P_1 wrote: » Jesus H Christ I'm not defending bigotry. Look yes it is a bloody shítty world full of assholes, TERFs, SWERFs, biggots and whatever else is waiting to come crawling out of the woodwork. But you know what isn't going to bloody help that, misconstruing what someone who is on the same fúcking side as you is saying and taking offence when they try to introduce some nuance to the conversation. The world isn't black and white and if you try to view it in that way you're only going to hurt yourself.
JackTaylorFan wrote: » Are you done now? I listen and talk to people who want to understand and be educated - I don't waste my time on trolls and bigots. There is a clear distinction and it's often one very easily made. Thanks though.
P_1 wrote: » Its interactions like this that make me and many like me reluctant to properly engage with the left in this country.
JackTaylorFan wrote: » Just so you know, I actually don't care what you, on the right, think. Only the people responsible for our health care. If you want to remain ignorant... cool. Ta
P_1 wrote: » Eh on the right? Cop on to yourself will you. I abhor them yet were stuck with them ruling over us no small part due the left being unable to organise a loss up in a brewery due to constant infighting and shouting down those who want the same thing but are more interested in finding practical ways to achieve them beyond making loud noises
JackTaylorFan wrote: » Nah... not really... unless you happen to be of the mindset that a Klan member holds an equal and fair opinion on a discussion concerning the validity of black people in America Sometimes there is only one side worth hearing. Stop being an apologist for bigots already.
JackTaylorFan wrote: » Right now, it's a ****ing depressing world for the majority of transpeople, because of the bigotry you are defending. Funny that...
P_1 wrote: » Any other suggestions on practical ways we can enact change?
https://www.facebook.com/ThisIsMeIreland/
Jared Skinny Collar wrote: » Of course it's up for debate..
JackTaylorFan wrote: » - Get behind the This Is Me campaign
JackTaylorFan wrote: » The debate people on Boards want is not about improving health care for trans people, it's about denying it altogether. That is the reality. Also, does Boards sanction discussion on best health care practices for cancer patients -i.e medication etc.? Let alone where doctors, relatives and patients are all being accused of child abuse? No, is the answer. But yet, that is the only kind of debate that happens on this site when it comes to trans healthcare.
people on here searching for biased third party "research" on the matter
Jared Skinny Collar wrote: » Are you sure no is the answer? I'm sure there are forums discussing lots of different long term illnesses and the various medications available to patients. You can't deny the controversial nature of puberty blockers. To say sounds a lot like Trump crying "fake news" at things that don't suit him. Moral grandstanding and decrying anyone who raises even the slightest of questions a bigot serves no purpose except to protect yourself from perceived threats, and it does not help your movement.
P_1 wrote: » Thanks for the link and apologies for any crossed swords. It's easy to get snippy at someone especially when we both want the same thing
JackTaylorFan wrote: » I tell you what, when you get back to me with the relevant doctorates in medicine, I'll entertain your concerns. Until then, nah... Thanks...
JackTaylorFan wrote: » The debate people on Boards want is not about improving health care for trans people, it's about denying it altogether. That is the reality. Also, does Boards allow discussion on best health care practices for cancer patients -i.e medication etc.? Let alone where doctors, relatives and patients are all being accused of child abuse? No, is the answer. But yet, that is the only kind of debate that happens on this site when it comes to trans healthcare.
P_1 wrote: » The only concern I'd have re puberty blockers is that (well at least from what I can tell) the current generation of people taking them are essentially guinea pigs. They might have no negative effects but we just do not know yet. Now if you go into that eyes wide open that's not an issue.
P_1 wrote: » The standard of debate on it here is frankly shocking tbh. The only concern I'd have re puberty blockers is that (well at least from what I can tell) the current generation of people taking them are essentially guinea pigs. They might have no negative effects but we just do not know yet. Now if you go into that eyes wide open that's not an issue. I appreciate how sensitive a topic this is and I hope you take this in the spirit is intended in.
Jared Skinny Collar wrote: » A child can't legally make such a decision. Going into it "eyes wide open" is just not possible, there's a reason we have ages of consent and other things, they haven't reached mental maturity yet.
JackTaylorFan wrote: » I will refer you to the same link I posted in response to P_1 - I will not directly engage with you and your dismissing of children's ability to understand themselves again.
JackTaylorFan wrote: » As I said, I'm not participating in a debate on this issue (not on Boards). I will talk about bringing the HSE in-line with WPATH standards and how best to make that a reality, but I am not engaging in a discussion that will inevitably lead to attacks on doctors, parents and transpeople. And I would hope the Mods here see the distinction between these two things as well. If you want to see firsthand how trangender kids are doing on blockers here's an unbiased documentary from the one and only Louis Theroux - https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x69kbj7
Jared Skinny Collar wrote: » There's a shocker. Here's a question - do you believe there should be an age of consent?
P_1 wrote: » Now theres far more nuance to that to be fair. With the right checks and balances in place it has the potential to save a lot of people a lot of unnecessary pain
JackTaylorFan wrote: » Lord, look where we are going already... Are you seriously trying to conflate the sexual abuse of a minor with healthcare for a minor? So done...
Jared Skinny Collar wrote: » No ?
Jared Skinny Collar wrote: » How do we know what the right checks and balances are? No ?
P_1 wrote: » Also just for clarity I presume you're referring to the medical age of consent as opposed to the sexual one here. Apologies if I'm putting words in your mouth.
JackTaylorFan wrote: » Yeah... sure... :rolleyes:
P_1 wrote: » That's the major question. It's such a cluster**** of a political football these days that finding an unbiased medical report or reccomemdation is difficult to find. Also just for clarity I presume you're referring to the medical age of consent as opposed to the sexual one here. Apologies if I'm putting words in your mouth.
JackTaylorFan wrote: » Nah, they were doing what everyone on boards who comes on here to attack us does... Dog whistling
Jared Skinny Collar wrote: » Keep fighting the good fight my dude.