Mountainsandh wrote: » Exactly the points people have been making here.
Mountainsandh wrote: » So you base your judgment on the same as us, the internet and the media really.
walshb wrote: » Hardly insulting. I am just amazed how gullible and naive and taken in so many people are with this clearly agenda driven biased show...Btw, anyone have any idea who did murder the woman, if it wasn’t Avery? Cops, are they out searching for the real killer(s)?
walshb wrote: » Google it... Plenty there to tell the actual facts/details... Doesn’t rely on desperation and red herrings..
Potential Underachiever wrote: » Walshb, you have your own opinion, that's cool, no need to be insulting the intelligence of anyone that doesn't agree with it.
Mountainsandh wrote: » Could you provide a link to "the other side" please ?
walshb wrote: » Guilty as sin...tonnes of evidence... And the defenses red herrings doesn’t change that In a nutshell the programme and defense want people to believe that all this evidence is tainted and planted. All of it. Utter bull... Go read up on the other side. The overwhelming evidence that tells us that Avery is the killer.. Then blame all this overwhelming evidence on a corrupt prosecution... Ludicrous..
walshb wrote: » I’m amazed at the amount of so called educated people who fell for this red herring littered programme... Avery is a killer. More bloody evidence than they had for OJ, yet so many people are being hoodwinked by a desperate and illogical defense...
Akrasia wrote: » After watching both series. What evidence is there to actually link Stephen to the crime that isn't seriously tainted?
Jane98 wrote: » I've watched both seasons. After the first I was pretty convinced they were both innocent but I had a tiny doubt. After the second I am fully convinced of their innocence. I'm wondering will there be any media backlash in the coming weeks, also I wonder will any of the original jurors come out publicly and give their opinion, ie whether they would still convict or perhaps change their mind in light of the new evidence.
Commanchie wrote: » Youve only heard of a HC in this?
McGrath5 wrote: » Habeas corpus.
bazermc wrote: » I’ve learnt loads of new words and phrases in the Season 2 that I plan to use in everyday work, even though I’m an accountant; Brady Violation Denny suspect En Banc Review Hustle shoot. Berm Anybody got others I missed?
FAILSAFE 00 wrote: » I think it was possibly Brendan and his brother Bobby.
jester77 wrote: » The American legal system is a joke. The fact that you cannot challenge their innocence and have to challenge that the legal system is wrong is utterly ridiculous. Not sure what to make of season 2. Some of the stories Kathleen came up with are very far fetched and don't help her case. Plus I don't like the way she throws out accusations so readily. Some of those judges were more worried about defending the system than looking into whether Brendan was coerced, sad and worrying at the same time. I feel so sorry for the poor lad, had his bags packed a few times ready to leave. Must be soul destroying for him. Does he have any options left now? They finished off the season too abruptly for my liking. They didn't talk to the defense team again after the supreme court ruling. Still not sure about Avery, there would have to be a lot of collusion going on if Kathleen's stories are to be believed. The cops, the ex-boyfriend, prosecutors, the step dad and other brother would have to be all involved in the setup for it to make sense. Too much for me. The one person that seems dodgiest to me is the cop. Definitely some dirty cop stuff went down in this case.
