stockshares wrote: » The Inventor of it is a phantom.
stockshares wrote: » How many more projects have people at the helm who are criminals in all but name and are best avoided?
stockshares wrote: » How many of the original Bitcoin team are left. How sound can they be considering that at one time they thought the Bch and Bsv guys were sound.
Kickstart1.3 wrote: » You can add Rodger Ver to that list also. CEO of Bitcoin.com, serious nut job, spent time in prison for Fraud. Now spends all his time shilling Bitcoin Cash, which he claimed was the original Bitcoin only to go ahead and have the code changed to suit private companies that run code like Wormhole
lawred2 wrote: » Who was the lad that staged a fake ICO? Just took the whole website with the white paper offline on ICO day then tweeted a picture of himself at a departure lounge and followed up later with a tweet from some beach...
grindle wrote: » That was a PR stunt to show how easily it could happen & get their name in the papers. Probably the wrong choice given most think he's on a beach somewhere. Edit: Savedroid Prodeum's (revolutionising the fruit and veg industry, oh my word) exit scam was succinct:
lawred2 wrote: » Was that definitely it? Name doesn't ring a bell. Could very well be now.. not saying it's not
grindle wrote: »
Tinder Surprise wrote: » I stay in the mindset that everyone is out to make a quick buck and potentially screw you over in the process. Its easier and safer. This new wave of development and roll out 'trust-less transaction' systems and networks is ironically full of folk not to trust. Bad actors will be weeded out eventually, but until then it will resemble something like the Wild Wild West. Thread carefully.
grindle wrote: » That's quite funny, he's some chancer. And the spin the spokesperson's putting on it then... Ah god.Dear AnyFúckingBody Justin, If you give us some money to buy the fouling mercenaries players we need to maintain our lead against Man City Liverpool's glorious heritage, we will help to shill your shítcoin utopian ideals, Yours Liverpudlianly, Jürgen Norbert Klopp
grindle wrote: » Greg Maxwell [BTC Core developer & Blockstream co-founder]. How people can ignore the astroturfing and gaslighting is beyond me, but hey - as long a somebody makes some shekels, amirite?
stockshares wrote: » Im new to this but its striking how many Dodgy characters came out of the one project.
grindle wrote: » It's predictable considering the benefit they'd gain if they succeed plus it was the essentially the only project of it's kind for years. Any industry with lucrative gains up for grabs is full to the brim with ravenous scum, but it doesn't mean they all are. Look at the country you live in, every second mongoloid is a landlord looking to fleece their fellow countrymen. That's not specific to our country or to landlords or anything - some dirtbag makes some money fleecing people, somebody else gets jealous and tries to repeat what the initial pleb did. "Any industry with lucrative gains..." Onwards and upwards (until it crashes).
stockshares wrote: » Considering the people involved are so dodgy who checks the code and cryptography of these projects. How do people know that these transactions and blockchain ledgers are actually trustless.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » Justin Sun appears to announce a partnership with Liverpool FC. Loads of bag holders almost have a heart attack with excitement.https://twitter.com/justinsuntron/status/1120927231587393536?s=21 Few hours later:https://decryptmedia.com/6684/tron-liverpool-football-club-fc
grindle wrote: » Tenuous connection to crypto given he's a tasteless shítstirring troll on a small Irish sub-forum, but he's ranted about crypto and fraud enough: JohnnyFlash - self-admitted electoral fraudster! Funny that, eh? Constantly whinging about a technology that would render this impossible and taking advantage of the fact that it currently isn't, what a guy.
nuac wrote: Are you suggesting duplication of polling cards allows you to vote twice? Not so. that would be a criminal offence.
110 Prohibition on voting by person registered as elector when not entitled to be so registered. 110. (1) A person— (a) who is registered in the register of local government electors for the time being in force for a local electoral area but is not entitled to be so registered, or (b) who is not registered in that register, shall not vote in that local electoral area. (2) A person who contravenes sub-article (1) shall be guilty of an offence.
113 Misleading statement as to process of voting. 113. Any person who, before or during an election, makes or publishes any statement which is likely to mislead voters as to the actual process of voting shall be guilty of an offence.
unkel wrote: » Unbelievable stuff. How the hell is it even possible to be registered for voting twice? This register is obviously not linked to social security (PPS) records. Only in Ireland :rolleyes:
grindle wrote: » Wowowow, a new entry, so quickly too! Pintman Paddy Losty. I never would've expected this kind of carry-on at all. I don't give a toss where you live or if you think it justifies a right to more than one vote. The mod - and more importantly the government - seem to think it's illegal: Beyond admitting that you also commit the offence, your attempt to justify it is an offence in itself: Cop on ffs. Any critique of fraud by you guys any point from now on has been completely devalued by yourselves.
Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: » It'll be a sad day when the block chain replaces the electoral register. Thankfully it won't be coming any time soon.
