kuro68k wrote: » The British government is going to take it right to the cliff edge and hope that someone else compromises. Of course they have their excuses already lined up if no-one does, only real question is who they will blame.
Scoondal wrote: » Ah boo hoo. The argument can't be won so you cry " TROLL ". I can debate according to facts. Have I said something here that is factually incorrect ? If you cannot engage in debate, get off the stage.
Enzokk wrote: » Scoondal wrote: » Ah boo hoo. The argument can't be won so you cry " TROLL ". I can debate according to facts. Have I said something here that is factually incorrect ? If you cannot engage in debate, get off the stage. Provide links to your statement that recent polls showed a majority want to leave as you asserted. If you don't or can't then you are trolling, factually speaking.
prawnsambo wrote: » So you didn't vote for 'no deal' then. Otherwise you'd have loads of links for me to read about how that was offered as an option during the referendum. Grand so.
Scoondal wrote: » No. I am an Irish Citizen. Plug in your brain.
UsedToWait wrote: » I hate to see this thread derailed for pages at a time by trolls / attention seekers. Just ignore them, and starve them of the oxygen they crave.
An Ciarraioch wrote: » Not all the 52% interpreted Leave as "trading on WTO terms", indeed, given the sizeable number of EFTA Brexiteers, along advocates of Turkey and Switzerland, "no dealers" are very much a minority.
Kalyke wrote: » What I dont get is this notion that the result of the referendum must be honoured above all else..the people spoke, etc. But the people may have changed their mind due to being better informed? No, we cant hear you now that you are better educated about the facts. "We know better." Democracy is sacrosanct when it suits the bully. Well, if what the people say is SO important then bloody HELL listen to them NOW! The changing of opinions is what got women the vote and rid of slavery, etc.
Beechwoodspark wrote: » Hello there. I see you have ignored my reply to you. Not very polite. Anyway. Provide a link for your assertions please? Thank you.
Scoondal wrote: » An Ciarraioch wrote: » Not all the 52% interpreted Leave as "trading on WTO terms", indeed, given the sizeable number of EFTA Brexiteers, along advocates of Turkey and Switzerland, "no dealers" are very much a minority. Provide sources.
‘I do not believe there should be any special terms for EU migrants,’ he wrote to Labour peer Lord Adonis. ‘Once we have left the EU there will be no legal basis to treat them differently from migrants from non-EU countries.’
Enzokk wrote: » https://twitter.com/aljwhite/status/1070747078576480257 Ok, so this is how Jacob Rees-Mogg does his business. I am not sure what the whole context of the clip is but JRM proclaims that the front bench and Theresa May made a "great mistake" by not guaranteeing the rights of EU citizens to stay in the UK right after the referendum. The link in the second tweet from the 6th September this year has JRM stating that EU nationals will have no extra rights over other nationals from other countries. This is from the link in the tweet.
Scoondal wrote: » Provide sources.
Nody wrote: » How about from the horses's mouth so to speak of what the Brexiteers claimed during the campaign (and hence what people voted for? You know the part that does not mention leaving the single market, that talks about joining Norway/Switzerland etc. during the debate. You know; minor things like actual facts rather than 1984 style revision of history.
Scoondal wrote: » I still think that it insulting to the UK electorate to tell them that they are wrong. It doesn't surprise me that they voted out because I have a low opinion of UK. But as per recent polls only 49% said "Britain" was wrong to leave EU. And there you have it. Still 49%. Do we really need idiots in EU ?
briany wrote: » A thought on Brexit - If you'd flipped the result of the referendum, would the 48 percent Leave vote have gotten on board with staying in the EU, or would they have continued to agitate? Would Nigel Farage have accepted it as a decisive mandate? Would Boris Johnson continued to run on a platform of Euro-scepticism, given the (ahem) overwhelming result? Would mr. or mrs. Question Time "17.4 million people!" have popped EU flags onto the wing mirrors of their car? Would any of them accepted a Remainer telling them, "Will of the people!"? The answer is, no, of course not. That's why it's hilarious when they accuse Remainers of trying to scupper the Brexit process.
Deleted User wrote: » Farage famously said before the referendum about a remain victory:'In a 52-48 referendum this would be unfinished business by a long way. If the Remain campaign win two-thirds to one-third that ends it."
Shelga wrote: » If they do leave, and there’s another global economic crash where the likes of Italy and Greece are disproportionately affected, would the UK be more protected, as they won’t have to shell out to bail them out? Or Ireland, for that matter. Were they always a bit more shielded from this anyway, by not being in the Eurozone? It seems like they have the best of everything at the moment and are absolutely mad to vote leave.
greenfield21 wrote: » I don't know what would happen after brexit but If a crash came now for the world economy would it not be good for brexit. The people are fed up as it is and world economy is said to have peaked. Imagine what a recession would do. Just look what's going on in France.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w4.vanillicon.com/v2/4c998303aa0fcfcedb419267ab426bd5.svg)
