nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Should we protest against the pope's visit?

work

I believe a huge protest against the popes visit is required to show the government and church they are no longer welcome or wanted in our society. What do you think? There are many stakeholders that should protest their removal from any influence in our society. Some that come to mind are:
1) Anyone not supportive of misogyny
2) Anyone that doesn't believe in school indoctrination of children in a massive lie.
3) Anyone concerned about abusers in positions allowing abuse
4) Anyone with the most basic scientific education.
5) Anyone that doesn't support cults
6) Anyone that believes LGBT people should be treated fairly in society.
7) Anyone that believes women should have ANY control of their bodies.
8) Anyone that is not seen as equal in the church namely women children and men.

There are many other areas but I realised I have covered everyone. As such let's all go to the Phoenix park to let the Vatican know they are not welcome.
Are there any peaceful groups planning to protest?

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

4068ac1elhodqr

An_Toirpin wrote: »

The evidence suggests that past failing at digging out coverups is more due to disorgansiation and limited central power and knowledge rather than mal intent.

Which is why the Bishop up in Down was 'removed' from service, just earlier this year?

Not only did he have knowledge, but also acted improper by celebrating Mass for the paedo Fr.Finegan.

The temporary replacement Canon Brown is now helping authorities with an ongoing investigation into this, as think he worked along side Finegan in local schools.
Then along came Bishop Boyce, (already criticised for his handling of clerical sex abuse allegations when he was Bishop of Raphoe 2011).

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-44483333

It's more to do with 'improper action' and 'non-reporting of existing knowledge'.

Hitman3000

Dole Scrounging Vegan Crossfitter wrote:

Mod: Pints? is threadbanned. Please stop responding to his posts

Sound so.

Mr. CooL ICE

Mod: Pints? is threadbanned. Please stop responding to his posts

Hitman3000

An_Toirpin wrote:

The evidence suggests that past failing at digging out coverups is more due to disorgansiation and limited central power and knowledge rather than mal intent.

You are suggesting the church is bad at record keeping? Ever been to the Vatican?

Hitman3000

An_Toirpin wrote:

Getting desperate now with the auld revisionism.

Revisionism suggests making up stuff or being obtuse. I suggest like the other lad you learn some of your church's history. There was a 'railroad' which passed through the Vatican that helped senior NAZI's make it out of Europe at the end of WWII. The CC also signed a concordate with the NAZI regime before the war.

Cabaal

Omar Orange Ignoramus wrote: »

And the Archbishop of Armagh said the church faced a challenge in finding new ways of communicating “sincerely held perspectives” about the family.
”[/I]

On that note,
https://www.pressreader.com/ireland/irish-independent/20180823/281496457138367

One in three Irish families don't fit the church's traditional definition of what a family actually is.

So in the church's view, these family's aren't actually family's
:rolleyes:

So a bunch of men who deny themselves marriage, a relationship with another man/women, having children and as such will never ever have a family (unless they break Canon law) decide what a family is.

Leroy42

A few posters have raised the question as to those in the CC have not be hold to account by the state.

I think the latest statement from Mattie McGrath, where is basically tells the Ex President of Ireland to shut up, shows why. There are still plenty of people in higher positions that are very much in thrall to the CC. Remember the sweet heart deals that FF gave the CC when the abuse was coming to light. The clear aim was to protect the church, even if that meant costing the state.

An_Toirpin

Hitman3000 wrote: »

I hear Leo is asking Frank for the church's cooperation into any investigation into any abuse that happened. Frank's willingness or lack thereof should be telling. The Vatican has an opportunity to open its files and a chance to obtain some form of redemption.
Will they seize that chance? The past suggests not.

The evidence suggests that past failing at digging out coverups is more due to disorgansiation and limited central power and knowledge rather than mal intent.

Hitman3000

Mattie McGarth suggesting Mary McAleese is making people sick and tried and should get off the stage. He neglected to mention he is part of an international grouping of Catholic legislators going to meet Frank. No bias there. Personally I'm happy for her to keep highlighting the failings of the CC pity though it took so long but better late than never.

An_Toirpin

Hitman3000 wrote: »

You clearly know nothing of the links the CC had with NAZI's. Step away from the shovel.

Getting desperate now with the auld revisionism.

4068ac1elhodqr

Pints? wrote: »

Completely agree.
I don't think everyone attending the popes mass are in favour of him. Some are curious. Some are on the edge 're whole thing and want to see what he has to say

Some (most) are pensioners and elderly who were (wrongly) brought up belieivng the RCC was flawless in it's actions. Expect the average age to be up in the 60's, any children present may not be there of their own free will.

Bear in mind Francis is hundreds of times more likeable that the last German pope, if it was Benny it wouldn't be nearly as much interest Meanwhile...

