Augme wrote: » How exactly are they freeloaders?
eagle eye wrote: » Which politician have you voted for who has provided in-depth knowledge on things?
gandalf wrote: » Well I ensure I am familiar with the policies that they are espousing you have admitted you don't know what he stands for beyond populace ****e that appears in the papers. What truth does he tell? The guy doesn't even appear to be paying taxes in this country. All I see is a rich guy who will do fVck all to alleviate the problems of this state and the gimps who will enable him to get into a position where he can only cause more damage. As for direct provision yes something needs to be done about the length that people are held in it in this state. There should be enough resources in place to hasten decisions and either deport those who don't have a case or let those who do start their new lives in this country and contribute to it. I see nothing from this guy bar soundbites and absolutely nothing of substance on real solutions to real problems.
super_furry wrote: » Casey can do exactly nothing about direct provision or national policy as an MEP. What he's doing here is appealing to the same people who suddenly supported him during the presendential election when he attacked travellers but going after another minority group. It's pure cynicism and appealing to the lowest common denominator who just want someone else to blame for their own problems. Casey could do nothing about travellers as President and nothing about direct provision as an MEP, but there's a cohort of easily manipulated people out there who will vote for him solely on the basis that he's going after them.
Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: » Are you calling me a gimp? The only gimps around here are the brainwashed fools voting for FFFGLB expecting a different outcome. Casey will shake things up. Lads like Jean Paul Juncker and Donald tusk will be very uncomfortable when actual representatives of the people arrive to Brussels to shake things up.
BarryD2 wrote: » There is still a basic truth at the heart of his campaign issues. Ordinary people hear and understand that, whilst accepting he exaggerates.
Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: » Hell do more than the current crop of useless ****ers in Brussels. Hopefully he uses his platform to solve rural burglaries and ends direct provision. There are 4 people of voting age in my house. All voting casey no. 1
trashcan wrote: » So you want to end direct provision ? You'd be in favour of giving asylum seekers houses of their own then ? (You do realise that's the alternative, right ? - and don't bother saying, no, the alternative is to put them all on planes. That is not legally possible. You cannot deport asylum seekers ) If you think Peter Casey is going to change the Common European Asylum system, not to mention our own domestic immigration laws, then I'm afraid you're in for a disappointment.
Faugheen wrote: » You keep saying Casey will shake things up. I've asked you twice now what are his policies to 'shake things up' and you've refused to give an answer. I'll ask you again. What are the policies you like about Casey that matches his mouth? He has none, therefore will do f*ck all, and gullible fools will keep voting for him because underneath it all, they're probably a little bit racist.
super_furry wrote: He's complaining about things that would he would never be able to address just because he knows that there's a cohort of people who want to see someone go after refugees and travellers. These aren't campaign issues. He can't effect any change to these situations in either of the roles he stood for. He's going after the easiest of targets to appeal to the lowest common denominator.
RollieFingers wrote: » Casey is the leader we need, he tells it like it is unlike the usual waffle trotted out by Leo and Slimon and the likes.
Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: » I suppose you're a man who votes for the establishment. You can tell it from your tone. Terrified of the likes of casey who is not afraid to call it like it is! It's actually great to see. I don't know what his policies are. He's not elected yet. We'll see what they are once he gets his seat. I'm just glad to see someone who is not afraid to speak his mind.
Faugheen wrote: At least the parties I vote for have policies and that I know what I'm getting.
Charles Ingles wrote: He is excellent on the week off n politics. How the hell did Maria Walsh get on the ticket
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Gay woman, ex winner of the lovely girl competition. Ticks a few boxes for some.
eagle eye wrote: » Can you point out those people you voted for who have promised things before an election and then delivered on them.
Faugheen wrote: Policies are different to promises.
Charles Ingles wrote: Is that the real reason has she any political pedigree or she she just a "celebrity" candidate
Plumbthedepths wrote: » Charles Ingles wrote: He is excellent on the week off n politics. How the hell did Maria Walsh get on the ticket Gay woman, ex winner of the lovely girl competition. Ticks a few boxes for some.
eagle eye wrote: » Not if they never actually act on them. It just means you are a fool believing anything that comes out of their mouths before an election. Surely when it happens twice you'd have enough sense to stop falling for it.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » No political predigree at all. Celebrity seems to be her qualification.
Charles Ingles wrote: » He is excellent on the week in politics. How the hell did Maria Walsh get on the ticket
