overpronator wrote: Had 35.15 on the watch this morning but the course was a bit short. You can add 20 or 30 secs if we're being fair about it, still a 35 min run and would have been a massive PB. I was pretty annoyed for the five minutes after but what can you do, It's good progress so I have to be happy. 5.45 pace for 10k seemed a million miles away in Jan and I felt very strong today. Will throw up a report in the next day or so.
Swashbuckler wrote: » overpronator wrote: Had 35.15 on the watch this morning but the course was a bit short. You can add 20 or 30 secs if we're being fair about it, still a 35 min run and would have been a massive PB. I was pretty annoyed for the five minutes after but what can you do, It's good progress so I have to be happy. 5.45 pace for 10k seemed a million miles away in Jan and I felt very strong today. Will throw up a report in the next day or so. Did you run with Healy? Almost identical time.
scotindublin wrote: » Great run roday S.....bit annoying about the course but still a cracking time. Great progress; rest the legs and give Dunboyne a good rattle next week!
overpronator wrote: » Same to you mate, you're flying. You tempted by Dunboyne?
Murph_D wrote: » It’s hardly a terrible time all the same, S, is it? But as you say you had your day last week. Back-to-back 10ks sounds like a tall order to me. You’re obviously in very decent shape.
healy1835 wrote: » What's in the plans next Shane?
overpronator wrote: » Thats the question. Think I'm gonna go for the Clontarf 10 miler. This is the closest I've been to a realistic shot at sub 60, pb is 60.55. Has anyone done that race actually?
healy1835 wrote: » That's Easter Sunday right? Never did it.....You've a few decent LRs in the bag in addition to some great races & consistent sessions. I'd say <60mins is there for you. Would I be right in guessing that if the course is in and around St Anne's that it couldn't be too tough of a course?