bilston wrote: » Butler and Coetzee are 50/50?
connachta wrote: » Stats do not mean everything. They still mean something. The S-AF is used more often as a better carrier. Butler is lighter as I said, but not less effective to gain ground. And pretty simalar defender (1 tackle each 5 minute-period for Marcel, 1 tackle each 6 minute-period for Jarrod). Coetzee Apparences 14 Min Played 986 Tries 2 Passes Completed 49 Metres Gained 277 Carries 185 Defenders Beaten 35 Tackles 191 Butler Appearances 11 Minutes Played 862 Try 1 Passes Completed 42 Metres Gained 240 Carries 83 Defenders Beaten 12 Tackles 141
irishgrover wrote: » pretty disapointing that you went and learned to do a table properly and then posted this monstrosity... :-)
joseywhales wrote: » If coetzee was irish qualified I'd have him as cover for eight(after stander), he is test level, I don't think Butler is there yet
Clegg wrote: » Godwin on the wing again is a ballsy call. It's not his best position. He got a proper doing over from Adam Byrne last week.
ClanofLams wrote: » Truly shocking to see Leinster supporters living up to the stereotype of obnoxious dicks.
connachta wrote: » (all converted per 100 Minutes played) Head-to-Head | Colby Fainga'a | Jordi Murphy Passes Completed | 5,19 | 3,98 Metres Gained | 21,6 | 12,6 Carries | 13,5 | 11,9 Defenders Beaten | 0,3 | 1 Tackles | 14,7 | 13,9
connachta wrote: » Good for Connacht! And French clubs are not particularly good examples. Big names, small results, some failures.
troyzer wrote: » You made this just so you can deploy your new found table prowess, just admit it.
Burkie1203 wrote: » The stats mean very little. The Ulster lads are playing in Champions Cup. Higher level of rugby. Have you factored that in.
Stats do not mean everything. They still mean something.
connachta wrote: » That matters. A bit I said as a precaution
Burkie1203 wrote: » But you cant use stats to judge players on two different teams with two different coaching teams. Coetzee and Jordi will be the two best backrows on the pitch on Friday. That doesnt mean they will be the two best performers on the night but they have played at a far higher level then anyone else.
Wegians89 wrote: » Butler has 61 super rugby appearances Faingaa has 101 super rugby appearances I’m sure they played some high level stuff. I think Coetzee is the best individual backrow starting and Murphy is probably the second. I do think butler and faingaa are underrated by other provinces fan basis, as Leinster found out last week.
Burkie1203 wrote: » They haven't been playing Super Rugby this season though. My post was about the stats and how they are distorted by the level of opposition.
connachta wrote: » That's exactly what I've been trying to say for 10 days. And the gap, way thinner than most think, may be null or the reverse tomorrow. If you add SOB and Butler, Connacht may have the better back-row. Same was said against Leavy/Doris/Ruddock. Same will be said vs any Munster combo, except the best alltogether (TOD/POM/Stander) And it's about back-row, not overall "green-glasses". As I pointed, Delahunt throws and Leader under high-balls may cost Connacht the game, with more likelihood..
Burkie1203 wrote: » connachta wrote: » That's exactly what I've been trying to say for 10 days. And the gap, way thinner than most think, may be null or the reverse tomorrow. If you add SOB and Butler, Connacht may have the better back-row. Same was said against Leavy/Doris/Ruddock. Same will be said vs any Munster combo, except the best alltogether (TOD/POM/Stander) And it's about back-row, not overall "green-glasses". As I pointed, Delahunt throws and Leader under high-balls may cost Connacht the game, with more likelihood.. On the one hand you big up the Connacht players. On the other you see finishing mid table as a target. Doesn't stack up
Burkie1203 wrote: » On the one hand you big up the Connacht players. On the other you see finishing mid table as a target. Doesn't stack up
troyzer wrote: » They should let you lads play at half time actually, like the minis.
troyzer wrote: » Absolutely wrecked.
troyzer wrote: » If I'm one of those posters, I do apologise. I've been a bit of a **** lately.
connachta wrote: » Absolutely no contradiction Connacht main team is a middle table team, on a par with Ulster, other middle table team. And on a par with Munster or Leinster "A+" teams. That's good enough to qualify for European Cup. Back-row is probably one of the strongest position where Connacht matches other big clubs. Scrumhalf and Centre too. It doesn't mean the rest is the exact same.
Wegians89 wrote: » Connachts aim should be 2nd in the conference this season they’re good enough to do it. Munster are nothing special.
Dubinusa wrote: » The Leinster back row grew into the match last week. After 80 mins, Ruddock was the top dog. Rewatch the match, you'll see Leavy, Ruddock and Deegan take control. Connacht couldn't contain the pressure. On another note, if Coetzee was Irish qualified and healthy, Stander would be the back up imo.