howsitgoingboy wrote: » Yes i'd assume so. But 'a bit' could be just a puff of a joint. That's what i was wondering. Surely getting high would lead you to not being in control of some of your actions? therefore that's why it shouldn't be legalized.
Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: » Well, it's more a case of how I know what I know, than a case of what I do. It also amazes me how my posts only ever "not make sense" to people who never do drugs. Strange one that...
dodderangler wrote: » Yes of course there’s a drug problem. It’s blatantly obvious. I’d say about 70% of people in a pub at any time is on coke. Weed hash is no longer a massive issue. Coke is the main problem. MDMA is more s country thing. Ketamine is huge among younger groups. 18-25 year olds. Because it’s cheap as ****. Speaking from my past as someone that couldn’t go for s pint without cocaine it’s too easy to get and doesn’t take much persuasion to get some. So yes we do have s massive drug problem
turdball wrote: » Maybe I don't go to the **** holes that you do but 70 per cent of every pub in Ireland?? Come on like that is ridiculous. What drug are you on now?
dodderangler wrote: » Bars? How American of you. Guess you don’t live in Dublin either do you. I was in the pub last night and there was lads in their 60s in sniffing away. Groups of young lads going in together and sniffing away. So yes I reckon about 70% of people do it in a pub.
SortingYouOut wrote: » They're dead right though, I've seen a number of different friend groups grow up through college (in the last 5 years) and the go to were cheaper drugs like E's, Ket and MDMA, as it was muck cheap. These same groups now have moved on to Coke because they can afford it with full time jobs.
greenspurs wrote: » I think youre just here to declare you take drugs ? Because most of the rest of your posts don't make sense, and aren't realistic !!
Sleepy wrote: » Our main problem with most drugs is that we allow illegal drug dealers to sell them instead of legalising them and reaping the taxation benefits. I'm a 38 year old man, if I want to smoke a bit of marijuana that shouldn't be anyone else's business unless I get behind the wheel of a car whilst under the influence (or similar).
SortingYouOut wrote: » Is getting 'high' not the point of smoking the stuff?
SortingYouOut wrote: » 70% is a ridiculous figure.
Shoelaces wrote: » Not even slightly. Heroin figures have steadily dropped and we have next to no use of crack in the country thank jaysus. As for Coke, its used but not on the 70% in a pub (ha!) some lad was saying above. Drugs are there but its not INCREDIBLY easy to get them. Only so much to go around once it finally reaches this part of Europe.
Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: » Not doubting the first bit - E is much cheaper and much easier to get that cocaine. I'd rather pay more though, than buy something when "God only knows what;s in them". The last part is is bull**** though. Why the hell would someone risk jail and **** knows what else to sell at "dirt cheap" prices...?
howsitgoingboy wrote: » Just a general Q to your point. I know you said a 'a bit' of marijuana but what about the people who don't want 'a bit' and want more until they're high. Would it not get out of hand a bit? Just being curious.
turdball wrote: » Coke is not the choice for younger people. Ketamine,Speed(horrible drug) and the number one drugs ecstacy and Weed. And about people talking about it openly on a sports team, doesn't happen. Coke is more of a drug for the middle class, it's not abused as much as pills and Ketamine by younger people And 70% of people in bars are on coke? Haha,
yourdeadwright wrote: » " Coke is more of a drug for the middle class " 1990 is that you ?
enricoh wrote: » No offence princess consuela but u haven't a clue. U can get 4 e's for a tenner where i am, god only knows whats in them. All the new designer drugs dirt cheap too. Difficult to get - hilarious, harder for a 15 year old to get cans than drugs.
Muckka wrote: » Of course, sure I did. Nothing better than being a novelty, I was intrigued with them as much as they me.
dodderangler wrote: » Guess you don’t live in Dublin then do you
Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: » Another ad homeinem. Guess you don't, then.