twin_beacon wrote: » Most tumosans wouldn't have had hard lives, they would be mainly used for regular stockman work, such as topping, moving bales, turning hay and spreading fertilisers. That being said, if i had 20k i wouldn't buy one, as it will deprecate a lot more. If look at massey, Deere or new Holland, as they hold their value
Loves_lorries wrote: » Think the hattat are nicer but they don't seem to have sold well at all even compared to the tumosan. Lot less dealers
Say my name wrote: » I'm throwing ArmaTrac into this discussion of Turkish tractors. Seemingly designed in house by their own engineers whereas the other crowd build their tractors under license from the super powers. They are the tractor division of the Erkunt Group.
Loves_lorries wrote: » Know absolutely nothing about them, what are they based on?
Say my name wrote: » Themselves seemingly. Independent to do what they like a bit like Kubota. That said they were taken over by Indian Mahindra & Mahindra last year.
Loves_lorries wrote: » OK so ArmaTrac use all their own parts? Are they around tumosan money new?
Say my name wrote: » To both questions I've no idea. If there's someone at the ploughing maybe they can price them up. Row 17 Stand 357 according to the Journal.
Loves_lorries wrote: » If a tumosan has already lost half its value within the first four years, would the bulk of the depreciation be out of the way? Also, would a four year old tractor (even a tumosan) have advantages over a twenty year old jd or new Holland etc cause most big brands are still making 20 k even for 1998 from what I see
Joe Daly wrote: » Would it last twenty years I wouldn't think so, I had a Zetor out for a couple of days from a local garage we cut down silage with it . It worked well but when I looked at the pros cons of it I decided no I had a new Holland with high hours I need to change it. These type of tractors are grand when you buy but like the old zetor crystels, the old hino lorries they were gone after ten years they were worked out.
emaherx wrote: » Know of plenty of old Zetors that were worked for over 30 years.
Joe Daly wrote: » Just speaking for myself you wouldn't see any old zetors working down here.
Loves_lorries wrote: » Thirty year old zetors are not much cheaper than Ford or mf from that era from what I can see and forty year old crystals are arguably worth more than say a massey 188 from late seventies.
Joe Daly wrote: » You are talking about a classic era there, if you know where a zetor crystal is for sale a relation of mine is looking for one to restore down the south east they are all gone, They were worked hard put up big hours used abused.
Loves_lorries wrote: » I'm just going by donedeal, know a guy who restored a crystal three years ago, got 7 k for it.
Joe Daly wrote: » Did he put much into it, this person I am talking about collects tractors that were on the farm from the grey ferguson they had a crystal but couldn't get one anywhere they were all scraped they were never traded in lads kept them going until they collapsed.
kevthegaff wrote: » If you restored fiats you'd make more, a clean one is making good money
charolais0153 wrote: » Tumosan are meant to be a noisy and bumpy tractor.
greenfield21 wrote: » Who else would question those hours?
20silkcut wrote: » Zetor crystals worked a lot longer than ten years they were still the staple of many contractors in the 90’s and early 00’s which was 25/30 years after its launch.