PARlance wrote: » Can't see it being anyone but Solan at this stage.
TCDStudent1 wrote: » Wonder what would happen if he ruled himself out....... Maurice Sheridan?
Audioslaven wrote: » What's he like?. I see him around Galway but not sure what sort of manager he would make at senior level. He is involved in the college?
ureds wrote: » Carnacon won their appeal tonight
Coillte_Bhoy wrote: » PressRun wrote: » I see the county board have declared that they're "putting a process in place" to select a new manager. So what happened to that August 31st deadline and all the pressure they put on Rochford to get things sorted quickly? Suddenly it doesn't seem so urgent any more. They're a f*cking joke. Criticise them for many things but for this?? Come on, obviously the process is going to take time.
PressRun wrote: » I see the county board have declared that they're "putting a process in place" to select a new manager. So what happened to that August 31st deadline and all the pressure they put on Rochford to get things sorted quickly? Suddenly it doesn't seem so urgent any more. They're a f*cking joke.
jj72 wrote: » If they just waited around for him to come up with a team until December say, and they didn't like it...what happens then, get left with no manager with the league right around the corner. It makes sense what they've done in that regard. It's one of the only things you cant criticise them for
Audioslaven wrote: » It is a high profile job so I am surprised someone from outside has not come forward.
jr86 wrote: » I certainly wouldn't write off someone 'left-field' coming into contention myself, and I personally don't think its as straightforward as Solan getting it by default I see one of the rags are even linking Jack O'Connor to it There's a lot of focus on the negative aspects of the job, but its still a team who have been in contention for the All Ireland for the last 6/7 years until this year (and who may just benefit from this break), there's a once in a generation talent pool of players, an opportunity to go down in folklore for getting them over the line etc. I can't see a massive shortage of candidates to be honest!
naughto wrote: » Money talks and the county board are penny pinchers and with the last few yrs Having cost so much they will be looking to keep the bill down
Westernyelp wrote: » I have heard some background to this regarding player welfare. Things could have been handled better on both sides. Think it's a fair outcome.
Sebastian Dangerfield wrote: » Maybe a completely naive question, but is it now generally accepted that managers get paid? I've always heard it officially denied, but whenever big name is mentioned now people question whether the CB will come up with the funds.
Sebastian Dangerfield wrote: » naughto wrote: » Money talks and the county board are penny pinchers and with the last few yrs Having cost so much they will be looking to keep the bill down Maybe a completely naive question, but is it now generally accepted that managers get paid? I've always heard it officially denied, but whenever big name is mentioned now people question whether the CB will come up with the funds.
naughto wrote: » Yes all county managers would be a nice wack. Horan with Westport is on a tidy sum breaffy, Mitchell’s are all forking out for there managers Why do you think Maugham is gone to Offaly
PARlance wrote: » Can't really agree with that tbh. If you back the manager, then you back: 1. That he will have his team in place in good time AND 2. That he will pick a good backroom team. You don't go around giving him public deadlines, at a time when an awful lot of potential candidates are caught up in Club Championship. You don't go having a meeting, to have a meeting, to interview his backroom team. The book should stop with the manager. If you trust them to be manager, then let them manage. It's clear from Horan's quotes that he feels the County Board don't operate this way. Connolly wants to have far too much influence and attention.
WanderlustIre wrote: » Sarah Rowe heading to oz.
naughto wrote: » On the beer or to play ozzy rules
ProudDUB wrote: The same player welfare issues that the independent review did not find any evidence of?
Westernyelp wrote: » There may not have been evidence. I heard it from a player. Very sensitive issue. Which was handled badly. I have a bit of sympathy for both sides if true though.
ProudDUB wrote: If it's true, then why was the independent review committee not able to verify it with the players involved, including the player you spoke to. If they didn't believe their/her claims then, why do you believe it now? No offense, but surely they are in a better position to judge than you are?