nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Roseanne fired but Sarah Jeong hired?

splashuum

I find it incredible that main stream media can pick and choose who and what they define as racist.
Sarah Jeong has just been hired by the New York Times despite her clear hatred against white people. What is even more astounding is that the NYT have doubled down on Jeong after seeing her tweets. They have now publicly declared a vote of confidence in her.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Will I Am Not

WinnyThePoo wrote: »

Yes your right. Don't know why anybody would deny that .

Some people can’t bring themselves to say it :pac:

WinnyThePoo

Will I Am Not wrote: »

She is a grade A idiot and also a racist.

Yes your right. Don't know why anybody would deny that .

2 Scoops

WinnyThePoo wrote: »

I think shes a grade A idiot. Companies are free to hire and fire who they want.

Interesting choice of word there Winny.

Will I Am Not

WinnyThePoo wrote: »

I think shes a grade A idiot. Companies are free to hire and fire who they want.

She is a grade A idiot and also a racist.

WinnyThePoo

professore wrote: »

I asked a question about the media labelling of all sorts of people as alt right. Then I got a bizarre reply about a victimhood narrative. I know so little about the alt right I didn't even know who coined the phrase or what it meant exactly. As it's used its a vehicle to associate the far right with the centre right and centrists as far as I can see.

You made the claim the that the term alt right was created in 2016. Thats false.\\

You then made the claim alt right is used as a catch all term for people on the right. Once again thats a false claim.

'I know so little about the alt right I didn't even know who coined the phrase or what it meant exactly.'

Googles your friend, theres also search engines like Bing out there.

' As it's used its a vehicle to associate the far right with the centre right and centrists as far as I can see.'

There a dullards out there that try and call everyone under the sun labels. Unfortunately in the real world though if your subscribe to far right politics in america, you most likely call yourself Alt-right.

DickSwiveller Returns

Brian? wrote: »

I’m excusing nothing.

Have you any proof I’m a hypocrite? If not, I want an apology.

Brian, I apologise for calling you a hypocrite. It was unnecessarily personal.

The point I was trying to make is that certain posters here throw out the accusation of racism/bigotry at will (I myself have been called racist for calling for tighter immigration controls), but then we when we have a clear example of racism from someone who is on the liberal wing people are trying to make excuses. Even anchapailldorcha, hardly a white supremacist, has said it's blatant racism.

givyjoe

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

Don't be.

On Trump:

On Richard Spencer:

On Ben Shapiro:

Deeeeeeelicious.

DickSwiveller Returns

ancapailldorcha wrote: »

I'm about as liberal as they come and, yes. She's quite blatantly a racist. I'd also add that I think she's the worst kind of attention seeker who uses social injustice to feed her own spiteful, self-centred agenda regardless of the damage it does to good causes. Basically, a human tapeworm.

Well said.

WinnyThePoo

Will I Am Not wrote: »

What’s your opinion Winny? Do you think it’s double standards? Is she a racist? Should she be fired/not hired considering precedence?

I think shes a grade A idiot. Companies are free to hire and fire who they want.

professore

Will I Am Not wrote: »

What’s your opinion Winny? Do you think it’s double standards? Is she a racist? Should she be fired/not hired considering precedence?

I asked a question about the media labelling of all sorts of people as alt right. Then I got a bizarre reply about a victimhood narrative. I know so little about the alt right I didn't even know who coined the phrase or what it meant exactly. As it's used its a vehicle to associate the far right with the centre right and centrists as far as I can see.

Ken.

Mod- DONTMATTER don't post here again. Reason-Trolling.

ancapailldorcha

Will I Am Not wrote: »

What’s your opinion Winny? Do you think it’s double standards? Is she a racist? Should she be fired/not hired considering precedence?

I'm about as liberal as they come and, yes. She's quite blatantly a racist. I'd also add that I think she's the worst kind of attention seeker who uses social injustice to feed her own spiteful, self-centred agenda regardless of the damage it does to good causes. Basically, a human tapeworm.

Will I Am Not

WinnyThePoo wrote: »

Absolutely love the victimhood narrative. Keep it up.

What’s your opinion Winny? Do you think it’s double standards? Is she a racist? Should she be fired/not hired considering precedence?

professore

WinnyThePoo wrote: »

Absolutely love the victimhood narrative. Keep it up.

What are you talking about???? What victimhood narrative? I don't speak SJW sorry.

SnakePlissken

Brian? wrote: »

Have you any proof I’m a hypocrite? If not, I want an apology.

Someone's feeling especially precious today.

WinnyThePoo

professore wrote: »

I wasn't aware of that. So they are just another term for good old fashioned far right. Why is pretty much everyone right of Fidel Castro called alt right then?

Absolutely love the victimhood narrative. Keep it up.

Call Me Jimmy

SnazzyPig wrote: »

I find that anyone claiming to be laughing is most likely seething with resentment.

Nobody else is capable of calm discussion :P writing a post that isn't multi-dimensional satire means you need to kick back and enjoy the view of the pale blue dot.

CrankyHaus

Is the NYT still even a good newspaper?

I go on the site from time to time but rarely find anything great.

Didn't it have some very dodgy reporting supporting the invasion of Iraq, with Ahmed Chalabi as the main source?

