squawker wrote: » why do pubs still do the two pint pour? the low cask / high cask system of pouring a pint just doesn't exist anymore is it now just a case of tradition?
Benjamin Vast Apostrophe wrote: » Because it’s necessary to get a proper pint
squawker wrote: » but its not, nitro in the barrels is regulated and its all from the same batch the two pint pour is irrelevant these days Taken from http://allaboutbeer.com/man-invented-nitro-guinness/ To give you a sense of what they were trying to replace, here’s how Martyn Cornell describes Irish Guinness in Amber, Gold, and Black: “In the pub, the casks containing this highly conditioned beer were known as ‘high,’ while casks containing maturer, less lively beer were know as ‘low.’ Publicans would fill glasses three-quarters full from the ‘low cask’ and then top them up with foaming beer from the ‘high cask.’ The ‘high’ and ‘low’ cask system was in use until at least the 1960s.” Ash recalled this himself. “The barman would take a whole minute to fill one glass. He had to get a low pressure cask over a period of time and then the high pressure one, and he had to mix them. He had to be very skilled, the Irish publican, because it took a minute to get a glass. Every barman had his own process. It was all very amusing.”
Benjamin Vast Apostrophe wrote: » But it is, I’ve had one pint pours and they just aren’t the same. The head is never right for a start.
squawker wrote: » I call placebo on that one, there will be no difference except the head might be a bit bigger on the odd pint
OldMrBrennan83 wrote: » Bigger on most. And bigger is unacceptable.
squawker wrote: » but does this change the taste?
Benjamin Vast Apostrophe wrote: » Much better from a can than a bottle imo but nothing beats a pint from the tap, absolute nectar (provided it’s a good pint that is).
Pinch Flat wrote: » Draft is a relatively new thing.
demanufactured wrote: » I like a pint of leann foilin myself. It's a tastey sup. Unfortunately nowhere near me has it at the moment.
Ush1 wrote: » Isn't stout and any decent beers supposed to be served room temperature? If you want it cold you probably actually don't like the taste.
hetuzozaho wrote: » Most people just don't like the taste. Its funny hearing them talk about a bottle of Guinness the way they do. That's how Guinness tastes, you don't like it, that's fine, we have nitro Guinness for that. And then they'll harp on about pint of plains being your only man I'm sure Flann enjoyed an ol bottle of stout. Was he even drinking nitro at the time ha?
Benjamin Vast Apostrophe wrote: » Stout needs to be chilled, not freezing as it is in many places but definitely cooled. Room temp Guinness is awful.
Truckermal wrote: » Cheers everyone especially Jayzeus and Mr. Nox....:D:D
corner of hells wrote: » How did you get your pint to balance sideways ?
ben.schlomo wrote: » That's only good for stuff with no flavour, like Guinness. You can't have a quality stout served cold.
Larbre34 wrote: » ben.schlomo wrote: » That's only good for stuff with no flavour, like Guinness. You can't have a quality stout served cold. Stout snobbery eh? I bet you put your red wine on the radiator and all. You absolutely can have quality stouts served colder than room temp, I've had some beautiful ones