Beechwoodspark wrote: » https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-politics-45928722 PSNI set the record straight and deny Higgins story that they were involved in giving security advice to use the jet to Belfast.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Why wouldn't people who identify as Irish be given a vote here? Did you not agree with the GFA? Do you agree with partition?
Deleted User wrote: » Nothing to do with GFA- everything to do with contributing to this economy. I'm anti-vote for people not resident in Republic of Ireland. Why should I be subject to the opinions of people not living in and contributing to this country? If you want to vote, come back and live here. Simple.
FrancieBrady wrote: » So you would have to be employed and paying taxes to have a vote? Why not go all out like they did in the north and only allow property owners to vote? I think we could allow people to vote in Presidential elections without any great impact or import.
Gannicus wrote: » Always remember
NIMAN wrote: » Was that the one about planning objection from 1968 or something? If so, I remember thinking "well that is easily proved or disproved"....how come no media folk followed up on that the next day? Heard nothing about it since. Has it been proven to be wrong (or a lie?). Maybe PC was given wrong information by an advisor and was simply repeating what he was told? I'm sure he doesn't do all his own research.
Deleted User wrote: » I'm not going into the specifics this evening in terms of terms of conditions. What i don't like is people living outside of the state permanently having a say on Irish affairs. BTW unemployed people living in Ireland can contribute much more to Irish Society than those employed- so no, I wasn't nor did i ever suggest that, so less of the 2+2=6 please.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Well maybe don't phrase your 'condition' as 'contributing to the economy'. Okie doke?
Deleted User wrote: » you're the one who interpreted what i said - hokey dokie franckie baby?
FrancieBrady wrote: » There are thousands who navigate the country following their county and club teams, they contribute to our 'economy' if they asked for a vote, why wouldn't you let them? See how quickly your 'condition' comes unstuck.
Wheeliebin30 wrote: » I’ve seen some clutching at straws through the years but....
FrancieBrady wrote: » They 'contribute to the economy' though. What is clutching about that?
Deleted User wrote: » STOP MISQUOTING MY POSTS FOR YOUR OWN END
FrancieBrady wrote: » *
Deleted User wrote: » Ive reported your post. It's in the hands of the AH mods now. thanks.
pumpkin4life wrote: »
Kamden Fit Worker wrote: » 854 votes here so far, and still 55% support for Casey, interesting.
Phoebas wrote: » Meanwhile over in the professional opinion polls he's in last place at 2pct. I think we all know which poll will be closer to the mark.
eeepaulo wrote: » For some reason the media keep running that headline as news, but if you look at the small print its data up until the 16th.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Ive reported your post. It's in the hands of the AH mods now. thanks.
FrancieBrady wrote: » dates on which it was conducted and says very clearly that it was before Casey's generalised remarks.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/c33618a99b1d02afaf5370e8c02bf147.svg)
