Sand wrote: » The whole affair reminds me of the release of Nelson Mandela in 1990. Same sort of positive vibe to it. Who knows, Robinson could end up as British PM too.
El Weirdo wrote: » https://twitter.com/DailyMirror/status/1014826383904821248
Hapax Legomenon wrote: » Imagine how disheartening that must have been for poor Tommy. ****in' LOL
TomSweeney wrote: » https://youtu.be/QoAxe0J3k3c Human rights lawyers saying he should have been in jail. Where he was subjected to mental torture. These would be the same "human rights" lawyers that would fight tooth and nail for an Islamic terrorist's rights.
Omackeral wrote: » He's definitely the white Mandela now that you mention it.
DickSwiveller Returns wrote: » Looks like a lot of ordinary British people are getting sick of what's been going in their country in the last few years - ridiculous levels of mass immigration which have made certain cities unrecognisable from 30 or 40 years ago , grooming gangs allowed to operate because authority were afraid of being called waycist; a useless PC political class in London who sneer at anyone who dares to bring up these issues. Looks like it's going to boil over soon enough.
Strabanimal wrote: » Sand wrote: » The whole affair reminds me of the release of Nelson Mandela in 1990. Same sort of positive vibe to it. Who knows, Robinson could end up as British PM too. Location: The Pale, West Britain
Strabanimal wrote: » DickSwiveller Returns wrote: » Looks like a lot of ordinary British people are getting sick of what's been going in their country in the last few years - ridiculous levels of mass immigration which have made certain cities unrecognisable from 30 or 40 years ago , grooming gangs allowed to operate because authority were afraid of being called waycist; a useless PC political class in London who sneer at anyone who dares to bring up these issues. Looks like it's going to boil over soon enough. Location: The Pale, West Britain
SnakePlissken wrote: » Getting plenty mileage out of your one "joke" I see.
Mike Hoch wrote: » I should preamble that I am as non PC as one can get, but the historic London murder tolls make for interesting reading.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_London#Murder The London murder toll was much higher in 1990, when both the city population and the minority population were smaller. Granted, the vast majority of murders seem to involve black folk, but it begs the question- who was doing all the murdering in 1990, at a higher level, when London still had a larger white working class? Is there a reflective murder rate 28 years later in border parts of Essex and Kent and wherever else the children of London's original chavs are currently growing up? You certainly have a good point, that much of London's current crime is committed by people who should be removed from the state. I wonder though, what became of the offspring of the criminals of 1990.
Captain Obvious wrote: » Now and then you guys come out with some proper zingers.
Omackeral wrote: » I actually took a break from being an angry man to make a tongue in cheek little gag and compare auld Thomas to Mandiba. Granted, it's no Location: The Pale, West Britain but it was light-hearted nonetheless.
DickSwiveller Returns wrote: » I didn't say anything about murder. I'm talking about cities being transformed by mass immigration, and a lots of people being unhappy with it. Go to Birmingham, London etc. and you'll see what I mean.
Captain Obvious wrote: » How was he subject to mental torture?
Captain Obvious wrote: » It's quite hard to tell when it comes to followers of people like Robinson and Trump.
Odhinn wrote: » They asked him to both walk upright and talk coherently at the same time.
Omackeral wrote: » They're all the same as each other, is it? You're so above everyone on your side of the political spectrum aren't you? FWIW I've zero interest in anything Trump related. Nada, zilch. I'm not a full-on supporter of Tommy Robinson either but that doesn't mean I automatically discount all of what he says. Some of his stuff holds water and is interesting to a degree.
AfterLife wrote: » Irish people and Irish culture are part of the fabric of the two cities mentioned. I have family that emigrated to both of them cities in the 60's and 70's. Part of the deal when you have an empire is that it will come to you. Do you have a problem with Irish people in these cities?
DickSwiveller Returns wrote: » What are you on about now? *I* haven't a problem. I said the *British people* have a problem. Successive polls have shown over 70 per cent in favour of stricter immigration controls. Last year the number was above 300 thousand net. What's the empire got to do with anything?? It has been a deliberate policy by successive governments to flood the country with immigrants. There was no onus on them to take these people in.