Archbishop Diarmuid Martin has said the majority of victims of clerical child abuse have yet to come forward and he called for a more supportive judicial system to assist them.

He said the number of victims in Ireland was “immense” due to the many roles the Catholic Church played over many years.

And the Archbishop of Armagh said the church faced a challenge in finding new ways of communicating “sincerely held perspectives” about the family.

“In the aftermath of child abuse scandals and other shameful episodes of the past, there are those who feel they can no longer trust our message, perhaps because they have been directly hurt and betrayed in their families by their experience of Church, or because the revelations of such heinous crimes have shocked them to the core.”

Hitman3000

Pints? wrote:

Not as deep as the hole you'd bury all Catholics in Adolf

You clearly know nothing of the links the CC had with NAZI's. Step away from the shovel.

Leroy42

Pints? wrote: »

Completely agree.
I don't think everyone attending the popes mass are in favour of him. Some are curious. Some are on the edge 're whole thing and want to see what he has to say

Whether they agree or not is irrelevant. The numbers that show up will taken taken as support for the CC. People will, in years to come, only report on the number of people that attended, they won't break it down.

It seems odd to me that anyone would want to hear what he has to say or have a closer look at him. We know where he stands, where the organisation he has lived almost his entire life in service to stands.

If, by now, people do see that the words of the CC mean nothing, they can only be judged on their actions, then I really don't know.

Let them open all the files, put up with whatever investigations need to be undertaken, pay for the counciling of these impacted by abuse, set up new centres, operated independently, to heal the wounds.

Come back when they have rooted out each and every person that had knowledge of abuse or cover up, but failed to act. But we all know that cannot happen. Because the very people that could make it happen, the Pope, cardinals etc, are the very people that facilitated it to happen in the first place.

For them the CC comes before anything else. The victims, the state, the law, morals, even God. CC must be protected. That is how they have been brought up. They cannot be the solution. It is almost unfair to ask that they would be as it would involve such a monumental change in their thinking.

beans

Putting the 'God' in 'Godwin'

Pints?

Hitman3000 wrote: »

Ah let him at, rarely does one see someone dig such a deep hole in such a short time frame.

Not as deep as the hole you'd bury all Catholics in Adolf

Pints?

Leroy42 wrote: »

I, thankfully, do not have any direct evidence. What I have is the reports from the various investigations. The latest of which from PA in the US, is pretty shocking even when we know so much already.

I also have seen the recent letter from the pope acknowledging that the CC has failed in many aspects in the issue of child abuse and the cover up.

There is clearly a case to be answered by those in positions of authority, be it the Garda, the local TD etc, and I am at a loss as to why more has not been done.

But I think the CC still holds a significant amount of power. 500k people is a significant amount of voters, the Vatican is still extremely powerful. I wouldn't let the CC do anything in Ireland if I had my way, but alas there is a significant amount of people that are so devoted to the CC that my voice would be drowned out. Whatever the protests are this weekend, they will be dwarfed by the numbers attending the masses etc.

Completely agree.
I don't think everyone attending the popes mass are in favour of him. Some are curious. Some are on the edge 're whole thing and want to see what he has to say

volchitsa

Leroy42 wrote: »

Hold on a second. Are you agreeing that abuse and cover up has taken place in the CC and asking why the authorities aren't been held to account?

Or are you claiming that since the authorities haven't acted (in your opinion) then you don't believe it happened or if it did it wasn't as big as some people think and certainly not due to the actions of the church itself?

Probably the latter. That's certainly what the other poster "Irish Kings" was at anyway, with his spamming fake questions. Not sure why they're allowed to get away with it, TBH.

Sycamore Tree

Pints? wrote: »

Leroy42 wrote: »

I don't believe that that is true. I think that a majority of people in this country, of all religions and none, would put child protections and the stopping of cover ups ahead of their membership of an organisation

Child abuse and cover ups have nothing to do with their organisation. It's not as if you have to abuse a few kids to join. If so then I'd protest.

Huh??

A live one here.

Sycamore Tree

Pints? wrote: »

Leroy42 wrote: »

I don't believe that that is true. I think that a majority of people in this country, of all religions and none, would put child protections and the stopping of cover ups ahead of their membership of an organisation

Child abuse and cover ups have nothing to do with their organisation. It's not as if you have to abuse a few kids to join. If so then I'd protest.

Huh??

A live one here.

Leroy42

Pints? wrote: »

I'm saying abuse and cover up definitely happened. I'm suggesting the authorities aren't particularly good at their jobs if all the evidence they need to convict the Pope is in the Vatican and is so known that even random posters on boards know where it is. Maybe they just haven't been told where it is. You've clearly got evidence to take down the church. Report to your nearest garda station

I, thankfully, do not have any direct evidence. What I have is the reports from the various investigations. The latest of which from PA in the US, is pretty shocking even when we know so much already.

