mcmoustache wrote: » When did they say that? They reported that he was being investigated for it, which he was, but I don't recall RTÉ taking the position that Trump colluded with Russia.
Patty Hearst wrote: » Yes they did, they inferred it every single day.
mcmoustache wrote: » That's because it's genuinely difficult to polish turds. Even Brexit and Trump friendly media find it very hard to spin those shítshows as something positive.
is_that_so wrote: » How can anyone be biased about the Brexit mess?
Cienciano wrote: » Paul Joseph Watson has said on twitter in the last few hours that he wants the Trump administration to step in and take action on his ban. I'm not sure if this is a big joke, or as PJW would say, "honk honk"
mcmoustache wrote: » Any evidence of this or are you just making up your own facts? I only ask because it sure looks like you're just making stuff up now. Not unlike Alex Jones, strangely enough.
stefanovich wrote: » Theresa May is doing a bad job, as a remainer PM why wouldn't she. They never consider the idea that Brexit could be positive for the UK. They never consider the possibility that the EU as an institution might be doing some harm. They never cover the positive things Trump has done for the USA.
Patty Hearst wrote: » Perhaps one of the European Right wing Govts will ban any mention of Transgenderism on social media. I'm sure all those who support PJW, Jones etc bans will have no problem with that.
Patty Hearst wrote: » Google is your friend as they say. I'm not going back over two years of reports for you. The truth is though that you are not interested in discussion but rather to deny, obsfucate etc Making stuff up? have you been in a cave for the last two years?
is_that_so wrote: » Oh, she's doing a shockingly bad job and we all wish that Brexit would actually happen. As for Trump, well mostly he doesn't do positive things for anyone except himself.
mcmoustache wrote: » How is that remotely similar to kicking someone off a private platform for harassing the parents of victims of a school shooting?
stefanovich wrote: » Look at the jobless figures, look at the economy.
Ipso wrote: » Funny when numbers were good in the Obama era, they were fake. Thing is, if he takes credit for the good he must take responsibility for any bad. Does he strike you as that type of person?
stefanovich wrote: » So your main problem is his personality, not his results? Curious attitude.
Ipso wrote: » His character; pathological liar, ignorant, think skinned, vindictive, egotistical, panders to the tin foul brigade etc
Cienciano wrote: » The slippery slope fallacy. Otherwise known as "bullshít".
is_that_so wrote: » Most of us are harmless, despite how edgy we think ourselves, so little danger of that unless you're into tinfoil hats!
Seanachai wrote: » With all due respect you don't know how quickly the political situation of a country\society can change. The freedom of expression that you take for granted may not always be there, even in the near future. That's not tinfoil hat stuff, it's everyday reality for a lot of people.
Patty Hearst wrote: » Thats just Jones, I don't recall Milo, PJW, Laura Loomer etc harassing any parents of school shooting victims
Patty Hearst wrote: » Sometimes I despair at how utterly weak and pathetic many of the Millennial generation are. But seeing how different a lot of the younger generation seem to be, it gives me hope. The 14 year old girl in the video above sums it up quite well.
