TomOnBoard wrote: » Autopsy results published... A number of broken neck bones including the hyoid. Cause of death not yet finalised.
Which leads us to the basic questions of the case: who protected Epstein for decades, and why? There are several explanations floating around for the why: those in power enjoyed their diabolically exploitive visits to Lolita Island and wanted to continue their criminal gratifications. The second explanation is that Epstein was a spy for a "friendly" foreign intelligence agency and therefore off-limits. ("Friendly" is in quotes because when it comes to intelligence, one's "friends" can do more damage than one's worst enemies.) <snip>So exploiting vulnerable girls served the "national interests" and therefore it's all OK. If we're supposed to believe this is the heart of the matter, how is America any different from a corrupt developing-world kleptocracy organized to gratify a handful of oligarchs and their cronies?source
source
JP Liz V1 wrote: » Yes how is she not in custody
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » She should be brought in immediately. Still don't understand why she not arrested yet. She was Epstein accomplice.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » A giant sized painting of Bill Clinton wearing a blue dress and heels in his house, is just weird. Imagine Bill was actually there when it was done;)
BILL’S DOUBLE TROUBLE Bill Clinton seen walking off with a woman on each arm during a stay at Jeffrey Epstein’s private Caribbean Island, court docs claim
Saige Putrid Rainfall wrote: » Alive..... For how long
IIGeminiII wrote: » Not even surprised.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » She still alive. Ghislaine Maxwell, long-time consort of Jeffrey Epstein and the alleged procurer of victims in his underage sex trafficking ring, has been laying low in a New England beach town, DailyMail.com has learned exclusively. Maxwell, 57, is in a relationship with Scott Borgerson, 43, and has been living with him at his secluded oceanfront property at the end of a long private road in Manchester-by-the-Sea, Massachusetts.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7352813/Ghislaine-Maxwell-consort-Jeffrey-Epstein-living-mansion-outside-Boston.html
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Jeffrey Epstein had a painting which appeared to be Bill Clinton wearing a blue dress and red heels hanging inside his Manhattan home[/url]
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Daily Mail getting sued if false. Picture provided in link Jeffrey Epstein had a painting which appeared to be Bill Clinton wearing a blue dress and red heels hanging inside his Manhattan homehttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7353967/Did-Jeffrey-Epstein-portrait-Bill-Clinton-blue-dress-red-heels-NYC-mansion.html
martingriff wrote: » I suppose its different laws plus when you have the money for the best lawyers they can keep opposing and going to court to frustrate. The time frame of how long it took I think is the least conspiratorial part. Maybe someone with a more legal brain can supply a better answer
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Why, all they have to do get a warrant to search the property?
martingriff wrote: » Was been opposed by Epstein from what In have read now he has died there is no one to stop them
martingriff wrote: » Jesus!!!!!
archer22 wrote: » Well you can't blame people for being suspicious when the most anticipated and most predicted death in world history happens!.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » If anything this raid seems like PR exercise. Took them this long to go there? The FBI and NYPD should have gone to this house months ago.
Pa ElGrande wrote: » If you look at plan crashes it's often not a single thing that goes wrong but a combination of circumstances (e.g. Air France Flight 447) A rather telling quote from an ex-prisoner is "I told my parents not to come there. God wasn’t in the building." The prison is over populated and understaffed and there does appears to be be a could not give a sh!t attitude toward fixing it from the top (i.e. politicians) down. We don't know yet is the actual mechanics of how he hung himself because supposedly the bedsheets are not suitable?? I reckon we will eventually get an answer to that. Then there will be the question did he pay someone to let it happen? or did someone approve after presenting him with the alternatives?
Franz Von Peppercorn II wrote: » Do you mean incompetence? I don’t think incompetence reasonably explains all of what went wrong here. The sum total of all probabilities of all the incompetencies are vanishingly small. What’s the chance that the shrink was incompetent enough to take him off suicide watch? That the cameras are out. That the warden is incompetent. That one prison guard fails to do his rounds. That another one also fails to do it. (This is bread and butter stuff). That nobody notices them both asleep. (Did they cuddle?). That equipment to hang someone is left in the cell against procedure. That he could hang himself from the bunk at all being 6ft something. That nobody else heard anything nor called the prison guards. Corruption is easy to explain.
NoteAgent wrote: » I'm not sure I understand what you mean. The local newspaper found out who the winner was and it wasn't Epstein. What more is there to say. Oh wait let me guess, he controls that newspaper as well?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/dcbc16ebc222633fce50824c4b8e3c07.svg)