Pete_Cavan wrote: » Defo get rid of Monreal although he won't free up much funds, Kola is a good option. I'd ditch Hazard before Sane, Chelsea seem to be in a bit of a rut atm and City will be boosted by last nights win and have good fixtures. It also gives you a lot more options in terms of allocating funds.
The real mccoy 91 wrote: » Could do haz to sterling and Monreal to robbo? I'm not pushed on kola as I've learnt my lesson with arsenal defenders
Pete_Cavan wrote: » That would certainly leave you with a very strong midfield but doesn't address the lack of a premium striker which was your initial concern. You could keep Monreal for another GW or two (you have other defenders to use) and get the balance you want in midfield and up top first, be it 5 strong mids or having a bench fodder mid with a premium striker. I personally don't like doubling up on any teams defense, even Liverpools, but maybe it's something you are comfortable with. I wouldn't dismiss Kola that quickly, he is a serious assist threat and attracts plenty of bonus points and is cheap enough to justify leaving on the bench when they play the top teams.
eh i dunno wrote: » Clyne going to Bournemouth could be a decent asset for the next few months
SlickRic wrote: » I'm open to thoughts on this. 2 FTs. I've been a keen proponent of having Pogba, but is he worth sacrificing in order to get Sterling in? Pogba ----> Sterling Kane ----> Rashford it would leave me with: Fabianski Hamer VVD Laporte Yedlin AWB Bennett Salah Sterling Sane Ricky Deulofeu Rashford Jimenez Wilson my other option is to get rid of Kane for Aguero for a week, roll the transfer, reassess, and leave Sterling for another week. obviously i won't do anything before the cup games are done.
Morzadec wrote: » A lot of talk about selling Kane, not sure what I'm missing? Bang on form, home to a United side that is struggling to keep clean sheets, Spurs banging in goals, and then very tasty fixtures right after. Seems to be due to a desire to fund Aggy, but Wolves don't roll over. He looked good against Liverpool but gassed after about 70. I see him hooked on 60-70 again in the next few games. Maybe there's an argument if on a wildy but not sure I'd use a transfer on it. Kane is hot property at the moment, a more stable option than Agueor imo
Morzadec wrote: » Aggy wildy
SlickRic wrote: » my issue is I want Sterling or Aguero without selling Sane.
km79 wrote: » Jason puncheon heavily linked with Huddersfield 4.2 mid
razorblunt wrote: » Was McCarthy injured for Southampton's last game or does the new manager see something in Gunn? Would be handy to bank the Fabianski cash and bench option to cover my Allison and Robertson defence.
Father Hernandez wrote: » 4.4 too, expected him to be more Interesting
Pete_Cavan wrote: » I am not convinced by Rashford, I feel anyone who doesn't have him (myself included) has missed the boat. His game time will almost certainly be reduced now and could lose his place entirely quite easily.
km79 wrote: Jason puncheon heavily linked with Huddersfield 4.2 mid
Morzadec wrote: He'll get points if he can nail a place too, proven FF cheapy
Deleted User wrote: » All depends on waether Lukaku can return to form while he has scored 2 goals he has still not looked great to me anyways. Ole did say Rashford could be used on the right or that both could also play up top.
razorblunt wrote: Was McCarthy injured for Southampton's last game or does the new manager see something in Gunn?
Shedite27 wrote: They bought Gunn for 13m in the summer so there's definitely a decent keeper there
km79 wrote: » oh my word.........i have .1 to spare for........martial to puncheon and.......mitrovic to aguero .....giving me a frontline of auba aguero and kane.......and more time to think about WC whilst also bringing in a captain and FF fav. Sorry siggy you will have to wait Still wpnt have salah.......
CSWS101 wrote: » What would your midfield be?