nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Margaret Cash steals €300 worth of clothes from Penneys and aftermath/etc!

jjmcclure

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/homeless-mumofseven-margaret-cash-appears-in-court-over-stealing-300-worth-of-clothes-from-penneys-37434491.html

Where are RTE now?

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

KrustyUCC

I'm surprised no 8 hasn't/isn't on the way

'single' homeless mother of seven worries where she will live in time for her new arrival

ohnonotgmail

Deleted User wrote: »

I don’t think that it’s her argument. It’s council rules regarding overcrowded.

No her argument is that it wasn't where she wanted to live.

[Deleted User]

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

No her argument is that it wasn't where she wanted to live.

Wasn’t it said that she wanted somewhere near her mothers grave?

Homer

Church on Tuesday wrote: »

Sure look, it probably doesn't really matter at this stage.

Sort of.. Seven thieving little pairs of hands are better than 6 surely

Can carry more out of Penneys

ohnonotgmail

Deleted User wrote: »

Wasn’t it said that she wanted somewhere near her mothers grave?

Something like that.

ohnonotgmail

Homer wrote: »

Sort of.. Seven thieving little pairs of hands are better than 6 surely

Can carry more out of Penneys

i'm still trying to figure out how she managed to carry €300 worth of stuff from Penneys. She should get herself a job as a brickies labourer.

KrustyUCC

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

i'm still trying to figure out how she managed to carry €300 worth of stuff from Penneys. She should get herself a job as a brickies labourer.

Ha!!!

xi5yvm0owc1s2b

KrustyUCC wrote: »

I'm surprised no 8 hasn't/isn't on the way

The husband decided instead to work on #1 with another woman.

KrustyUCC

True but he did have a chance in the house when he was released and for all we know he might still be there in the background

xi5yvm0owc1s2b

KrustyUCC wrote: »

True but he did have a chance in the house when he was released and for all we know he might still be there in the background

Very true. It wouldn't surprise me at all if sometime next year we're hearing about the plight of Margaret Cash and her eight children.

Trigger Happy

As a good catholic girl I am sure she will be living a life of chastity and honoring her marriage vows.

If she does get up the duff then it will be an imaculate conception for which she will be wanting compo.

Church on Tuesday

gwalk wrote: »

We're talking about certain aspects of traveler culture here, not prison :rolleyes:

Church on Tuesday

Homer wrote: »

Sort of.. Seven thieving little pairs of hands are better than 6 surely

Can carry more out of Penneys

I really don't think we should be attacking the kids folks, not their fault their mother is dodge.

Roger Hassenforder

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Wasn’t it said that she wanted somewhere near her mothers grave?

Dig up the mother and move the lot to Roscommon

CinemaGuy45

Church on Tuesday wrote: »

I really don't think we should be attacking the kids folks, not their fault their mother is dodge.

Look let's be honest we know how the kids are going to turn out their mother and father are the only role models they are being exposed too.

I find posts like yours disingenuous.

Look at this another way do you think the Cash woman should be allowed to continue to ruin these children?

Church on Tuesday

CinemaGuy45 wrote: »

Look let's be honest we know how the kids are going to turn out their mother and father are the only role models they are being exposed too.

I find posts like yours disingenuous.

Look at this another way do you think the Cash woman should be allowed to continue to ruin these children?

Well in an ideal world they would be taken off her hands right away. She has already proved she's not fit to be a mother by failing to provide a roof over their head.

Of course that's not ever going to happen and yes, they will grow up to be much the same sadly.

They're kids. Young kids too. Have a bit of perspective.

CinemaGuy45

Church on Tuesday wrote: »

Well in an ideal world they would be taken of her hands right away. She has already proved she's not fit to be a mother by failing to provide a roof over her head.

Of course that's not ever going to happen and yes, they will grow up to be much the same sadly.

They're kids. Young kids too. Have a bit of perspective.

Thanks for the honest answer it is refreshing around here.:)

I did not pick on the kids I do agree that is a bit low.
As for the rest of the situation, it is depressing.

Church on Tuesday

CinemaGuy45 wrote: »

Thanks for the honest answer it is refreshing around here.:)

I did not pick on the kids I do agree that is a bit low.
As for the rest of the situation, it is depressing.

And thank you for your polite and constructive reply which can be quite rare here too by times.

It is depressing, frankly it's madness this nonsense is allowed to continue.

BBFAN

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

My parents had 7 kids in a two bed house with 2 daughters and 5 sons. You just make it work.

Very irresponsible of them to have 7 children when they only had a two bed house though wasn't it?

That's if you agree with the majority here?

Lefty Bicek

Roger Hassenforder wrote: »

Dig up the mother and move the lot to Roscommon

:eek::D

Church on Tuesday

BBFAN wrote: »

Very irresponsible of them to have 7 children when they only had a two bed house though wasn't it?

That's if you agree with the majority here?

If you can support them and bring them up in a half decent manner, as I'm sure this posters parents did, then it's actually pretty responsible.

Amirani

Church on Tuesday wrote: »

If you can support them and bring them up in a half decent manner, as I'm sure this posters parents did, then it's actually pretty responsible.

Having 7 kids in a developed world country is never responsible.

Odelay

BBFAN wrote: »

Very irresponsible of them to have 7 children when they only had a two bed house though wasn't it?

That's if you agree with the majority here?

A. It probably was a different time before contraception was freely available, and B. They probably got up off their arse and worked instead of having the hand out.

Church on Tuesday

Amirani wrote: »

Having 7 kids in a developed world country is never responsible.

Even if the parents are decent hard working people who can feed and clothe all seven?

givyjoe

Amirani wrote: »

Having 7 kids in a developed world country is never responsible.

Except you know very well the poster isn't 12 ffs and is referencing a completely different era, when Ireland was far from a developed country.

ohnonotgmail

BBFAN wrote: »

Very irresponsible of them to have 7 children when they only had a two bed house though wasn't it?

That's if you agree with the majority here?

This was nearly 50 years ago. Things were different. The generation before that would be lucky to have 2 bedrooms. My father was also not dependent on the state to feed and clothe us.

tuxy

Imagine the quality of life Cash could live in somewhere like Roscommon with that level of social welfare payouts. She really is doing her kids a disservice.

Fann Linn

tuxy wrote: »

Imagine the quality of life Cash could live in somewhere like Roscommon with that level of social welfare payouts. She really is doing here kids a disservice.

Time to 'build that wall' in Roscommon. Ye can keep her up there.

tuxy

Fann Linn wrote: »

Time to 'build that wall' in Roscommon. Ye can keep her up there.

IMO most counties are nicer to live in than Dublin. The only problem with these counties is lack of jobs but that's another bonus for Cash!

Mongfinder General

tuxy wrote: »

IMO most counties are nicer to live in than Dublin. The only problem with these counties is lack of jobs but that's another bonus for Cash!

Cash bonus. I see what you did there.