DickSwiveller Returns wrote: » And nice little whereabouts Re the Irish. There is an estimated 2 million people in Britain who can barely speak English. If you go to Birmingham or plenty of towns in the North you'll see the radical change that has taken place in communities; radically different from what the Irish brought. Whole neighbourhoods that look like busy streets in Calcutta. A radically different religion that is growing year by year. This has lead, in many towns like Burnley and Bradford, to 2 communities living side by side who have nothing to do with each other. Add to that the recent grooming scandals and subsequent cover ups and people are getting fed up with being ignored. You can believe what you read in the Guardian - that Britain is a multicultural paradise - but the reality on the ground is very different.
AfterLife wrote: » Why do you think there is so many Pakistanis, Caribbeans, Irish etc in Britain? It is very much to do with Empire. "Due to the historical relations between the two countries, immigration to the UK from the region which is now Pakistan began in small numbers in the mid-19th century. During the mid-nineteenth century, parts of what is now Pakistan came under the British Raj and people from those regions served as soldiers in the British Indian Army, and some were deployed in other parts of the British Empire. However, it was following the Second World War, the break-up of the British Empire and the independence of Pakistan, that Pakistani immigration to the United Kingdom increased, especially during the 1950s and 1960s. This was made easier as Pakistan was a member of the Commonwealth." Right, so we've established that there was no onus on the British to bring these people in to the country. You never answered my question. There was Irish areas in this two cities as well. They weren't particularly well liked either. What question? I'm not talking about the Irish. Read what I wrote. I can't be arsed repeating myself.
AfterLife wrote: » Why do you think there is so many Pakistanis, Caribbeans, Irish etc in Britain? It is very much to do with Empire. "Due to the historical relations between the two countries, immigration to the UK from the region which is now Pakistan began in small numbers in the mid-19th century. During the mid-nineteenth century, parts of what is now Pakistan came under the British Raj and people from those regions served as soldiers in the British Indian Army, and some were deployed in other parts of the British Empire. However, it was following the Second World War, the break-up of the British Empire and the independence of Pakistan, that Pakistani immigration to the United Kingdom increased, especially during the 1950s and 1960s. This was made easier as Pakistan was a member of the Commonwealth."
You never answered my question. There was Irish areas in this two cities as well. They weren't particularly well liked either.
DickSwiveller Returns wrote: » Right, so we've established that there was no onus on the British to bring these people in to the country. What question? I'm not talking about the Irish. Read what I wrote. I can't be arsed repeating myself. They were under no obligation but they welcomed them in to their army and their country. You are talking about immigration. Guess what? The Irish emigrating to Britain are immigrants. You can keep repeating yourself all you like but if you addressed the question you would have to say something different.
Right, so we've established that there was no onus on the British to bring these people in to the country. What question? I'm not talking about the Irish. Read what I wrote. I can't be arsed repeating myself.
AfterLife wrote: » DickSwiveller Returns wrote: » They were under no obligation but they welcomed them in to their army and their country. Who's 'they'? The politicians or the people? You are talking about immigration. Guess what? The Irish emigrating to Britain are immigrants. You can keep repeating yourself all you like but if you addressed the question you would have to say something different. I'm talking about the situation on the ground in Britain. The immigrants from the Middle East bring a completely different culture, a different religion, different languages. Have you been to cities like Birmingham, blackburn or Burnley and seen the radical change to entire neighbourhoods. These changes have taken place in a relatively short period and, understandably, people are getting tired of it. Now, care to deal with any of points or are you just going to play the waycist card as usual??
DickSwiveller Returns wrote: » They were under no obligation but they welcomed them in to their army and their country. Who's 'they'? The politicians or the people? You are talking about immigration. Guess what? The Irish emigrating to Britain are immigrants. You can keep repeating yourself all you like but if you addressed the question you would have to say something different. I'm talking about the situation on the ground in Britain. The immigrants from the Middle East bring a completely different culture, a different religion, different languages. Have you been to cities like Birmingham, blackburn or Burnley and seen the radical change to entire neighbourhoods. These changes have taken place in a relatively short period and, understandably, people are getting tired of it. Now, care to deal with any of points or are you just going to play the waycist card as usual??
They were under no obligation but they welcomed them in to their army and their country.
You are talking about immigration. Guess what? The Irish emigrating to Britain are immigrants. You can keep repeating yourself all you like but if you addressed the question you would have to say something different.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://www.boards.ie/applications/dashboard/design/images/banned.png)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w4.vanillicon.com/v2/4c2f272c464d99a9eee64a80fbe71a0c.svg)
