Obvious Desperate Breakfasts wrote: » The dramatics. ‘Shut down’ and ‘shout down’ have to be the most overused phrases on boards.ie. Some delicate questioning by two users and suddenly we want the thread closed down? I’ve no doubt it will keep rumbling on and I have very little power in getting threads closed nor would it be something I’d bother to seek very often. Another user and I are just wondering what more could be said at this stage. Very mild criticism. Very mild. I have to say, I often find the deployment of the terms ‘shut down’ and ‘shout down’ to be a sly silencing tactic in itself.
KrustyUCC wrote: » Well she posted this earlier Also a few stories about the homeless sleeping out in the cold I'm not sure the meeting with the Council Monday went well "Well gud nite and God bless fb plz keep me and my kids wrapped in ur prayers. god bless use all" When u moving in? Did you get your house hun xxx .... Radio silence from Mags
KrustyUCC wrote: » No not at allI do find it funny when people's first contributions are basically to just want to shut down the thread So we have you, tatranska, Vicarious Function, Babooshka and various others just pop up 'questioning the longevity of the thread', the thread title or wanting the thread closed Plenty of time left to run in this story and plenty left to say until Margaret gets her forever home
punisher5112 wrote: » Any Cash news.....
Obvious Desperate Breakfasts wrote: » I’ve been reading the thread on and off as it has been a front-pager for months now. Believe it or not, you can read threads without commenting. Usually perennial front-page threads are of a different nature. It’s unusual for a thread on a particular news story to do so. It’s not outlandish to comment on that. Anyway, are you the arbiter of what passes for a quality post on this thread? What qualifications are needed for that job?
KrustyUCC wrote: » What a brilliant first contribution Fair play to you
Plumbthedepths wrote: » I can't believe you don't know how to unfollow a thread or ignore a thread you disagree with
KrustyUCC wrote: » What a neck is right That's still not good enough for her as it's "not our forever home"
Kaysen Vast Blueberry wrote: » I can't believe this thread is still going on 4 months after it started. Do people have nothing better to do than worry themselves about Margaret Nash?
punisher5112 wrote: » The way things are going it will be workers with zero rights and thieving backstards will have it all...... Wait a minute it's already like this but can you imagine in 50 years how bad it's going to be with what's happening now....
Kaysen Vast Blueberry wrote: I can't believe this thread is still going on 4 months after it started. Do people have nothing better to do than worry themselves about Margaret Nash?
punisher5112 wrote: » I wonder has she any tips on how to get car insurance. I'm driving since 2001, full no claims but as I had a trade policy and going to private even though this policy included private and in my own name I can't get insurance. I'm only able to get quotes as a no experience driver.
KrustyUCC wrote: » "My life. My choices. My problems. My mistakes. My Lessons. Not your business. Mind your own problems before you talk about mine. My life is not your story to tell"
NIMAN wrote: » Is there any penalties against people making fraudulent claims?
deaddonkey15 wrote: » I'm in the exact same boat as you. It was one of the stupidest things I've seen written on this site.
DavidLyons_ wrote: » Holy fcuk!! I have that poster blocked (and with very good reason) so only see their posts when they’re quoted. That is an utterly repugnant comparison to make. Absolutely disgusting. Sadly, I would expect nothing less from such a person though.
Johnny Jukebox wrote: » Party members who don't play the anti-Traveller card won't get re-elected, particularly in South County Dublin. Very few people will vote for a politician who is trying to increase the number of travellers in their area. That's the reality, irrespective of the party spin.