dxhound2005 wrote: » Divorce is very common in the UK for people who never won the Lotto.
murpho999 wrote: I read some where yesterday one of the family members said that the win "won't change their lives". Heard this said before by numerous Lotto winners. Why do they buy tickets then if they don't want a large life changing win?
Jet Black wrote: » Everyone in the Naul knows who they are so they are guaranteed not to live their life in peace with people looking for money off them. Ordinary life is over for them now. A guy I worked with said he knew someone who won a million, went the pub and looked after everyone for the night. Everyone was calling him a stingy bastard for not giving them money. You can't win. If he gave them all a few grand he'd still be stingy for only giving a few grand after winning a million.
fryup wrote: » they got 175 mill, if they were to give a grand to each household in the country wouldn't it be a lovely gesture
Del.Monte wrote: » You have to laugh though, apparently, the family syndicate are all retired and say they don't want the win to change their lives! Why do the feckin thing then?
NIMAN wrote: » I always thought a sum of money this large could ruin a family for generations. Imagine if a couple with teenage kids won that. Kids might switch off, forget about education and ever working. And with the amount, their kids could do same and so on.
W123-80's wrote: » I honestly think its far too much money and the jackpot should be broken into lots of smaller amounts, 1/2 million for example. That is a far more manageable sum and would make a positive difference of lots of peoples lives.
idle wrote: » FFS very few of these syndicate wins are actual syndicate wins. One family member wins the jackpot. They plan on sharing it with the family and don’t want to pay tax on it so they say it’s a syndicate.
Wibbs wrote: » Well his point was it's significantly higher among large lotto winners. Three or four times higher IIRC. The number who go broke in a few years after winning the "smaller" sums of a few millions is quite high too. While a million sounds like and is a lot of money and if you're frugal and can manage money it would make a big difference in the average life, but if you go even slightly nuts and can't manage money you could piss through it remarkably easily. I know someone who out of the blue inherited around three mill from an externally "poor" bachelor uncle and it was pretty much gone after about five years with little to show for it. It's just something people say, almost as if they're expected to say it as they've heard it themselves from previous winners. Like those who say they won't stop going into work/we'll stay in the house we've always lived in etc. It's all bollocks of course. Any lotto win/sudden large windfall is life changing, when it's tens of millions it's massively life changing. If it had been a single winner of that kinda cash their lives would change almost unrecognisably.
Deleted User wrote: » Not sure if anyone has pointed it out in this thread yet but I've linked the sources in After Hours before:Chances of winning Euromillions = 140,000,000 to 1 Chances of being struck by lightning: 300,000 to 1. Yet people still buy tickets for this racket. These, and many other relevant odds for other gambling products, should be publicised on ads for lottery products. The statistical realities of what the pushers of this escapism are selling should be on each of their products. With those odds, it really is a tax on stupidity. I hope no atheist is hypocritical enough to buy a ticket/ believe they could possibly win. In terms of fanciful odds, to hope in such a win must be up there with those people who hope that a divine god exists.
dxhound2005 wrote: » I had an accident 6 months ago which resulted in a broken bone. On balance I would have preferred to win the Lotto.
buried wrote: » Well I was in an accident when I was a kid I went flying out the windscreen of a car and a then went a good few feet down the road. As long as that don't happen again I'll take it as winning the lotto. In fact I already have
dxhound2005 wrote: » You have the best of both worlds. You are saving a fortune by not doing the Lotto. But when one of your relatives wins they will give you a load of cash.
NIMAN wrote: » I see the winners of the €175m are moaning about their win, how they feel like they are in jail.
Dale Doback wrote: » Not moaning about the win, moaning about the publicity and pressure to give interviews. Also the fact that their identities were leaked by someone, no doubt a close friend or other family member. Id be pissed too, although, I wouldnt be giving any interviews.
realdanbreen wrote: » Hi Ray D'Arcy. If you had your way a fella wouldn't be able to have a pint or a flutter now and then. There's more to life than doing push ups and ating beans & nuts!
Wibbs wrote: » Indeed. I wouldn't be a regular lotto ticket buyer, but I'll have a punt on a line when it goes over the oul 100 millions, for the craic like. And for some reason I'm apparently luckier than the average bear. Since the start of this year I've won over 250 quid on the few tickets I've bought(only got 4 quid IIRC on the last giant one). Not gold plated Ferrari money, but still. Actually the very first (Irish) lotto ticket I bought back in the 80's I won nearly 3000 punts. Down the years I'd say I've won close to ten grand on it. Granted I'd only buy maybe six or seven tickets a year, but I seem to win around 30-50% of the tickets I buy and easily recoup the couple of quid outlay. On the other hand I know folks who play on the regular who almost never win.