batgoat wrote: » As specified by another user who knows the owner, it got cancelled because the owner did not realise the extent of how reprehensible Gemma's views are.... So get over yourself.
After reading some postings of the person in question...I personally, certainly don’t agree with some of her views, but I have little problems with free speech.
BBFAN wrote: » As a matter of interest Patty Hearst, which party do you see winning the next election and leading us into the greater land??? Cause as far as I can see you hate any party that has any chance of even getting close to government yet see a huge sea change in our future?? What???? :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
Jackman25 wrote: » From their twitter. Looks like they were aware of Gemmas views.
Jackman25 wrote: » Its positively tiny I would think - phone box job. So why don't people leave them to have their little meetings then without all the nonsense giving them unnecessary publicity. As I said before, social media activists will never miss a chance to show their "activism".
batgoat wrote: » Patty went weirdly silent the other day when I sourced some of the stuff she/he was posting back to some weird Neo Nazi sites.... So interesting views to say the least. You could have an idea but know the extent fully... Eg An Spailpín Fánach which was the other place she was holding an event. They're pretty left wing so it was inevitable that they dropped her when they became aware as well.
Patty Hearst wrote: » Keep an eye on the European elections. As it happens I do not see much change yet in 'Paddy Last' perpetually behind the times Ireland. What happens in Europe will set the stage for what happens here. Irexit are building, National party are building, Renua are building. I don't think you understand the hatred out there for the foot soldiers of Capitalism PBP and assorted lefties. Sinn Fein are losing grass roots supporters by the day and are dropping in the polls. If there is any kind of economic slowdown in the coming years hold on to your hats.
Patty Hearst wrote: » What was this?
batgoat wrote: » I actually do think it's okay to specify in a review that you have an issue with the people that they allow to host in their venue. You haven't illustrated anything that isn't respecting freedom of speech as it's literally using it.
Don't even know what the second paragraph relates to. So just an insane rant or what?
blackwhite wrote: » Funnily enough, I’d say most posting about GOD’s vile racism on here have f*ck all time for SF, PBP or the loony left. We just know that Gemma is the other cheek of the same arse, a rabble-rousing lowest-common-denominator-seeking sh1te-spouter. The only difference is that she includes spouting hate on her list of populist nonsense. Appeals to the terminally unemployable who are incapable of accepting their own deficiencies, and instead need conspiracy theories to try and convince themselves that they aren’t just a waste of space
BBFAN wrote: » Renua are building??????? Source please. Last I heard they were absolutely falling off the cliff, :rolleyes:
batgoat wrote: » . In reality the number of people who Gemma actually appeals to in Ireland is relatively small.
batgoat wrote: » You're anti-fa archived piece... I sourced the actual background to the piece which you ignored at the time. The other part was that the two main sites linking to it were of questionable origin.
Maurice Yeltsin wrote: » Reviews are meant to be for customers to report their experience as paid users of a venue (or unpaid, if the place or the staff are so bad you leave without engaging). They are not meant for a bunch of nonces to throw a hissy fit because the hotel allowed a meeting take place hosted by someone to whom you're idealogically opposed. Left wingers are generally unemployed and usually display wealth envy. They have little respect for the sacrifice it takes to get a business off the ground as most of them have no desire to earn an income beyond either welfare or working for a state funded quango (Galway Anti Racism or some other scutter). Of course, a great deal of Gemma's followers are the exact same. The problem for your mob is that they now respect Gemma more than Ruth, Paul, Brid et al. And you're running scared. As an aside though, despite the aforementioned clowns getting elected I'd be very surprised if the ACI movement even runs a single Dail candidate let alone gets any elected. And I'd imagine the movement is too new to organise for the council elections. Running for office would mean Gemma engaging in debate, and judging from her youtube she isn't articulate enough to do that.
Patty Hearst wrote: » The interview was real, the subsequent denial was a lie. Strange that an American hoaxer would have so many details about Ireland and Irish AntiFa isn't it? The fact that it showed up on an American site is irrelevant. It actually showed up on Irish sites soon after it was published.
Patty Hearst wrote: » Irexit are building, National party are building, Renua are building. I don't think you understand the hatred out there for the foot soldiers of Capitalism PBP and assorted lefties. Sinn Fein are losing grass roots supporters by the day and are dropping in the polls.
gmisk wrote: » The last poll I can find from end of Feb has them on less than 1%
BBFAN wrote: » You do know what nonce means yes?? Fairly disgusting use of the word.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » I'm no fan of PBP but they have multiple times the support of any of the far-right crazies. They actually have TDs, and Councillors. .
Patty Hearst wrote: » The founder of Anti Fa Ireland was certainly a Nonce..a convicted Nonce.
BBFAN wrote: » The reason is simple. As long as looneys think they have a platform they will carry on with their looney crap. The sooner they realise no-one wants to hear their crap the sooner they'll seek help with their mental problems.
blackwhite wrote: » You clearly don’t understand the word “some” Stuff like the NZ claims from a Gemma were pointed out, as well as many of the tweets and videos from the filth who support her. Michael decided his business is better served by not having evil scum like some of those likely to turn up in support of Gemma darken it’s door
Patty Hearst wrote: » In any case you are losing and the tide is turning, its happening all over Europe it will happen here too. The amount of ordinary non political people who lately have expressed to me an absolute loathing of the PBP, Sinn Fein, SJW class was quite something to behold. The fact that they have to attempt to shut down Gemma at every turn shows how desperate they are.
batgoat wrote: » Here we go again, prove it. Your source for this specific claim is the Kilkenny Journal aka crazy man's blog. It seems like facts aren't a biggy for you.https://www.facebook.com/KilkennyJournal/posts/antifa-leader-found-guilty-of-being-a-paedophile-this-is-the-fella-calling-other/1015740601826613/
Birneybau wrote: » Wasn't Patty Hearst's defense at her trial as being part of the Symbionese Liberation Army, that she had been brainwashed?
Patty Hearst wrote: » Yes just like the ISIS bride who is returning to Ireland...the one the Irish media tells us was 'brainwashed'
At the time of her arrest, Patty Hearst weighed only 87 pounds (40 kg) and was described by Dr. Margaret Singer in October 1975 as "a low-IQ, low-affect zombie".[41] Shortly after her arrest, there were some clear signs of trauma: her IQ was measured as 112, whereas it had previously been 130; there were huge gaps in her memory regarding her pre-Tania life; she was smoking heavily and had nightmares.[42] Without a mental illness or defect, a person was held fully responsible for any criminal action not done under duress, defined as a clear and present threat of death or serious injury.[43][44] Securing an acquittal on the basis of brainwashing would be completely unprecedented.[45][46]