I also have seen the recent letter from the pope acknowledging that the CC has failed in many aspects in the issue of child abuse and the cover up.

There is clearly a case to be answered by those in positions of authority, be it the Garda, the local TD etc, and I am at a loss as to why more has not been done.

But I think the CC still holds a significant amount of power. 500k people is a significant amount of voters, the Vatican is still extremely powerful. I wouldn't let the CC do anything in Ireland if I had my way, but alas there is a significant amount of people that are so devoted to the CC that my voice would be drowned out. Whatever the protests are this weekend, they will be dwarfed by the numbers attending the masses etc.

Hitman3000

Pints? wrote:

I'm just not prejudiced is all. Enjoy Hitler youth!

Ironically the former pope Benny was a member of the Hitler jungen.

Pints?

Cabaal wrote: »

A warrant...thats a joke right?
You do realise the Vatican is seen as an actual state/country right?

Ireland can no more get a warrant to get Vatican records then the UK Government can get a warranty to get Irish government records.

For the third time, stop showing yourself up, its laughable at this stage

I'm just not prejudiced is all. Enjoy Hitler youth!

Hitman3000

Cabaal wrote:

For the third time, stop showing yourself up, its laughable at this stage

Ah let him at, rarely does one see someone dig such a deep hole in such a short time frame.

Cabaal

Pints? wrote: »

And if it's common knowledge they have these records why aren't the authorities getting a warrant for them? Which legally they could as the church can't withold information on criminal case. They're not in the confession box

A warrant...thats a joke right?
You do realise the Vatican is seen as an actual state/country right?

Ireland can no more get a warrant to get Vatican records then the UK Government can get a warranty to get Irish government records.

For the third time, stop showing yourself up, its laughable at this stage

Hitman3000

I hear Leo is asking Frank for the church's cooperation into any investigation into any abuse that happened. Frank's willingness or lack thereof should be telling. The Vatican has an opportunity to open its files and a chance to obtain some form of redemption.
Will they seize that chance? The past suggests not.

Pints?

Leroy42 wrote: »

Hold on a second. Are you agreeing that abuse and cover up has taken place in the CC and asking why the authorities aren't been held to account?

Or are you claiming that since the authorities haven't acted (in your opinion) then you don't believe it happened or if it did it wasn't as big as some people think and certainly not due to the actions of the church itself?

I'm saying abuse and cover up definitely happened. I'm suggesting the authorities aren't particularly good at their jobs if all the evidence they need to convict the Pope is in the Vatican and is so known that even random posters on boards know where it is. Maybe they just haven't been told where it is. You've clearly got evidence to take down the church. Report to your nearest garda station

Leroy42

Mutant z wrote: »

Just don't go to it if you don't want to go protesting about it seems pretty pointless to me i suspect the ones who do want to see him will go regardless and the ones who don't want to see him won't.

Its that type of attitude that lets these type of things go on for so long.

What is the point going to the gardai, what is the point trying to seek justice?

Luckily, they are people, like in the case of the Hillsborough 96, that took the attitude that even though things happen slowly, making your voice heard is important.

Do you think that the changes that the CC is so quick to point to would have happened without the likes of victims speaking up? Don't you think the likes of the reporters that simply wouldn't let the story die had a noticeable effect?

Even if all it achieves is to give those affected the knowledge that they are not alone, that the rest of the country does care for their pain, and that the country is not simply happy to clap along an forget. That in itself is very powerful when faced with such a significantly powerful organisation

Leroy42

Pints? wrote: »

And if it's common knowledge they have these records why aren't the authorities getting a warrant for them? Which legally they could as the church can't withold information on criminal case. They're not in the confession box

Hold on a second. Are you agreeing that abuse and cover up has taken place in the CC and asking why the authorities aren't been held to account?

Or are you claiming that since the authorities haven't acted (in your opinion) then you don't believe it happened or if it did it wasn't as big as some people think and certainly not due to the actions of the church itself?

Pints?

Mutant z wrote: »

Just don't go to it if you don't want to go protesting about it seems pretty pointless to me i suspect the ones who do want to see him will go regardless and the ones who don't want to see him won't.

Well said

Pints?

Cabaal wrote: »

Hard to properly investigate when the Vatican won't release its detailed records, they know what priests abused and what priests were moved around for abuse by them.

So again, we're back to the issue is with the Vatican and the organisation.

And if it's common knowledge they have these records why aren't the authorities getting a warrant for them? Which legally they could as the church can't withold information on criminal case. They're not in the confession box