Axamentia wrote: » Also in the same boat we have all EPH set in the house, so just buying the email gateway will get me improved functionality. Might pair with the Home assistant, but really interested in finding a way to make API calls so we can regulate nursery temp.
matrim wrote: » I installed a smart TRV in my kitchen but it just changes the output that the TRV is set too and doesn't talk back to fire the boiler if it goes below a set temperature. I've both Ember and the TRV hooked up to home assistant for some monitoring / control from there. I mostly use that to set the EPH to different temperatures at different times of the day. But plan to look at using it to change modes too.
Standard Toaster wrote: » Negitive, you need the *-RF series to work with the gateway. Your one with gateway compatibility :https://www.ephcontrols.com/section/3-zone-programmer/ They look the same.
sightband wrote: » Thanks
Standard Toaster wrote: » I'm in the same boat. Looking to diy replace my R47....vs upgrade to an RF model. Maybe also include smart trvs. Haven't researched enough yet to make a decision.
s8n wrote: » I'm having a new system installed and eager to know if users on here recommend this or nest
KingCong wrote: » I have EPH and wouldn't recommend it, see my post on this thread for some reasons why: https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2057912428
Pique wrote: » Totally agree with 3 of your points. Different temps across the different times of the day, smart TRVs and reporting. The IFTTT or Google home / Alexa support doesn't concern me too much but lots of people have them (I don't). The thing is, if they opened their API and made some small changes then 2 of the first 3 above (duff temps and reporting) could easily be added. Hell a coder user could do it easy enough with their cooperation. Maybe they would be open to considering this approach.
matrim wrote: » Pique wrote: » Totally agree with 3 of your points. Different temps across the different times of the day, smart TRVs and reporting. The IFTTT or Google home / Alexa support doesn't concern me too much but lots of people have them (I don't). The thing is, if they opened their API and made some small changes then 2 of the first 3 above (duff temps and reporting) could easily be added. Hell a coder user could do it easy enough with their cooperation. Maybe they would be open to considering this approach. If you have home assistant you can get some of them already.
Pique wrote: » Explain? I have it but would love variable temps and reporting. Smart TRVs are on the list too when a decent brand is reasonably priced (which I haven't seen yet).
matrim wrote: » I traced their API and wrote a python library that can interact with it. I've added it to home assistant so that you can use that platform to monitor and manage the system. You can also hook home-assistant up to google home / alexa / IFTTT to get some control from those too.https://www.home-assistant.io/components/climate.ephember/ This shows my heating for today If you wanted to avoid home assistant you could use the python library directly to write a small program that changed temps based on a cron job.
john_doe. wrote: » Did you ever think about contacting them? I'm going to get it installed soon as I've considered all the other options and going with EPH from a support/installer point view . The Geofence I think is overkill - I don't need it. What you have there overcomes the limitations of Ember for me. Maybe they should hire you for some contract work :-)
matrim wrote: » I sent them a couple of questions about echo system stuff (e.g. TRVs) but didn't mention the library, mainly in case they decide to get upset and change it. For TRVs they pretty much said it won't happen. I'd be surprised if they every got much more in their current system. It seems like they just got what is supported in hardware and made it software. Their hardware doesn't support multiple temps so it would have to be controlled by their external software so would only be for the limited number of customers with the gateway. Plus, looking their code, it seems like some of the stuff is coming from an italian company, who outsource to a chinese company and the API is a bit of a mess. I wouldn't be hopeful of them taking adding many advanced features. So, if you are happy with a basic system then go for it. But if you actually want more advanced features, then i'd say take a bit of time to get a better system.
john_doe. wrote: » Thanks are you sticking with the EPH? I could take in back Into Home assistant , I was setting up an oilpal today to monitor oil usage and was looking to see can that also be pulled into Home assistant. I'm not pushed on advanced features , I think a lot of them are gimmicky enough and not convinced technology is quite strong enough yet. Something with easy control via phone I think will do me for now.