nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

lbc2019

Some of her posts on twitter lately seem to be off the charts.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

blackwhite

As of 7 min ago Gemma is claiming the meeting is going ahead.

Looks like Gemma is opposed to property owners having the right to decide how to use their own premises

Annasopra

This free speech sh ite is thick and stupid.

Gemma DOES NOT STAND FOR FREE SPEECH.

She hired security to remove people from an ACI meeting in Meath. She targets and harasses her critics online actively encouraging others to do so too. She has been sending out hundreds of solicitors letters to get people to remove social media posts.

Gemma is actively trying to silence, harass and bully her critics.

skepticalme

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

So basically behind it all you support Gemma. You support her views and you support her harassment and bullying of people that disagree with her. You dont really give a sh it about free speech at all because you want Gemmas critics silenced, harassed and bullied.

There you go again throwing around statements without any evidence.
Having just been an observer of what is going on, it's disgraceful.
Gemma's critics are in no danger of being silenced, they are thugs who threaten businesses and threaten to show up at meetings to cause trouble.
This will end in violence and it won't be G O Dohertys fault.

gman2k

Any day a meeting of fascists is cancelled due to pressure from normal decent people is a good day.
This argument about free speech is bollocks.
Fcuk Fascists.

Billcarson

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

This free speech sh ite is thick and stupid.

Gemma DOES NOT STAND FOR FREE SPEECH.

She hired security to remove people from an ACI meeting in Meath. She targets and harasses her critics online actively encouraging others to do so too. She has been sending out hundreds of solicitors letters to get people to remove social media posts.

Gemma is actively trying to silence, harass and bully her critics.

Where's your evidence for this???

[Deleted User]

Are people actively seeking out conspiracy theories to follow? I know some people that I would consider very intelligent, dipping into some strange climate change, brexit etc theories. I genuinely think they don't believe it per se but want these things to be true because as far as they're concerned it's more interesting.

Gemma O'Doherty is a dangerous individual, fuelling what I can only describe as an anti-intelligence movement. I have absolutely no problem with people opposing her, and if that means businesses refusing service then so be it.

gman2k

Billcarson wrote:

Where's your evidence for this???

Anyone who has the temerity to ask a question of her on Twitter gets instantly blocked, then denounced as a government / Soros troll

Hotblack Desiato

Billcarson wrote: »

Glorifying what? Killing Muslims? Lol. If you think that's what gemma is about well then i suggest you learn more about her. But you have made up your mind anyways that she is a rasist.

Reading comprehension fail.

batgoat

Billcarson wrote: »

Where's your evidence for this???

Was a pretty notable case of somebody being removed a month back.

Billcarson

Hotblack Desiato wrote: »

Billcarson wrote: »

Glorifying what? Killing Muslims? Lol. If you think that's what gemma is about well then i suggest you learn more about her. But you have made up your mind anyways that she is a rasist.

Reading comprehension fail.

Sorry . Maybe the fact I agree with alot of what gemma says has dulled my mind and made me stupid.

[Deleted User]

Billcarson wrote: »

Sorry . Maybe the fact I agree with alot of what gemma says has dulled my mind and made me stupid.

What do you agree with? Honestly curious if there's something more than the 5G flat earther type of bollocks to her.

Jackman25

humberklog wrote: »

I think Gemma's is a nasty creep but getting her shut down every time isn't right.

Sneaky unpleasant arseholes on both sides in this case.

Yep, looking at twitter comments you have the full basket of deplorables on both sides of the argument.

If I actually gave a **** and thought Gemma was dangerous and needed to be stopped, I would be encouraging people to give her a platform. I would support having her on Prime Time, Six-One, Main Stream Radio etc. Any half-competent interviewer would fillet her within minutes.

This no-platform stuff plays right into her hands and makes her the victim, and I suspect most of these social media activists know that, but its more important to them to be seen to be an activist than actually achieving anything.

