Uncharted wrote: » Im sure the one thing we all can agree on,despite our differing opinions on the case,is that Ken Kratz is a real grade A piece of sh The guy is almost a caricature of slyness. He's a sleazy slimeball personified.
enfant terrible wrote: » What can we call agree about Averys character? Who between Avery and Kratz is a more deplorable character?
Uncharted wrote: » In my opinion,Stephen Avery is a nasty piece of work. I don't like his personality much,I certainly would not be a cheerleader for him. That doesn't change the fact* that he was framed for Teresa Halbach's murder by the way. To be honest,its hard to say which one is worse. A privileged background and an expensive education is perhaps a more socially acceptable mask than being a barely literate grease monkey redneck. I believe they are both unpleasant in their own ways. *imo
Commanchie wrote: » Why are you assuming we all think SA is a nice guy and has no part to play in this crime. I think we all know SA isnt a nice guy from his behaviours as a youth. I also believe he knows something( I dont believe he committed murder) but knows who did. Just cause he is not a nice guy doesnt warrant being set up for a murder. The evidence is so blatantly fixed up that its laughable. The evidence and process has been tampered with of that I have no doubt.
Field east wrote: » It does not make sence that he knows who did it or even have very strong suspicions and did not share it with his defense team the first time around. That would have provided a major platform for his defense team in the first team to build on
Brock Turnpike wrote: » Imagine the conversation when Walshb and Enfant Terrible arrive into their respective work places this morning. People asking how the bank holiday weekend went, and the two of them having to lie about the fact that they spent the whole bank holiday Monday trying to wind people up on the internet.
Commanchie wrote: » I also believe he knows something( I dont believe he committed murder) but knows who did.
walshb wrote: » This is absolute fantasy stuff now....no matter what side you are on as regards believing him innocent or guilty.
walshb wrote: » And those we wound up?
Uncharted wrote: » Have you watched any of series 2 yet? If so,has it changed your opinion at all?
walshb wrote: » Started it last night.....on episode 1....
enfant terrible wrote: » Yes we just had a guy post he thinks Avery is not a bad guy and doesn't get called out by Avery fans. But I'm a wind up merchant 😀 In fairness we've all chased down a cat, poured petrol over it and thrown it onto a fire, then laughed as it died. I'll post back later if I've time of all the other horrible stuff Avery has done in case some of you are as deluded as that guy.
Zero-Cool wrote: » Just finished season 2, straight on here to get people's thoughts on it...
Commanchie wrote: » Whats your thought on it? Guilty? Not Guilty?
pixelburp wrote: » mod: simple warning. Stop winding each other up. No name-calling. Play nice from here on in or cards will start coming out. If you haven't watched the show, then I'd question why contribute to the thread at all, except as a WUM. Leaving it there, but keeping an eye.
Zero-Cool wrote: » Not guilty. I thought the same after the first season but then gradually started to feel that maybe the lads did it and left it at that. Kathleen found so much stuff that was really interesting. For me, it's not even a guilty/not guilty thing yet, it's more 'get those lads a fecking retrial!'. I've never felt like trolling someone on Twitter but that Krantz is definitely tempting me. What a c*** of a man.
Tipsy McSwagger wrote: » Are you talking about both seasons or can you not contribute to the thread if you’ve only seen season 1?
