antodeco wrote: » Interesting. I wonder would it be covered under the bike to work scheme?
CFC007 wrote: » Cancelled the one on geek in the end as got a used Xiaomi one. Did a 16km one way commute yesterday. Made it home with 19% battery and that’s with a cfw on it.
beauf wrote: » How are you finding it.
beauf wrote: » No hassle on your route. Where do you leave it at the office. Also where do you put it on the train. They are bigger than I was expecting.
drunkmonkey wrote: » I need to double check I think it's 12mt warranty but could be 2yrs the same as their phones. If it's faulty it's collect and return, they'll pick it up and drop it back to you that's probably worth the premium alone, there was 2 spare tyres in the box and something else I'd have to go find it to check. Legality, by the letter or the law they need tax and insurance but I've passed a good few Garda and only got smiles. Chatting to a chap the other night he had his confiscated but he told them he was on the way home from the pub but they said he could collect it in the morning. It's all down to who you meet.
cojomo2 wrote: » ....On the.legal bit, surely thats open to interpretation, as it could be argued that it is assisted ....
Garibaldi? wrote: » Could you take one on the bus?
beauf wrote: » It's a pity the legal definition isn't about being assisted start then. It's about it cutting off power if assistance is removed. None of them do that. Which means that all these scooters are equal legally. With the exception one the micro onehttps://www.micro-step.nl/en/falcon.html Which has a true assist mode. They should just make them all legal. It's a great solution to congestion.
antodeco wrote: » Surely if you have "open drive" on your car policy, you are insured on one of these? It is defined as a "vehicle".
cojomo2 wrote: » The law on this is still open to interpretation. RSA site states the following: "If it can be powered by mechanical or electrical power alone (i.e. it can go without you pedalling or scooting it) then it is considered to be a mechanically propelled vehicle (MPV)." One could argue both ways on above..the Xiaomi cannot be powered by electrical means alone without first manually scooting it. Equally, it could be argued that when manually brought up to speed, it can be powered by battery alone. The law is is open to interpretation on models such as the Xiaomi...if you are unfortunate enough to be involved in a serious accident on a model that doesnt require a manual assist to get going, you have no argument.
Eire Go Brach wrote: » And here we go again. The thread is like a circle.
cojomo2 wrote: » Anyone know of any update on Noel Rock's attempt to update the law to explicitly allow electric scooters?
quarryman wrote: » I emailed him and he said it needed to be redrafted. Didn’t get the impression anything was going to happen soon.
grogi wrote: » A scooter like that is not really suitable to be driven on a road - rather cycle paths and walkways. But it still is very fast - and it is very easy to make serious harm - hurt a pedestrian when riding a scooter like that. I am all for making our transport much more sustainable. But as it stands, just making them legal is a recipe for disaster IMHO. They really would need to be seriously limited - to ~10 kmh - to be allowed to be used without insurance and driving license.
antodeco wrote: » Problem is that they will need to implement it for cycling as well. If it's just based on speed, bicycles can go faster. It gets messy quickly!