Van.Bosch wrote: » Is there a revised delivery for LRA?
adam88 wrote: » Just a quick question. Am I right in saying the neo will be flying to the east coast??? If so why bother with the LR or even the xlr??? Sorry if this had been asked before. Also. The 321neo, will that be fitted with business class ?
Van.Bosch wrote: » Just landed now. How many test flights are usually needed?
billy few mates wrote: » Only one if it passes. This isn't exactly a new aircraft type, it's a derivative so there shouldn't really be that much needed, once everything is ok the operator will usually do a Customer Acceptance Flight Test but unless it's the first aircraft of its type off the line the manufacturer's tests are fairly minimal.
so i got an email today saying my flight to new york in february will now take 8hours 50 mins instead of 7h45m. have never been on a flight that long to jfk with EI. anyone able to fill me in what the extra hour flighttime is for???
Tenger wrote: » EI-115 returned to DUB earlier today, declared "Pan, Pan" after suspected birdstrike on takeoff. Atrocious online article (nova.ie) claimed emergency landing occured. (Understandable assumption) and that "ATC confirmed flames on the righthand side of the large aircraft" (nonsense)
goingnowhere wrote: » Hmm EI2395 395 is Hamburg Dublin 2 implies a scheduled extra flight, passengers onboard? Not a 99x
Tenger wrote: » There probably is a HAM-DUB flite that day, so in essence it is an extra flight. 99x are the usual number for positioning flights. But EI have previously used 2xxx for delivery and maintainace flights. Delivery flights (from memory) will be 2 flight crew and a couple of engineering staff. (A mate was on the retrojet delivery flight. He was giving me updates from TLS all day) That schedule could be pushed later in the day as the lawyers and financiers need to have a long conference call before EI take ownership of the aircraft. Another quality report by the Mirror. Nice segway into Sullenberger!!
Tenger wrote: » and that "ATC confirmed flames on the righthand side of the large aircraft" (nonsense)
Sexual Chocolate wrote: » Did it head out to the Irish Sea because it had to dump fuel ?