Colby Jealous Menswear wrote: » China has a sixth (seventh?) of the population of the planet and are industrialising in a massive scale. hardly surprising they're number one. And they're hardly communist.
Colby Jealous Menswear wrote: » Countless generations of humans managed to live their lives without destorying the planet for their children. We're the abnormality, the wrong ones.Destory capitalism, not the planet. Get rid of your pensions and "invest" in local ground level political action aimed at overthrowing the current order.
Autosport wrote: » If I knew then what I know now I wouldn't have bothered starting a pension. Is it too late for me I'm only in the pension 15 years
wexandproud wrote: » i think before this thread goes any further , the OP should clarify if its going to be about saving the planet or saving for retirement . just so we'll know before anybody gets in too deep
razorblunt wrote: » c) They don't.
Del2005 wrote: » It's a very big assumption that people are destroying the planet. Humans are having an impact but the Earth will still be here long after any trace of humans ever existing has disappeared. The madness is overpopulation but no one is willing to pay the price to solve it.
Colby Jealous Menswear wrote: » Hands up who has any idea what's in their pension. I encourage everyone foolish enough to have one to go and examine it closely. What 99% of people will find is a) you're being screwed on fees by the provider b) there might be a company appointed "financial advisor" taking a bit of your pie for absolutely nothing c) that your investments are in companies making weapons of war, energy companies destroying the planet, big tobacco and big pharma etc etc Congrats! Your helping to destroy the planet! And not only that, you're being ripped off along the way This madness has got to stop. How can someone contribute to this is amazing to me. We all need to make a stand and stop greasing the wheels of this destruction.
evolving_doors wrote: » over population isn't a problem. ... Population will settle at 11bn eventually
Del2005 wrote: » The problem is over population. So to protect humans still being able to survive on Earth the obvious ethical opinion is to invest in companies which reduce the population not increase it. So big tobacco, oil and military are good and life saving companies are bad.
Colby Jealous Menswear wrote: » 1 - Let's not have a system where everyone funds the destruction of the planet, the raping of the third world and the proliferation of war. 2 - Now we're at a good stage. Let's get together and discuss. I propose a radical overhaul of the global economy to one for people rather than for the current madness. No reason the government in this system couldn't be the one that provides for people from cradle to grave.
[Deleted User] wrote: » We're only pawns in his game.
Del2005 wrote: » The madness is overpopulation but no one is willing to pay the price to solve it.
Colby Jealous Menswear wrote: Congrats! Your helping to destroy the planet! And not only that, you're being ripped off along the way
evolving_doors wrote: » Ok so rule out airlines. Gotcha. How about pharmaceutical companies helping us to live better and longer?
Deleted User wrote: » We're only pawns in a game.
xckjoo wrote: » Is this thread for real?
Colby Jealous Menswear wrote: » Depends. Do you think for instance that Ryanair, Aer Lingus, BA etc are ethical? By karting yobbos on two week pisups at dirt cheap prices they're contributing massively to climate change.