antodeco wrote: » FTP holders should be put into specific carriages and the rest of the "wealthy" are out into the other carriages. I think to speed things up as well, they should get the long FTP number tattooed on the inside of their arms. Free head shaves for all!
mad muffin wrote: » Personally I blame the liberals. All of today’s societies ills stem from them. All of it.
Cushie Butterfield wrote: » Look at it this way OP - you may have to stand for an hour on a packed train, but aren’t you the lucky one who can arrive to ‘work’ & post away to your hearts content for hours on end & the icing on the cake is you get paid for your trouble! It’s no wonder you’re exhausted 🤕
Garibaldi? wrote: » Many oaps use the pass to travel around the country. They shop, go to restaurants, have a few drinks because they're not driving and stay in hotels. A lot of this is made possible by the free transport. It's an incentive to get out there and spend a few quid. I'd say many local businesses around the country would agree with me.
PlaneSpeeking wrote: » That is a ridiculous post and was often thrown at workers on other threads. You know us workers - we're not like battery hens, we occasionally have breaks; trips to the bathroom; lunchtimes; downtime between tasks etc.
Hector Savage wrote: » Jesus thats rough ..
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » The ftp holders and the wealthy might well be the same people of course, statistically they probably are. What do you do then?
antodeco wrote: » Do you have those stats to hand as I'm assuming it's equal across all as anyone is entitled to a FTP once they reach 65.
PlaneSpeeking wrote: » Sssh you'll make the rest of them drop their pitchforks! Just to make it clear - again: Sick, elderly, hospital visits etc - all travel Any other FTP holder - off peak only (after 9am out and not before 6pm back). Who could have an issue with that ??
Deleted User wrote: » The Uk system limits free travel to your local area only. I agree with the OP that it should be limited to off peak only.
PlaneSpeeking wrote: » Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » There’s a lot of ganging up on the op here. In fact the free pass is a bit odd isn’t it, it’s not means tested and in fact old people are means tested for a lot of stuff. For anybody sick though there should be no restriction. Otherwise free pass off peak could well work. And be available up to a limit, say the median income. Sssh you'll make the rest of them drop their pitchforks! Just to make it clear - again: Sick, elderly, hospital visits etc - all travel Any other FTP holder - off peak only (after 9am out and not before 6pm back). Who could have an issue with that ??
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » There’s a lot of ganging up on the op here. In fact the free pass is a bit odd isn’t it, it’s not means tested and in fact old people are means tested for a lot of stuff. For anybody sick though there should be no restriction. Otherwise free pass off peak could well work. And be available up to a limit, say the median income.
mariaalice wrote: » It is from the age of 60 in the UK, no harm in it being off-peak only but truly the op resenting a few healthy mature women or other stragglers who would not be using public transport every day they might only be using it a few times a year it's ludicrous. I also find it fascinating this focusing ire and resentment on to almost harmless individual and groups, what next resentment against the cattle in the fields eating grass when there could be a house for a family in the field.When and if I get my bus pass I won't be using it at peak times as like the vast majority I will be having a lie on after a lifetime of working.
Emme wrote: » Another point I have is that workers are too exhausted to vote or protest.
Garibaldi? wrote: » Once something is granted to a particular sector, complicated restrictions and consequent petty nit-picking render it both unsavoury and unmanageable. The free travel pass brings many advantanges. Given the high rates of tax, USC, property tax etc with which we are shackled it is comforting to think that we would be provided for should we fall on hard times. And commuting is a hugely significant consideration in most people's lives.
pjohnson wrote: » I think OP should look into getting a taxi. Public transport doesn't suit people who dont seem to like the public.
mariaalice wrote: » Multimedia is a solution along with noise-canceling headphones, phone or notebook or kindle in hand, and earphones on they won't have to listen or engage or focus on their fellow passengers in any way. Take a positive view of the commute it's a full hour or more of uninterrupted time to read or listen to a podcast, or some music.
skooterblue2 wrote: » Nonsense Tarquin, Bring the Bentley around the front, cant be seen in public Transport, What would Gussy and Winston and the boys at the Reform club think? Have some common sense man. Only a public education can bring about that type of thinking!
PlaneSpeeking wrote: » I'm not sure why you're running with the antisocial nonsense but I have no issue with fellow travellers; we're largely in the same boat. I have an issue with being in the 12th hour of a working day and having to lean onto a jacks door for "comfort" while someone who wouldn't have put in 12 hours in the last year combined swans on to the train with their free pass and feral kids. Oh and lose the Belsen type rhetotic guys, it doesn't make you sound edgy - just offensive.
mariaalice wrote: » Can find the piece now: When third-class carriages were abolished in the Uk some Buffone either a Lord Bumbly Fumbly type or an MP commented how will the typist get to work as they could not possibly be in the same cartridge as their employers.
Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: » What’s that anecdote gotta do with a worker who travels more than two hours a day? The op is the pleb here. The rich older generation are the upper classes.