Billcarson

That there is alot of corruption in this country. I don't trust 5g btw or at least I feel uneasy about it, there has not been enough research done into it.
Mass migration I don't agree with. Every country has a right to protect its borders. We can't just let anybody in here. But anyone who doesn't agree with mass
Migration is considered rasist . I think it will only lead to problems down the road.

Admittedly she perhaps paints an overly poor view of Ireland and can be a bit ott. But if rather trust her then our gov.

[Deleted User]

Billcarson wrote: »

That there is alot of corruption in this country. I don't trust 5g btw or at least I feel uneasy about it, there has not been enough research done into it.
Mass migration I don't agree with. Every country has a right to protect its borders. We can't just let anybody in here. But anyone who doesn't agree with mass
Migration is considered rasist . I think it will only lead to problems down the road.

Admittedly she perhaps paints an overly poor view of Ireland and can be a bit ott. But if rather trust her then our gov.

Best get rid of your mobile then and get rid of your broadband connection if you don't trust 5g.

And yes the rest of your post is exactly what you claim it seems

Acosta

After watching her latest video, If I was the owner of that place I'd lock the doors.

Annasopra

Billcarson wrote: »

Where's your evidence for this???

It has been widely noted on social media that someone who questioned her at The Pillo Hotel in Ashbourne was escorted from the room by private security. There are questions about alleged assault too. The videos had to be taken down so that the Gardai could investigate

Gemma had a video up a few weeks openly harassing Fiona O'Leary an autism campaigner saying Fiona "should be dealt with" - again tgis had to be taken down because the Gardai are investigating

Its well known Gemma has been sending out dozens of solicitors letters. #suemegemma on twitter has documented this.

Annasopra

skepticalme wrote: »

There you go again throwing around statements without any evidence.
Having just been an observer of what is going on, it's disgraceful.
Gemma's critics are in no danger of being silenced, they are thugs who threaten businesses and threaten to show up at meetings to cause trouble.
This will end in violence and it won't be G O Dohertys fault.

Nah Gemma is actively encouraging violence from her supporters towards Fiona O'Leary.

Its kinda odd how you keep trying to minimise the harrassment and bullying that Gemma does.

But then Gemmas supporters do this here constantly. Try to deflect and pretend Gemma is innocent and virtuous. She isnt. She's a bully who harasses and tries to silence her critics.

skepticalme

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Nah Gemma is actively encouraging violence from her supporters towards Fiona O'Leary.

Its kinda odd how you keep trying to minimise the harrassment and bullying that Gemma does.

But then Gemmas supporters do this here constantly. Try to deflect and pretend Gemma is innocent and virtuous. She isnt. She's a bully who harasses and tries to silence her critics.

She meant deal with Fiona OLeary legally, which is obvious to anyone who looks at the video.

Autism advocate my ass. None of the autism parent groups would touch her with a barge pole. She has even gone after some of them who are dealing with severely autistic children.

You're constantly lying. That's what I oppose.

Annasopra

skepticalme wrote: »

She meant deal with Fiona OLeary legally, which is obvious to anyone who looks at the video.

Autism advocate my ass. None of the autism parent groups would touch her with a barge pole. She has even gone after some of them who are dealing with severely autistic children.

You're constantly lying. That's what I oppose.

Ah right once again you twist O'Dohertys words to your interpretation.

Nope no lying here.

O'Doherty harassed and bullied O'Leary

batgoat

skepticalme wrote: »

She meant deal with Fiona OLeary legally, which is obvious to anyone who looks at the video.

Autism advocate my ass. None of the autism parent groups would touch her with a barge pole. She has even gone after some of them who are dealing with severely autistic children.

You're constantly lying. That's what I oppose.

She really is an autism advocate, she exposed a group that were effectively poisoning children with bleach. Gemma is well aware of the fact that she has plenty of followers who will do some pretty questionable harassment of Fiona. Your love for all things Gemma and making Fiona out to be the bad person is pretty cringe.

Dr Brown

It's another very sad day for democracy in Ireland.

