grogi wrote: » A scooter like that is not really suitable to be driven on a road - rather cycle paths and walkways. But it still is very fast - and it is very easy to make serious harm - hurt a pedestrian when riding a scooter like that. I am all for making our transport much more sustainable. But as it stands, just making them legal is a recipe for disaster IMHO. They really would need to be seriously limited - to ~10 kmh - to be allowed to be used without insurance and driving license.
quarryman wrote: » Still loving my Zoom Stryder. About 450km done on it now. The best part is the full suspension. I don’t know how anyone clocks up miles on the M365 without any suspension on it. I love bunny hopping off the odd kerb on my way home. My advice: don’t cheap out on the models with no suspension. Irish roads just aren’t made for it.
loyatemu wrote: » do you have proof they're more dangerous? Pedestrians have been killed by cyclists but it's incredibly rare, I don't think the risk from scooters is likely to be much higher (they weigh about the same as a bike but I assume most of that weight is in the base in the form of batteries).
the death rate on shared Lime and Bike e-scooters is roughly one per 10.75 million trips. There have been just two bike share deaths nationwide, making the death rate roughly one for every 61.5 million trips,
grogi wrote: » Bicycles do require you to pedal - going fast is hard - and have much bigger wheels - thus navigating the potholes is easier. Electric scooter is much more dangerous and I wouldn't like to see any wanker going around on one. I also don't believe that Gardai will be able to keep them under control.
Shefwedfan wrote: » They are rated at that speed when a mouse is on them.....unfortunately the oversized Irish man will restrict the speed a bit....first time I stood up on the M365 the tyre blew out with the weight of me :P:P:P I joke, but not a chance in hell with an adult they get close to that speed. My sister in law took the M365 for a spin. She is very petite and it didn't get up to that speed.
grogi wrote: » I count myself lucky then - I literally have no idea what you're talking about...
beauf wrote: » You're only looking at low end ones. There are many more, This one does 30kphhttps://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=109080662&postcount=417 This one 40kphhttps://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=108801308&postcount=363
drunkmonkey wrote: » Don't agree it's more dangerous than a bicycle. It stops quickly and doesn't go near as fast. When did we become so soft that scooting was seen as dangerous.
antodeco wrote: » Sure the Gardai cant even keep scramblers under control!
Shefwedfan wrote: » Hard to control. How many scrambles and little quads are flying around the green areas in Dublin? no license/insurance/tax nothing......they can go alot quicker than a scooter.....
antodeco wrote: » Problem is that they will need to implement it for cycling as well. If it's just based on speed, bicycles can go faster. It gets messy quickly!
quarryman wrote: » I emailed him and he said it needed to be redrafted. Didn’t get the impression anything was going to happen soon.
Eire Go Brach wrote: » And here we go again. The thread is like a circle.
cojomo2 wrote: » Anyone know of any update on Noel Rock's attempt to update the law to explicitly allow electric scooters?
cojomo2 wrote: » The law on this is still open to interpretation. RSA site states the following: "If it can be powered by mechanical or electrical power alone (i.e. it can go without you pedalling or scooting it) then it is considered to be a mechanically propelled vehicle (MPV)." One could argue both ways on above..the Xiaomi cannot be powered by electrical means alone without first manually scooting it. Equally, it could be argued that when manually brought up to speed, it can be powered by battery alone. The law is is open to interpretation on models such as the Xiaomi...if you are unfortunate enough to be involved in a serious accident on a model that doesnt require a manual assist to get going, you have no argument.
antodeco wrote: » Surely if you have "open drive" on your car policy, you are insured on one of these? It is defined as a "vehicle".
beauf wrote: » It's a pity the legal definition isn't about being assisted start then. It's about it cutting off power if assistance is removed. None of them do that. Which means that all these scooters are equal legally. With the exception one the micro onehttps://www.micro-step.nl/en/falcon.html Which has a true assist mode. They should just make them all legal. It's a great solution to congestion.
Garibaldi? wrote: » Could you take one on the bus?
cojomo2 wrote: » ....On the.legal bit, surely thats open to interpretation, as it could be argued that it is assisted ....