Pa ElGrande wrote: » It is Asperger’s Syndrome, I have a post on this thread with video on the subject in girls. Once you have some background on what Aspergers is, how Greta is acting begins to make sense.Empathy and Asperger’s Syndrome https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TajItoz3ftI
Blueshoe wrote: » First time I actually heard her or saw her on video. Didn't realise that she also has downs syndrome. She seems like a fairly steadfast youngster tough. I'd be cautious as to who her support team are. They will end up finding a way to use her and profit from it. We all know it's going to happen. I would expect to be seeing pictures of her looking rough on tabloid news sites when she is older. Headings like "former child activist hits new low" or something similar. Her parents need to watch out for her.
Blueshoe wrote: » Didn't realise that she also has downs syndrome.
Stevieluvsye wrote: » Hadn’t seen that. Interesting and confirms everything I read up about this crackpot. She looks demonic
Blueshoe wrote: » Stevieluvsye wrote: » Hadn’t seen that. Interesting and confirms everything I read up about this crackpot. She looks demonic First time I actually heard her or saw her on video. Didn't realise that she also has downs syndrome. She seems like a fairly steadfast youngster tough. I'd be cautious as to who her support team are. They will end up finding a way to use her and profit from it. We all know it's going to happen. I would expect to be seeing pictures of her looking rough on tabloid news sites when she is older. Headings like "former child activist hits new low" or something similar. Her parents need to watch out for her.
Pa ElGrande wrote: » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpSQuc69R9c
gozunda wrote: » This article lays out the relevant issues with any faffing around ...https://medium.com/@daniilgor/the-real-problem-with-greta-thunberg-29326c3addd5
Centurion1001 wrote: » I can understand trying to encourage kids to be more mindful of the environment but this putting the fear of God into them is way too far
We've really seen that with Greta Thunberg because anyone who raises criticisms either of her or the politics which she's representing … can find themselves being called anti-Greta, a child hater, someone who doesn't take young people seriously,"
Stevieluvsye wrote: » The young lad asked me to take him out of school next year to focus on climate change. Ye no worries chief, sure why bother going back at all, this is a long term project
Centurion1001 wrote: » One thing I find amazing though is how all the kids demonstrations about climate change have fizzled out through the summer holidays. You'd think it'd be a perfect time for protests what with all the free time they have...
Jimmy Garlic wrote: » The Club of Rome and the rest of her elitist backers have no problem using children to drive home their propaganda points. The powers that shouldn't be have used that tactic for centuries, everyone from the King of France who backed a "children's crusade" to Jerusalem, to Adolf Hitler and Chairman Mao have used children as one of the cores of their propaganda. The idea is if they heavily brainwash the youth thhey can use them to hammer down the rest of society down the line. Children were denouncing, snitching on and literally killing their own parents during the so called cultural revolution in China.
Centurion1001 wrote: » Yes but then she wouldn't get to posture to the peasants.
SafeSurfer wrote: » How do you know what Greta’s carbon footprint is? You do realise that the whole zero carbon sail to New York debacle is actually producing more Co2 than if she had just flown there herself.
quokula wrote: » Your prior suggestions mostly amounted to "the rich" should make sacrifices (I assume you define rich as richer than you, since on a global scale anyone posting on boards.ie is pretty rich) Or practical stuff like better public transport, which is absolutely needed, but you rail against the taxes that could pay for that. It sounds like you want to make no sacrifices, pay no less tax, but have the government and other people magic up solutions for it. The reality is that we all need to make sacrifices and as much as there will always be people who have a bigger carbon footprint than you or I (and Greta is definitely not one of them), there are billions with a lower carbon footprint so that's no excuse.
gozunda wrote: » And dont forget about the biomas being shipped from Australia to Foynes for electricity generation in the Midlands instead of turf. Or the the millions of gallons of fossil fuel it involves getting it there...
Centurion1001 wrote: » What's being done with the existing carbon tax? It's being spent exporting recycled plastic to Vietnam. Sorry but our governments track record with money doesn't make me want to throw more down the pit.
weisses wrote: » I know what you said ...developing brain ...yada yada ...She learned more in this year then any school could teach her ..
weisses wrote: » Teletubbies for you then ?
weisses wrote: » I know what you said ...developing brain ...yada yada ...She learned more in this year then any school could teach her ... I know its a nice stick to beat with ... but ridiculous all the same Yes ... and you did not meant it in a condescending to to her ?? ........ really
Stevieluvsye wrote: » Good idea and get the farmers to build these data centres so everyone is happy
Blueshoe wrote: » We should stop producing beef in Ireland. It may be an important part of our small economy but it would be better if we got it transported from the rain forest chopping Brazilians. We can build data centres in our country side instead. Viva big tech
gozunda wrote: » Both and I strongly disagree. Read the thread for the many reasons it is not a good idea.
gozunda wrote: » Unlike your cheap and frankly nasty potshot - That comment regarding the boat relates to the topic of the thread. It is a fact- it is a multimillion Euro boat skippered by a member of the royal family of Monaco. Go read up on this of you doubt any of this.
gozunda wrote: » Cut the bs weisses. There was no mention in that comment whstsoever about her safety. It's like you can't engage in discussion but have to resort to throwing ****e like that. Ok we know you're a vegan. I am happy for you. Just drop the campaign ok
Centurion1001 wrote: » If you'd read my post above you'd see I've admitted to as much myself. But go ahead and snark and show us all how clever you are.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w6.vanillicon.com/v2/6b0748b4741870baaad828fe92174b3c.svg)
