Necro wrote: » I thought the decision to keep the same lynch post each night was a great idea.
Green&Red wrote: » As I said in my initial post I’m far from blameless for what I post but I do see a difference between personal abuse and other offensive language. My main issue wasn’t with the post where you called me stupid, I absolutely didn’t like it but today when I referenced it and told you I didn’t want to engage with you I was called pathetic. So if I’m to understand, there was no apology but under no circumstances am I allowed take offence, bring it up or refuse to engage further with you? And if I do I’m pathetic? Pathetic and stupid are probably me two least favourite words. **** is probably my favourite If someone has an issue with something I say I expect them to bring it up with me, Oisin did and I addressed it. The racism comment was clearly said in jest but sometimes tone can be hard to get right obviously. Look, you don’t like how I reacted to you. I see it as just that, a reaction. From my point of view something not of my making ruined my enjoyment of the game. Like I said it’ll make me think twice about playing again. If you are genuine about not wanting to turn people away from the game then I’d suggest not calling people pathetic or stupid would be a good place to start. I think it’s obvious we’re not going to come to a conclusion on this so for my part I’m going to park it. If I do play another game I certainly won’t be using this in any manner
tusk wrote: » Gertrude converting was the single worst thing that could have happened to the village.
Rikand wrote: » Gertrude was Drumpot ? Well now the voting the same person 3 days in a row makes sense.
Deleted User wrote: » Would you have axed me if I had argued back at you or were you all in on that. I kinda wish I had put some points against it but I also hadn't posted after 9 any night so I was trying to stay consistnet I did give out about you in the backroom but also gave you a very begrudging compliment and given you had just sentenced me to death a begrudging one is an A+
tusk wrote: » Dandy you confused the f*ck out of me in that game!
sKeith wrote: and understand that lots of wild and mad stuff can be said during a game. I know this has been apoligised for and forgiven etc., and i never needed any apoligies in the first place, because heat of the moment anger etc falls of my back, but i just want YOU to remember it.
Necro wrote: » And afterwards. Sure me and Mick tore the heads off each other post game back in the day and now look at us we're grand now. Same with me and beaker at one point. It happens, just take a few days and cool off is the best advice I can give... This advice doesn't apply to me though, ever :P
Deleted User wrote: Ya apologies about that, it took me sometime to come around to some clear headed thinking and I'm not sure I ever actually apologised
Necro wrote: » No worries, all water under the bridge bud!
Bounty Hunter wrote: » I liked the slower paced games recently and throwing in a few roles etc in Bond worked well imo. Making a game atm has made me think I might be interested in running a longer one in a few months between games. Mon-Fri games with storylines could probably get too complex very easily but stretch a complex game over 2 weeks and that could be a lot of fun.
Necro wrote: » Thanks BH, I agree there's definitely a place for them. My own thoughts on 007 is that maybe it was a step too far in having games so close to each other coming off Deadwood into Silence into Hunger Games into Bond. The energy in the thread didn't seem as evident as most games, particularly in the last day or so. Maybe down to burnout? I can't really answer that. But I don't think it should put off others from running a game they want. If you build it, they will come