nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Alex Jones content removed from Facebook, Youtube, Apple

Kermit.de.frog

http://www.fox10tv.com/story/38822431/youtube-apple-and-facebook-remove-content-from-infowars-and-alex-jones

The lunatic has been removed from the asylum.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DH4WF-JUdR4

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Dohnjoe

20Cent wrote: »

He literally started a gang that went around beating people up.

Just reading about it now, he founded some white supremacist neo-fascist men-only group that goes around attacking people. The 1930's called they want their jackboot **** back.

Billy86

VicMackey1 wrote: »

That sh*te is taken out of context completely

Let me guess... In all those videos where he repeatedly calls for violence - violence which on many occasions he then took part in - he was "only joking"?

Wash. Rinse. Repeat.

ancapailldorcha

VicMackey1 wrote: »

That sh*te is taken out of context completely. People should be very wary of how videos are edited. The Covington High School video being a perfect example Maybe you should look up the person that posted that video, Vic Berger

That's a weak defence. You say taken out of context and then go for a deflection.

I don't know who this guy is but he's clearly some sort of vile fascist. He's openly advocating the use of violence against anyone with a different opinion and there's people on here who think he's some kind of hero.

VicMackey1

Billy86 wrote: »

Not a clue, Vic.

https://mobile.twitter.com/vicbergeriv/status/1052373743165681664?lang=en

Not... A... Clue...

That sh*te is taken out of context completely. People should be very wary of how videos are edited. The Covington High School video being a perfect example Maybe you should look up the person that posted that video, Vic Berger

batgoat

VicMackey1 wrote: »

Lets say he is attention seeking so. Doesnt that make every youtuber and twitter mainaic an attention seeker? Is that reason to silence them?

But that's not just what he's famous for. Eg I'm aware of McInnes because the Proud Boys marched in Charlottesville. A rally of far right racists and anti-semites with Tiki Torches which included the murder of a woman... So he's not merely an attention seeker. He's an extremist by any measure with an established association to a pretty horrific event.

Billy86

VicMackey1 wrote: »

Gavin McInnes could be next to get the chop on youtube. Ive watched a lot of his videos over the years and I cant understand why he would be a target! I think the term hate speech is being thrown around far to often.

Not a clue, Vic.

https://mobile.twitter.com/vicbergeriv/status/1052373743165681664?lang=en

Not... A... Clue...

Cienciano

VicMackey1 wrote: »

Attention seeking! Have you any examples?

Do you need the video of him sticking the butt plug up his arse?

VicMackey1

batgoat wrote: »

Tbh, the video you just linked looks like a great example based on the image alone..

Lets say he is attention seeking so. Doesnt that make every youtuber and twitter mainaic an attention seeker? Is that reason to silence them?

VicMackey1

MrFresh wrote: »

So why were a number of their members prosecuted for street fights?

Its not as if they are going around randomly beating up people! These fights afaik were against antifa members who are no saints. They usually show up at events to incite violence.

Atoms for Peace

20Cent wrote: »

He literally started a gang that went around beating people up.

But a trendy hipster gang with beards and flannel shirts.

batgoat

VicMackey1 wrote: »

Attention seeking! Have you any examples?

Tbh, the video you just linked looks like a great example based on the image alone..

MrFresh

VicMackey1 wrote: »

Thats not true. They were a group that provided security at events for conservative speakers. Antifa had a habit of showing up to try silencing them.

So why were a number of their members prosecuted for street fights?

MrFresh

VicMackey1 wrote: »

Gavin McInnes could be next to get the chop on youtube. Ive watched a lot of his videos over the years and I cant understand why he would be a target! I think the term hate speech is being thrown around far to often.

Maybe because hate speech is being normalised and being used more often.

VicMackey1

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

I stand corrected. He is an attention seeking whinger.

Attention seeking! Have you any examples?

ohnonotgmail

VicMackey1 wrote: »

A snowflake is someone who is easily offended! Thats certainly not Gavin McInnes!

I stand corrected. He is an attention seeking whinger.

VicMackey1

20Cent wrote: »

He literally started a gang that went around beating people up.

Thats not true. They were a group that provided security at events for conservative speakers. Antifa had a habit of showing up to try silencing them.

VicMackey1

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

What an attention seeking snowflake he is.

A snowflake is someone who is easily offended! Thats certainly not Gavin McInnes!

20Cent

VicMackey1 wrote: »

Gavin McInnes could be next to get the chop on youtube. Ive watched a lot of his videos over the years and I cant understand why he would be a target! I think the term hate speech is being thrown around far to often.

