Jack1985 wrote: » Exactly and Europe is basically slot restricted everywhere so one little delay as above, snowballs. Looks like the TA delays have now been dealt with when GAJ gets back tomorrow on the 146 it'll have just shy of 4 hours before it does the 125 and similarly as result of a long planned turnaround in Boston for the 137, LAX which was severely delayed to Toronto last night will make it up this afternoon over there.
steokeogh wrote: » That is not necessarily true. You have, in the eyes of US immigration, entered the US. Which mean they do have to record that you didn't fly and be de-cleared. On the Irish immigration side I am not sure of the process. Also flights that leave from the CBP area are deemed sterile and sealed once the door has been closed. So yes Irish law applies but the CBP legislation allow this situation to happen. Kind of come back to the hours that CBP operates. Hypothetically, should there be an amendment added that there must be a CBP presence until all flights to the US have passed the point of no return.
Marcusm wrote: » You have been pre-cleared to enter the US, nothing more. The limited powers granted to CBP officers relate to those carrying or suspected of carrying a weapon and those whom they have seen committing an offence. Their powers of detention are limited to holding the suspect until they can be surrendered to AGS. Otherwise, their powers are persuasive; follow my orders or I will blacklist you. It is all Irish soil, it is not the same as a foreign embassy.
Locker10a wrote: » I was flying out this afternoon, we taxied out to the east runway, 11 aircraft were ahead of us, ended up taking off exactly 1 hour behind schedule. I was looking at a lot of the aircraft on Flightradar, many seem to have left dublin on time this morning but are 15-30 mins late landing back, guessing due to slots
Locker10a wrote: » Passengers can and do get off US flights after boarding in Dublin, it’s happened for sick pax and disruptive pax in the past. There’s absolutely nothing to suggest people were being held captive during that delay, the most reasonable and logical reason people didn’t get off is because they needed to get home/to their destination, and couldn’t afford to just forfeit their ticket just because of the inconvenience
tricky D wrote: » Just after 1pm and just after 9pm, add 8 hours = 16. /had an eye on it most of the way
LXFlyer wrote: » I think it is important to point out that scheduled departure times are the times that the doors are scheduled to close on the departure stand, and the scheduled arrival time is the time that the doors are scheduled to open at the arrival airport. They are not the take off or landing times as the schedules take into account taxiing times at both airports (which for example at Istanbul and Madrid can be very lengthy), and have allowances built in for potential delays. Therefore looking at FR24 you are comparing apples with oranges as the the schedule and actual times quoted are completely two different timings. There is no scheduled take-off or landing time in the public schedules. A fairer opening statement would have been that your flight took off 1 hour after the scheduled departure time off stand. That does indicate a delay, but not an hour. The schedule would allow for taxiing time within that period, and you would have eaten into the delay allowance built into the schedule, but it’s important to note that the flight didn’t take off exactly 1 hour behind schedule as you suggest. Scheduled sector times have gotten longer over the years to allow for delays on the ground for whatever reason - a comparison of airline timetables from years ago and today will tell you that. I might sound like I’m nitpicking, but the two sets of times are completely different.
billy few mates wrote: » I was on a US flight that was cancelled after a long delay a few months ago, I asked the boarding agent what this would mean seeing as we had technically temporarily been admitted to the USA out of curiosity really. She told me that as it was quite late all the CBP staff had gone home so someone had done some sort of a mass signout for all of us. She then led us all up to the baggage hall where we collected our bags and left. We turned up the next day and the CBP agent sympathised with us saying 'oh you were on the cancelled flight yesterday" and stamped the passports and sent us on our way. I had thought there might be a problem if someone had an entry stamp without an accompanying exit stamp but it wasn't a problem.
goingnowhere wrote: » 10 has less capacity than 28 due the runway exit layout, so if 10 is in use you get delays
Stephen Strange wrote: » No exit stamps for the US anyway, it's all done digitally these days.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Eh what ?! 10 has the same capacity see daa/CAR and Helios reports. It’s the longer taxi only. I’ll do the work for you. “ Runway and airspace capacity The analysis shows that the maximum achievable runway throughput on Runway 10-28 is 24 arrivals in arrivals mode, 41 departures in departures mode and 48 flights in mixed mode (assuming S18 design day fleet mix).”https://www.aviationreg.ie/_fileupload/Helios%20capacity%20assessment%20workstream%202/P2410D008_Final_Report_v1_5_1%20(clean).pdf Page 4
Kcormahs wrote: » Will Aer Lingus announce any routes mid september as per the last two years?
sherology wrote: » EI-LRC looks ready to roll...https://aibfamily.flights/A320/8965#
sherology wrote: » Strange Montréal hasn't been re-announced now that the LRs are starting to come on-stream (and there's a bit more clarity - I assume). Earlier they launch, earlier you can get bookings... Any chance the bookings were poor last year prior to cancelling route?
kevinandrew wrote: » Surprised to see how far ahead this one is, was expecting EI-LRB to make an appearance first. Maybe both will be delivered around the same time?
HTCOne wrote: » I remember reading that forward bookings were actually very strong on YUL. TATL total traffic/movements have started to shrink year-on-year over the last few months for the first time in over 10 years. The demise of WOW and the MAX are factors in this, but there's signs of an impending recession in the US and in Europe. Maybe EI are getting nervous. Who knows.
Tenger wrote: » In regard to US security; Fast pass works for the airport security. The US security is under the auspices of the US TSA. You can apply for their Global Entry program which allows faster processing. I would expect an announcement within the next month. I doubt we will see a significant new route, other than a reinstatement of the Montreal route. Looking at their planned aircraft deliveries; the LRs will replace B757s. (2 in Shannon, 2 in Dublin) 2 new A330s from Toulouse will allow winter maintenance and add frequency to Seattle, San Francisco and perhaps Florida next summer. The additional 4 A321LRs (anyone got a potential delivery time?) may allow a new East Coast route or perhaps a double daily A321LR will free up an A330 to head further West?
HTCOne wrote: » SEA daily, MCO 6 x weekly, SFO 10 x weekly and MIA back to 3 x weekly are what I've heard from EI crew, so that's an extra 8 A330 daily movements if true, which would imply no 330 leaving of course, and would leave 6 330 weekly movements unaccounted for if no 330 leaves, not accounting for 4 extra LRs
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w5.vanillicon.com/v2/5fffda8352925b36d6f8503d7ddaac66.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/87cad23dda173a0a8750aa00b4e86d4a.svg)
