kuro68k wrote: » The British government is going to take it right to the cliff edge and hope that someone else compromises. Of course they have their excuses already lined up if no-one does, only real question is who they will blame.
brickster69 wrote: » Rubbish, where do you stop a democratic vote? A country votes for a party in an election to serve 4 years and then two years through the term the public can request to vote again because their views have changed ? Brexit has now become much more than the UK leaving the EU now. It is the people instructing the politicians to carry out their democratic wishes. It is fundamental to democracy. Regardless of views, i would be pretty sure that the way this Government has handled this matter has broken whatever trust people had in politicians for a long long time. Quite shameful to be honest.
J Mysterio wrote: » Metro headline: 'RAAB: I DIDN'T THINK IT DOVER'. Oh dear. A bad day for Raab and the government.
theguzman wrote: » A second vote would be anti-democratic, the British people voted for Brexit and that is exactly what they should get, a hard Brexit, it is obvious they want out and if faced with such an arrogant move of trying to get them to change their minds I could see the pendulum swinging further right and an even stronger vote for Brexit second time around. The liberals really can't accept they lost in this instance.
Nate--IRL-- wrote: » This is an interesting development. The EU27 ambassadors are demanding to scrutinise any deal reached with the UK, before they will sign off on any Leaders summit. Up until now Barnier has had a free hand within the remit he was given. It looks like offering the whole of the UK a customs union might have been a bridge too far for the EU member states.https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/nov/09/new-blow-to-may-as-eu-leaders-demand-scrutiny-of-brexit-deal Nate
bob mcbob wrote: » From the guardian - apparently he is now known as Raab C Brexit in his own department
backspin. wrote: » I wish the UK never voted for Brexit. But i would worry that if they changed course now and decided to stay under the strain of realizing the possible consequences. What would that say to all other countries in the EU. That they can never really leave the EU. It would embolden the EU so that any individual country that was not going along with the majority on any matter would be dismissed without a care in the world. What would it say to the likes of Hungary or Poland or Italy with their views on immigration. They would be told toe the line or else. Because we know you will never leave.
An Ciarraioch wrote: » And now the independent review mechanism for the temporary customs union has been rejected:https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/mays-brexit-deal-suffers-major-setback-after-eu-rejects-uk-arbitration-mechanism_uk_5be60739e4b0e8438897d972#comments
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » A country hasn't been this humiliated since at least the Irish or Greek bailouts.
Sand wrote: » A major requirement of the UK government has been to portray Brexit as a negotiation between equals. Its not a negotiation. They're not equals. Concepts such as 'independent' reviews help the UK save face, but the EU has no need to permit third parties to influence EU interests. In as much as the UK ruling class misread the Brexit revolt, they have continued to misread their status and the weight of their interests against those of the EU. Either the UK accepts vassalage, or they get no-deal chaos until they do accept vassalage.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » The UK is being humiliated. There is no other word for it. .
charlie14 wrote: » I would not see where, seeing as the EU accepted NI as being a part of the UK application to join, would legally leave us or the EU with a leg to stand on on the border issue when it came to the UK deciding to leave other than under the GFA. The GFA is the key as to why we and the EU can insist on no hard border. My point is that from the points I have already made that there is a possible double edged sword to the GFA in relation the border.
cml387 wrote: » Triggering A50 was ... the logical thing to do after the leave vote (or what? prolong the agony indefinitely?)
Enzokk wrote: » But why would the EU agree to that? Will they get a different result if they delay by a year? Unless there is a way for the UK to get past the arithmetic in the House of Commons I see no reason to continue with the inevitable.
cml387 wrote: » Invoking A50 was logical, as I said, given the result of the referendum. That the referendum result defied logic is the insanity that sparked he whole thing. Setting up a talking shop,regardless of who was involved, would still leave us at exactly the same impasse as we are in now, except that at least now the drop dead date of march 2019 has concentrated minds. Incidentally my reference to Labour's deal with the UUP (change the letters, the mindset was exactly the same) led to Roy Mason's tenure as NI secretary and the catastrophic "security forces first" regime he instigated.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » The UK is being humiliated. There is no other word for it.
cml387 wrote: » at least now the drop dead date of march 2019 has concentrated minds.
Sand wrote: » The Guardian is hopelessly biased, little better than Breitbart. Raab is a fool, but I wouldn't particularly trust anything the Guardian reports on the matter.