Mitch Connor wrote: » No it doesn't. there is very little to indicate that it looks to be a done deal. ONE source saying we have agreed a deal with him (same source saying we weren't interested in him at all a couple of weeks ago), which also states we have not agreed a fee with Juve - which is a HUGE step away from being a 'done deal'.
brinty wrote: » Mitch don't forget the person you responded to has "sources" in Turin.... so he knows more than all of us.. #delusions I'd echo your sentiments though in reality agree a deal with a player (assuming we were allowed speak to them in the first place) is a long way from agreeing a deal with the club.
Adamocovic wrote: » Apologies if I missed it but didn't see any posts about Luke Shaw. Him on his holidays attracted a lot of criticism and attention, people furious that he had let himself go enjoying his holidays rather than starting to put in an effort early and begin his training. Then it emerges that he is in Dubai with our head of strength and conditioning Gary Walker training early one-to-one to prepare for the start of pre-season, and unless I missed it no real mention at all. I know people will dismiss the relevance of it and use his perceived obesity as the base of their argument, but in reality he's doing exactly what many complained he wasn't a couple of days ago. Hopefully it's a sign of the work he will put in.
Lord TSC wrote: » Did Castles say we weren't interested? My thought is he's the only one been pushing it right since the season ended.
Lukker- wrote: » Castles said on his podcast that ye have agreed personal terms with Sandro. Best of luck to ye! Chelsea had agreed personal terms with him very early last summer and still couldn't get a deal done. Juve might be more willing to sell this season though as he very clearly had his head turned for the majority of last season, although his form did pick up.
Mitch Connor wrote: » Done deal.
bangkok wrote: » I said looks a done deal..
Mitch Connor wrote: » How can it look a done deal if its not a done deal?
bangkok wrote: » Same way fred looked a done deal 3 weeks ago when it wasnt a done deal. Same way mahrez looks a done deal to city even though its not a done deal
Cotts72 wrote: » are you saying Jorginho isn't a done deal either???:):D;):pac:
Adamocovic wrote: » What's everyone's gripe with using the phrase "looks like a done deal"? One of the most used phrases when it comes to footballing transfers. Even giving a quick search on the Football Forum shows up thousands of results. Hope everyone is as captious towards all the other posts where it is used.
Mitch Connor wrote: » My gripe with it was that it was used in relation to a deal that doesn't look anywhere close to being done. Also (and to a different post) Fred looked a done deal a few weeks ago because it was. Contract signed, fee agreed, medical done, pictures done etc - just waiting for the work permit - no issue with that being called a done deal. With Sandro we have: Signed contract: No. Medical done: No. Fee agreed: No. Media pictures done: No. Interviews done: No. Work Permit applied for: No. In what world does that look like a done deal?
Lord TSC wrote: » BBC saying Juve have offered 88m for Ronnie I always thought if he left Real, it would be to us. I KNOW we don't need him. But still...
StringerBell wrote: » Happy birthday to the one and only Mars Bar!
brinty wrote: » Happy birthday Mars, hope it's a great day
Mars Bar wrote: Thank you both! I got a cramp in my hamstring for the first time so that's just an excellent start to being 29.