Wanderer78 wrote: » You could make it work in a one room bedsit if needs be, but do we really have to?
Rex Tasteless Gutter wrote: » I appreciate your point, but Cash would arguably have the European Social Charter on her side when it comes to the provision of adequate social housing. She could argue that a three-bedroom house isn't adequate for her family's needs, given that she has six boys and a girl. Either the six boys would all be crammed in one bedroom, or the girl would have to share a bedroom with two or three brothers -- which might be fine when they are little kids, but most people would consider that sort of living arrangement unsuitable for teenagers. If Cash decides to pursue the state through the courts for failing to provide adequate housing, the cost to the taxpayer would be much more than the upgrade from a 3-bed to a 4-bed.
Wanderer78 wrote: » I suspect her kids already exist, how much would be required to house all these kids, comfortably, what kind of income would be required to do so, and what are the chances of this occurring by cash herself?
Jasiah Hot Talker wrote: » That’s a valid point when considering what house you’re going to buy. It’s not a valid point when you’re going cap in hand to the taxpayers.
Jasiah Hot Talker wrote: Or she could take responsibility for her own crotch goblins and pay for them herself? Or are we past this too in this decade? Am I old fashioned?
Wanderer78 wrote: » Surely we ve moved on from these kind of situations, what decade was this?
ohnonotgmail wrote: ah we have moved on from this. this was in the early 70's. But there is no reason why they can't make it work in a 3 bed house if they really want to.
ohnonotgmail wrote: My parents had 7 kids in a two bed house with 2 daughters and 5 sons. You just make it work.
PlaneSpeeking wrote: » My dad had two sisters and a brother, all shared a room. No biggie.
Rex Tasteless Gutter wrote: » Her argument there was that six of her seven children are boys, and she couldn't put them all in the same room to give the girl a room of her own. Somewhat valid point, but does not excuse her attitude.
B00MSTICK wrote: » To follow on from this in a completely different (and less humorous) way Remember Martin Ward, the traveller that was on RTE's "The Cutting Edge"? He's gay and a LGBTQ+ activist and was given praise for appearing on the show with many saying he would be a great spokesman for Travellers etc. The thing is, Martin Warde is pretty much the needle in the Traveller haystack: 1. Education 57% of male and 54% of females travellers don't progress past primary school. ~8% go on to do the leaving cert. Martin is one of the ~1% that will get a 3rd level education. This is the single biggest issue IMO. 2. Employment ~80% of Traveller's are unemployed. Given the change in the times (being a tinker is no longer a viable career) and the rise of skilled jobs, this is clearly linked to education. I believe after finishing the leaving cert Martin traveled to the UK where he gained extensive bar-management experience. I imagine he came back to Ireland to study. I'm under no illusion he'd find it harder to get a job here because of his name and the discrimination it brings with it. 3. Nomadic (or not) The title of the Irish times piece is just this "I am a Traveller who does not travel" As mentioned above I doubt he lived in a caravan or travelled around much while he was working in England and am pretty sure he doesn't now that he is in NUIG. I also get the feeling his parents weren't quite so nomadic if he managed to complete the junior and leaving cert. 4. Family/Environment From what I can tell Martin has no family of his own as of yet, he isnt married either AFAIK. Almost a third of Irish travellers in the 15-29 age group are married compared to ~6% in the settled community. More than 1 in 4 Irish Traveller households had 6 or more persons. 5. Religion/Sexuality Not sure which (if any) religions Martin believes in but the majority of Travellers would be staunch Catholics. I can't imagine being gay in the travelling community is a barrel of laugh so fair play to Martin on that count and continuing to build acceptance. I'm hoping his parents are open/accepting of it too and he has a good relationship with them. 6. Horses/Animals (none?) While Martin was working in the UK or now that he is in college I doubt he had any equine pals around. 7. Other Unfortunately many travellers are involved in crime, yet he doesn't seem to have gone down that path. He doesn't drink much. He doesn't post call out videos. He doesn't even sound like the majority of travellers I've spoken with or heard speaking. If he had a different surname he probably wouldn't be discriminated against anymore than a settled person. Taking all this into account - he's doesn't really fit into the traveller stereotype at all. He is essentially a traveller that does not follow their typical traits or "traveller culture" If we had a few generations of Travellers like him would we see as much discrimination at all?
Tipperary animal lover wrote: » Haven't heard a few of them words in a long time, gave me a good laugh on a Sunday morning, one of the better traveller call out I've seen in awhile
gormdubhgorm wrote: » The other bit that annoys me she was offered a 3 bedroom house but refused it outright. It is like 'offering her nothing'. A grateful person would be delighted to have a roof over thier head. She claims with 9 people it is would not be big enough. I am not so sure.... 3/4 people in a room bunk-beds sleeping bags? She could make do.
tuxy wrote: » I think you may be correct, the travleers are very progressive over in the UK and can even be openly gay. Progress!