People may not like Gemma but to deny her the right to speak is putting Ireland on the road to fascism were the rule of law is ignored and only those the left wing mob agree with are allowed to speak.

Its funny that none of there anti democratic thugs seem to have a problem with the likes of FG/FF holding conferences when they're the ones who destroyed the country. But they will attack likes of Gemma who is trying to stamp out corruption.

ohnonotgmail

Dr Brown wrote: »

It's another very sad day for democracy in Ireland.

People may not like Gemma but to deny her the right to speak is putting Ireland on the road to fascism were the rule of law is ignored and only those the left wing mob agree with are allowed to speak.

Its funny that none of there anti democratic thugs seem to have a problem with the likes of FG/FF holding conferences when they're the ones who destroyed the country. But they will attack likes of Gemma who is trying to stamp out corruption.

well its no surprise that you support her

Boom_Bap

Paraphrasing Gemma:

"there are hundreds of people who have travelled here tonight"....as the camera pans to 6 cars and 3 people

Screen_Shot_2017_01_20_at_11.04.49_AM.0.png

Screen_Shot_2017_01_20_at_11.04.49_AM.0.png

suttree31

Dr Brown wrote: »

It's another very sad day for democracy in Ireland.

People may not like Gemma but to deny her the right to speak is putting Ireland on the road to fascism were the rule of law is ignored and only those the left wing mob agree with are allowed to speak.

Its funny that none of there anti democratic thugs seem to have a problem with the likes of FG/FF holding conferences when they're the ones who destroyed the country. But they will attack likes of Gemma who is trying to stamp out corruption.

Spare us your concern for Irish democracy - do FG/FF regularly use the phrase "traitors to Ireland" for people who disagree with them? GO'D throws it around like cheap confetti - she used it for people who watch the Late Late Show. There's only risk to putting Ireland on the road to fascism is allowing that kind of bile to have a platform.

Dr Brown

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

well its no surprise that you support her

I'm not a member of her organization.

But I support free speech and lawful assembly.

Maurice Yeltsin

I'm still baffled as to what the left fear from her aside from her hoovering up their voters. Because that is who votes left in Ireland. The unemployable. The conspiracy theorists. The freemen on the land. It's simple jealously, Gemma is stealing your retards and you want your retards back, so that they can vote again for your preferred retards. Former heroes like her and Ben Gilroy have spoken out of turn and are influencing too many of the permanently angry.

Have you actually listened to her live streams?

I didn't last more than 10 minutes. She's inarticulate. She's a poor orator. She's VERY boring. I'm loathe to give Ruth Coppinger a credit but even her scuttering nonsense comes across marginally better.

She's a touring comedy act, and you're sadder than she is for even caring.

ohnonotgmail

Dr Brown wrote: »

I'm not a member of her organization.

But I support free speech and lawful assembly.

well that is odd because gemma doesn't. Or should i say she supports her own free speech. She isn't so keen on the free speech of those who oppose her.

Dr Brown

suttree31 wrote: »

Spare us your concern for Irish democracy - do FG/FF regularly use the phrase "traitors to Ireland" for people who disagree with them? GO'D throws it around like cheap confetti - she used it for people who watch the Late Late Show. There's only risk to putting Ireland on the road to fascism is allowing that kind of bile to have a platform.

FF/FG are traitors to the country I thought that would be obvious to anyone with half a brain.

Maurice Yeltsin

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

well that is odd because gemma doesn't. Or should i say she supports her own free speech. She isn't so keen on the free speech of those who oppose her.

A lot of people are saying she is anti free speech because her security removed protesters from her meetings by force. (I'm baffled she has the funds to hire security, or even a function room, but anyway)

Out of interest, if a left wing group were holding a meeting about something they claimed to care about, say, the housing crisis, and I walked in and demanded to debate how one can claim to be for resolving a housing crisis while approving of preferential social housing treatment for refugees, would I be allowed the floor? Or would I be escorted out?

Serious question.

ohnonotgmail

Funny the number of low post count recent joiners that support gemma