioritize perfection on individual/local issues first, due to setting themselves a goal that is impossible in todays economic system. Ironically these posters don't see how pointing out those impracticalities, actually undermines their own argument about hypocrisy - since it just proves the point that prioritizing the macro level issues, while putting far less importance on invdividual issues in comparison, is the only practical way to go if people want to mount an actual proportionate response to arrest climate change.
Jeff2 wrote: » Yes, by being dragged around the world to do that at a young age.
Stevieluvsye wrote: » Just home off holidays and listened to that mad fcuk. All I heard was how dare I for basically living. She needs mental health treatment very soon
Overheal wrote: » that's shifting the argument: in which you aren't dragged to X because like A B and C you also want to go to and do X....
Deleted User wrote: » you'd almost begin to think that gretas statements dont hold up under their own weight, the way that those in thrall carry on.
So is the kid only "guilty" of having a sh1t eating grin?
Still looks like a smarmy little twat if you ask me!
I think it can be said without any shadow of a doubt that anyone wearing a MAGA hat is an asshole of the highest order.
Supporting the guy means they share his racist sexist values.
If, considering they were marching themselves elsewhere in the city, they behaved like like that towards a peaceful march that they had no business getting involved in, I'd be equal parts fuming and terribly upset with both my child and the adults who should have been in charge of their students.
You seem weirdly confident that the true facts are being hidden and when revealed, will actually show that the apparently racist asshole kids will be shown to be more sinned against than sinning.
Meanwhile his mother has made a statement.. Clearly racism runs in family.
the kid look like a douche, he was being a douche.
Maybe you should ask the School board and the diocese why they are already sure that the fault was with the students and not the elderly native american man.
Veritas Libertas wrote: » All this talk of fixes on the macroscopic level; is it any wonder there were accusations of communism earlier in the thread? People drive markets, we as buyers and sellers. For us to make a difference to climate change we must demand it. It's not some invisible hand/force, we need to take responsibility for our habits. That's why Greta and her hysterical ilk are hypocrites if they fly around in jet planes. They use the fruits of capitalism while at the same time advocate against it. The height of hypocrisy.
While I was preoccupied with other things, the US left settled on a pair of competing climate change narratives. By the time I looked, the choice was down to just these two, and no other views could be considered. View #1, Green Abundance, is that combating climate change means unleashing the power of renewable energy. Fortunately, according to this story, renewables are already the cheapest way to go, or if not quite, they will be once they are scaled up through a massive infusion of public investment. <snip>. . . . . </snip> View #2, Righteous Austerity, is that the root cause of the ecological crisis is capitalism’s incessant drive to expand, which has fostered the toxic ideology of economic growth. We can’t have endless growth on a finite planet, so growth has to end right now.source
Released from importunate reality—which they would henceforth blithely dismiss as inconsequential—the faithful could return to the roots of their fanaticism. They felt free at last to restore socialism to its primordial state: Utopia.source
The fight against the climate change isn't just an innocent activity of some altruists who want to protect Nature and living conditions on Earth. Sadly, it is a very dangerous ideology in which the scientific truth and Nature stand at the very last place of priorities. The climate alarmism is one of the main components of the current left-wing progressivism and its main weapon in the attacks against the Western capitalist society whose radical transformation is the goal. While the fight against climate change is used as an excuse, we are witnessing a salami method applied by the international organizations, a global network of NGOs, media, and collaborationist politicians in the whole world that enforces bans and orders whose goal is to make the people subject to the government control and global governance. <snip>. . . . . . . . </snip> Most of the public is still disdainfully calm. It is only observing the fearmongers' stunts from a distance and with quite some indifference. The vision that someone could ban us from driving the car to the cottage for the weekend isn't emerging in anyone's mind. Business insiders have known for quite some time that they can make nice profits out of the climate hysteria while they don't need to be afraid of the merciless markets. It's enough to secure the access to subsidies and lobby for the beneficial regulations. The public will pay for everything. The big business is an ally of the progressivists. In the circles of the younger elites, the idea is being deliberately propagated that it is not only in but it also pays well to support the progressive Left. It pays well to someone. It is an atmosphere resembling the years before the Second World War and the arrival of the new totalitarian system after the war. The generational shift is very helpful for that transformation – especially the departure of the generation that has had a direct experience with the communist totalitarian system. We face a tangible risk that the history will repeat itself.source
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/b1a8522b26abe4367117071263a70671.svg)
