facehugger99 wrote: » Doubt it. It's because hardy anyone would want to swap places with her because I'd imagine her life isn't exactly a barrel of laughs - it's certainly a lot ****tier than my life. You should ask yourself if you're kicking up or kicking down. Of course you wouldn't be be able to harvest as many 'thanks' from those kinds of considerations , so, rabble, rabble ,rabble, etc.
BattleCorp wrote: » Hopefully I'll stay in paid employment and contribute my tax take towards her forever house. :(:(:(:(
Deebles McBeebles wrote: » Hopefully there won't be anything to pity. Hopefully she realises what she's been given. Hopefully the kids will be well behaved neighbours. Hopefully it will be reported without bias in the media if not.
irishrover99 wrote: » Really pity her new neighbours
Sweet.Science wrote: » Has she moved to the hub yet ? She wont be happy paying €50 a week
facehugger99 wrote: » Despite the AH obsession with all the free stuff she gets, I doubt many would trade places with her.
tretorn wrote: » Didnt someone calculate it at 50k nett pay. She would be on about 80k gross to have the income transferred from taxpayers to her bank account.
facehugger99 wrote: » You should ask yourself if you're kicking up or kicking down.
Bob the Builder wrote: » Just to clarify, that's €84k a year net pay... i.e. take-home pay. So you would need to be on a salary of €140,000 per year to have the same amount of take-home pay. Or €120,000 salary if you're factoring in seven children and claiming child allowance as part of your income.
freshpopcorn wrote: » Most people's sence of decency!
Ulysses Gaze wrote: » €84,000 a year and a free house in the location she wants.
punisher5112 wrote: » Explain? Get paid to have a huge family and do nothing and get paid some more.... Sounds pretty good. Travellers in general are a wash with cash and not mags cash I mean...
gmisk wrote: » That is definitely hers and there attitude, but as far as I know Ireland doesn't have a right to housing via the constitution or in law?
facehugger99 wrote: » What's stopping you so? - off with you.
KrustyUCC wrote: » Sure she's entitled to it "No matter what I have done in my past, it doesn't take away from the fact that I have a right to be housed." Same attitude from her supporters
punisher5112 wrote: » Get paid to have a huge family and do nothing and get paid some more.... Sounds pretty good. Travellers in general are a wash with cash and not mags cash I mean...
Ruraldweller56 wrote: » I'd love to know from those commenting on her myfacepage in what way does she 'deserve' the house? What exactly does she 'deserve' it for?