It's halcyon days of Sheahan and Halberstam revealing the truth about Vietnam seem to be well and truly gone.

SnazzyPig

DONTMATTER wrote: »

Honestly? To laugh at the angry men.

I find that anyone claiming to be laughing is most likely seething with resentment.

Nermal

Sand wrote: »

I see some people are attempting to diminish this as just Twitter, with no real importance. The reality is there is a pervasive anti-white racism that is increasingly brazen in the US.

Great post. Our most important institutions are being captured by this ideology. It has spread from education to the police, to the courts, to the media and to large corporations.

Mutant z

You can always rely on the left to show up their blatant hypocritical double standards of what they believe is racist.

suicide_circus

2 Scoops wrote: »

Here she is "trolling" at Harvard. What a disgusting specimen she is with no self awareness or gratitude for all the "white men" who died in the Korean war fighting for her freedom. Indoctrination is real..

look at her culturally appropriating that microphone invented by the white men she hates

DickSwiveller Returns

Brian? wrote: »

I’m excusing nothing.

Have you any proof I’m a hypocrite? If not, I want an apology.

I think Outlaw Pete has covered that

2 Scoops

Here she is "trolling" at Harvard. What a disgusting specimen she is with no self awareness or gratitude for all the "white men" who died in the Korean war fighting for her freedom. Indoctrination is real..

Brian?

DickSwiveller Returns wrote: »

These have been some of your replies:

"I’d like to hear more. That’s all I’m saying. The video is clearly edited to make her look bad. If she is what you say she is, a racist man hater, why the poorly edited video? It strips the statement of any context or nuance"

"They are a poor attempt at humour"

"I thought it was a reference to outraged white people. I could be entirely wrong though"

You seem to be going to great lengths to excuse her of blatant racism, but if the shoe was on the other foot I think it's extremely unlikely that you would be coming to their defence, stressing the importance of context etc. Have you read all her racist tweets?

I’m excusing nothing.

Have you any proof I’m a hypocrite? If not, I want an apology.

professore

WinnyThePoo wrote: »

Your post has now jumped the shark. The term wasn't coined by the the centre or the left.

I wasn't aware of that. So they are just another term for good old fashioned far right. Why is pretty much everyone right of Fidel Castro called alt right then?

Sand

I see some people are attempting to diminish this as just Twitter, with no real importance. The reality is there is a pervasive anti-white racism that is increasingly brazen in the US. Its important because its seeping out of colleges and into political groups where racebaiting is now core to the Democratic agenda. Just this weekend, at the 'Netroot Nation' event, speakers told the crowd

“I see some of you are uncomfortable. Your white fragility is showing. Your white tears are showing – I’m ready to drink them,” one activist told the crowd.

But we’ve got way too many of them [white people] in the House and the Senate.

This followed on another senior Democrat, Symone Sanders indicating that the most important qualification for the Democrat leadership is that they not be white.

"In my opinion, we don't need white people leading the Democratic Party right now," she told CNN's Brianna Keilar Wednesday on "Wolf."

Sarah Jeong's comments, and the NYT's endorsement of them come in that context of open, anti-white racism being normalised so that its a qualification in the Democratic party. This does affect us, even here outside the US. The US is the cultural centre of the world. As racism becomes normalised, it seeps into the rest of the world. That is not good for Europeans. Equally, the Democrats will send politicians which emerge from this cauldron of racism to take office in the Senate, Congress and even the White House. Is it in Ireland or Europe's interests to have the US influenced by a group openly hostile to and dismissive of white people?

White Americans see it too. Polls show White millennials are fleeing the Democratic party which is openly hostile to them. It is not just Twitter.

WinnyThePoo

professore wrote: »

These are far right. And this is the SPLC, who classified people like Maajid Nawaz as an "anti-Muslim extremist" when in fact he is a Muslim himself fighting extremism of all sorts... https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jun/18/southern-poverty-law-center-settlement-maajid-nawa/

Taking the most extreme views of the far right and applying them to anyone on the right is a very dishonest tactic. That's why alt-right was invented. Same technique the Nazis used with the Jews. Find an extreme example of a money grabbing dishonest jew and equate all Jews with them.

Your post has now jumped the shark. The term wasn't coined by the the centre or the left.

WinnyThePoo

professore wrote: »

These are far right. And this is the SPLC, who classified people like Maajid Nawaz as an "anti-Muslim extremist" when in fact he is a Muslim himself fighting extremism of all sorts... https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jun/18/southern-poverty-law-center-settlement-maajid-nawa/

You made a claim that the term alt right..was created out of thin air in 2016. Research proves you wrong.

professore

WinnyThePoo wrote: »

https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/alt-right

Sounds like your wrong.

These are far right. And this is the SPLC, who classified people like Maajid Nawaz as an "anti-Muslim extremist" when in fact he is a Muslim himself fighting extremism of all sorts... https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jun/18/southern-poverty-law-center-settlement-maajid-nawa/

Taking the most extreme views of the far right and applying them to anyone on the right is a very dishonest tactic. That's why alt-right was invented. Same technique the Nazis used with the Jews. Find an extreme example of a money grabbing dishonest jew and equate all Jews with them.