Conservative wrote: » There has been a clear shift in his direction since then if you'd paid any attention whatsoever.
Zubeneschamali wrote: » Conservative wrote: » There has been a clear shift in his direction since then if you'd paid any attention whatsoever. Based on what? There hasn't been a poll since Casey's bigotry came out.
tonycascarino wrote: » But how does one really know the national average? I mean these Red C Polls for example are a load of codswallop. They are tools used to influence the public to vote a certain way. In Britain there was no hope of Brexit winning if we were to rely on their polls, there was also no hope of Trump winning according to their polls. Now, I do not think Casey is going to win by any means but I would be willing to bet that he is far more than 2% that the national polls are trying to lead one to think.
DavidLyons_ wrote: » No. Read it again. I said "a number of posters and their fellow cretins..." have a deluded view. Same old misinterpreting of the point. To reiterate, very, very few voters believe the role of the president is anything other than ceremonial. The people voting for Peter Casey are not racist or stupid. The reasons for those of us giving him our No. 1 have been well documented here. Choose to ignore that all you wish. It'll be some laugh to see the reaction when Casey polls well on Friday. VOTE PETER CASEY NO. 1.
Zubeneschamali wrote: » Based on what? There hasn't been a poll since Casey's bigotry came out.
Johnny Dogs wrote: » Thing is, this has been asked repeatedly, and no one has come within a fanny hair of being able to, but once again, and for the record, what did Casey say or do that even remotely approach "bigotry can you please give an example"?
Zubeneschamali wrote: » Fanning anti-traveller sentiment to whip up votes.
PlaneSpeeking wrote: » Away with your common sense! We'll have no common sense here!!!!! :D:D Casey's getting my #1 vote on Friday.
omega man wrote: » You’re missing the point. People are supporting him as finally a someone has spoken out. This is now an opportunity for people to have a voice where they didn’t before. Leo talked the talk on backing those who got up early but he hasn’t walked the walk. Maybe if Casey received a sizeable percentage then he’ll take note or other TDs will. I’m hopeful for the first time in quite a while.
PressRun wrote: » You all keep saying stuff like this, but what exactly is Peter Casey going to do for "people who get up early"? What exactly is there to be hopeful about? Peter Casey isn't going to do anything for you or anyone like you. He's a mouthpiece and nothing more.
MrMusician18 wrote: » By saying they were equal to every other Irish citizen?
Atlantis50 wrote: » A traveller woman overheard a man use the word 'knacker'. Naturally, Peter Casey is to blame. Naturally, it deserves a story of its own. :rolleyes:https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/verbal-abuse-victim-blames-peter-casey-for-emboldening-racists-878610.html
JeffKenna wrote: » And what do you propose we do....keep the same status quo?
PressRun wrote: » You all keep saying stuff like this and you keep saying you understand what the president does, but then say that he would give you a voice? What exactly is Peter Casey going to do for "people who get up early"? What exactly is there to be hopeful about? Peter Casey isn't going to do anything for you or anyone like you. He's a mouthpiece and nothing more. The president's role is ceremonial. They basically just have to behave in a dignified way in public, which I'm not sure Casey is even capable of doing.
Conservative wrote: » Have you been living under a rock? The poll is completely outdated and from before Casey made any headlines at all. There has been a clear shift in his direction since then if you'd paid any attention whatsoever.
LiamoSail wrote: » There seems to be a real fear among the political classes that the middle class now have a candidate through whom they can channel their anger. People are tired of working hard to fund the lifestyles of those that don't. People are tired of being unable to afford to live close to their employment in the city while their taxes are used to provide homes for those who won't work, in the city. People are tired of hearing about the likes of Margret Cash taking home €50k/yr in benefits while the average person struggles on an industrial wage of approx €35k/yr, before paying their tax. Enough is enough. Casey won't change anything, but a vote for him will send a strong message. This is not an alt right movement, nor is it merely the uneducated. It's people who work for a living sick to the back teeth of funding those that won't. Not the oaps, not those on disability. Those who choose not to work and expect us to foot the bill.
MrMusician18 wrote: » The idea is that a vote for Casey will be recognized by the political establishment that there is deep unhappiness in a portion of the electorate. Politicians being politicians will move position to capture this vote and hopefully address these issues. Casey is the embodiment of the unhappiness and is the only way for the electorate to express it, as seemingly politicians are not listening to these concerns. Furthermore the airing of these concerns are being suppressed by the media.
PressRun wrote: » Not going to happen.
PressRun wrote: » If you want to enact meaningful change, vote in a general election. Voting for a president who doesn't do anything isn't going to do any of the things you seem to want done.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Didn't we hear all this same stuff from Renua? We know how that turned out.
MrMusician18 wrote: » Renua was too tied up in abortion (being the reason for their birth and all) and were found to be way out of touch on it. There may be a market for a party of the right not mired in abortion baggage. We shall see.
Atlantis50 wrote: » Naturally, Peter Casey is to blame.