Pete_Cavan wrote: » Worth keeping in mind that there is an international window between the next two PL games. Aguero hopefully won't be involved for the Argies friendlies (no doubt he will pull out due to injury if he is called up) whereas Kane will get significant minutes for England.
The real mccoy 91 wrote: » I played it in gw4 have 4 green arrows since going from 980k to 150k only kept taa as pool cover taking sterling haz and aguero instead
Iused2likebusts wrote: » Did u get a boost from it when you played it because pretty much everyone that has played it so far has hit the jackpot with it. Loads of CS for players brought in , hazard hat trick etc. The only week it may not have worked was gw 4 i think when people would have went big on mkhi and auba.
Ace2007 wrote: » Not really, I've been in freefall for last 5 GW's. My team isn't in bad shape as such, but my main rival has Kane (auto captained every week), Aguero and Firmino up top. He also have Ederson, TAA, Alonso and Tripper - but has no midfield. My team is Allison, Fab Robertson, Alonso, Tripper, AWB, Pereira Hazard, Mane, Moura, Fraser, Billing Aguero, Iheanacho, Success So my issues are - need to get rid of a premium defender, Moura, and would like to get Kane
km79 wrote: » http://twitter.com/BenDinnery/status/1046508716898619395
S.M.B. wrote: » This is the news I've been looking for. Will hold on and stay clear of kane for now. If things don't go to plan I'll sell Salah to fund kane.
km79 wrote: » Same Thinking of banking again now
FHFC wrote: » Not sure i get yous lads? Avoiding Kane because Pep confirms Aguero not fully fit ahead of facing Liverpool away. Surely if thinking of an Aguero Kane switch that would add to the argument. Of my 'big 4' (Sterling, Kane, Hazard, and Aguero) Aguero is starting to look the most disposable when I need Salah back.
Iused2likebusts wrote: » Thats the way its gone for most. Puts serious pressure on the likes of me that hasnt played it yet and have got off to on average start 410k.
claw wrote: » Already taken a -4 to get rid of Aguero and Shaw for Kane and Zabaleta. I know Shaw might keep a clean sheet next weekend but United are a mess so anything might happen there. Aguero who has never scored at Anfield versus Kane at home to Cardiff (regardless of who Spurs are playing in Europe) is a no brainer. At worst I will make some money on it and Aguero can go back in the following week. No other issues with my team.
COH wrote: » I think I'm going to hang on to Kun and Salah... was tempted to move them to Sterling/Kane but I'd only want them back again the following gameweek. Have 2FT and think Mendy to either Doherty/Holebas and Ings to Arnie is the way to go
S.M.B. wrote: » Do you need Aguero to drop by . 2 and Kane to rise by .2 to make money. And you need Kane to outscore Aguero by at least a goal to make any points gain?
Deleted User wrote: » If I’d the money in the bank i would swap Aguero and Kane for the week. Would have done it last week. But I don’t so would need to raise funds. It’s just not worth it. When I do downgrade one of my premium defenders it’ll be for Doherty or Holebas.
Chesty08 wrote: » The way I see it, I think you needed to take the punt on Kane before the start of the last GW. My rationale was that Kane would outscore Salah over point games so was worth the punt. I wouldn't go chasing the Kane at home to Cardiff now as you are looking to recoup your hit on 1 GW which is a lot more riskier. Salah will be coming back in for me and I think it will be Kane making way, could be Aguero or Hazard either but immediate term thinking is Kane. I will bank this week and this will enable 2 FT's for the international break.
claw wrote: » I try and play the game the way I see it. If Aguero hasn't scored at Anfield before in 9 matches (1 for Atletico) and isn't fully fit, then I would rather take a -4 and risk it. I am a Liverpool supporter. He has never done it at Anfield. Kane is at home to Cardiff. I would much prefer having Kane and worrying about not having Aguero at Anfield than vice versa.
claw wrote: » At some point I can see Shaw going down .1 and Zabaleta up .1 so I did that as an enabler for Kane. The money situation is a secondary concern to be honest.
S.M.B. wrote: » That's fair enough and it's hard to disagree but I still wouldn't call a second transfer costing 4 points for what may be a single week to be a "no brainer". Also fair enough, making decision based solely on team finances is not recommended. However I'm worried that making a statement like "At worst I will make some money" would tempt others to make a similar move as this would not be the case for most people. Maybe you bought Shaw in at 5.1 and Aguero at 11.4 though.
MurDawg wrote: Have to replace Eriksen and have 10.3 to spend on a replacement... Son or Alli seem logical
claw wrote: » I wasn't offering advice to anyone - I just said I had done my two transfers. I don't normally offer advice to anyone on this because not everyone plays this game the same way. I think team finances are very important and knowing when to take a hit on the right week to protect your team value is a key skill in the game. Playing this for 10 years and have done alright for the most part so I am not a newbie. Regarding my two transfers, time will tell whether they prove to be the right decision or not. I am not going to criticise people who stick with Aguero or put Kane in. For what its worth, I bought Shaw for 5.1 and Aguero 11.0, so unless I am wrong if Shaw goes down 0.1, Aguero goes down 0.1 and Kane goes up again (bought him for 12.4) I have protected my team value.
S.M.B. wrote: » Apologies, I misinterprted your original post as increasing "team value" as opposed to protecting (and if things go really well increasing) "real value". Makes a lot more sense now.