He literally started a gang that went around beating people up.

ohnonotgmail

VicMackey1 wrote: »

Gavin McInnes could be next to get the chop on youtube. Ive watched a lot of his videos over the years and I cant understand why he would be a target! I think the term hate speech is being thrown around far to often.

What an attention seeking snowflake he is.

VicMackey1

Gavin McInnes could be next to get the chop on youtube. Ive watched a lot of his videos over the years and I cant understand why he would be a target! I think the term hate speech is being thrown around far to often.

WinnyThePoo

Sweetemotion wrote: »

I bet the same posters here, claiming splashuum post as a conspiracy theory to try and discredit him as a nut. Swallowed up the big conspiracy of the Trump Russian collusion.

Swing and a miss:).

Sweetemotion

I bet the same posters here, claiming splashuum post as a conspiracy theory to try and discredit him as a nut. Swallowed up the big conspiracy of the Trump Russian collusion.

Dohnjoe

splashuum wrote: »

Whether your left,right or in between If you can’t see how this is clear election meddling you may need your head checked. They are banning everything and anything pro-trump.

The fb employee responsible for handling last weeks bans was the former press director of “Hilary for America”.

But many will of course ignore these facts.

Ah, so it's a conspiracy?

MrFresh

splashuum wrote: »

Whether your left,right or in between If you can’t see how this is clear election meddling you may need your head checked. They are banning everything and anything pro-trump.

The fb employee responsible for handling last weeks bans was the former press director of “Hilary for America”.

But many will of course ignore these facts.

This fact, singular. You only stated one. The rest is opinion. They obviously aren't banning everything pro-Trump because he is still on Twitter and it's not like there isn't cause to remove him.

batgoat

splashuum wrote: »

Whether your left,right or in between If you can’t see how this is clear election meddling you may need your head checked. They are banning everything and anything pro-trump.

The fb employee responsible for handling last weeks bans was the former press director of “Hilary for America”.

But many will of course ignore these facts.

See, now you're veering into batty conspiracy turf....

MrFresh

splashuum wrote: »

Facebook stated PJW was banned for inciting hate, nothing to do with conspiracy theories. Facebook are now facing a massive lawsuit as they cannot back up their claims.

However it seems if you owned Facebook you would ban him for “conspiracy theories”. You would assume for a platform to ban a user for this that they would have to be churning out new and dangerous theories daily. Can you justify why he should to be banned for this?

Because they are dangerous. Pizzagate resulted in a man arming himself and going to a pizza restaurant. Anti-vax has resulted in outbreaks of preventable diseases. Sandy Hook conspiracies have resulted in harassment and threats towards the parents of murdered children.

But to be fair, they don't rally need to justify it. If Mr Watson is happy to defend a baker for refusing service to someone based on their orientation, what's the issue with a social media platform refusing service to someone base don their political views?

Ipso

splashuum wrote: »

Whether your left,right or in between If you can’t see how this is clear election meddling you may need your head checked. They are banning everything and anything pro-trump.

The fb employee responsible for handling last weeks bans was the former press director of “Hilary for America”.

But many will of course ignore these facts.

Louis Farakan is pro Trump?

splashuum

Whether your left,right or in between If you can’t see how this is clear election meddling you may need your head checked. They are banning everything and anything pro-trump.

The fb employee responsible for handling last weeks bans was the former press director of “Hilary for America”.

But many will of course ignore these facts.

batgoat

splashuum wrote: »

Facebook stated PJW was banned for inciting hate, nothing to do with conspiracy theories. Facebook are now facing a massive lawsuit as they cannot back up their claims.

However it seems if you owned Facebook you would ban him for “conspiracy theories”. You would assume for a platform to ban a user for this that they would have to be churning out new and dangerous theories daily. Can you justify why he should to be banned for this?

Care to back up this massive lawsuit? Cause I would say it's extraordinarily unlikely.

splashuum

MrFresh wrote: »

splashuum wrote: »

Please give me examples of where PJW has engaged in inciting hate or violence?

No. I never said he did. PJW falls in the conspiracy category.

Facebook stated PJW was banned for inciting hate, nothing to do with conspiracy theories. Facebook are now facing a massive lawsuit as they cannot back up their claims.

However it seems if you owned Facebook you would ban him for “conspiracy theories”. You would assume for a platform to ban a user for this that they would have to be churning out new and dangerous theories daily. Can you justify why he should to be banned for this?