Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Which organisation is he a member of?
pearcider wrote: » I know you're a troll but the IRA formed as a result of the policies of a violent and sectarian state. The vast majority down south supported them in their struggle against the orange lunatics. Lets not completely revise history to garner a few thanks on boards. The RUC and their ilk were also murderous bastards.
Aegir wrote: » Wow, have you told the highly paid and highly trained people that run state security to tell them this piece of shocking news? I’m sure they had absolutely no idea about this.
Del.Monte wrote: » Oh dear, obviously written by somebody too young to remember the Troubles? The vast majority down south supported them - Lol - sure they did, as the IRA threatened to bring down civil war on the whole populace down here and routinely shot members of our police force, kidnapped people and ran kangaroo courts. A wonderful bunch altogether. :rolleyes:
Patww79 wrote: » This post has been deleted.
martingriff wrote: » RIGHT SO. No evidence just an extreme nationalist who would like to do to Britian what you claim Drew Harris want to do to us.
DONTMATTER wrote: » That statement looks more like he's an extreme partitionist!!
martingriff wrote: » Had to google that
DONTMATTER wrote: » Google what?
Spanish Eyes wrote: » You have no proof of that whatsoever. Anyway the destruction of law and order I think that is being achieved by our current Force as we speak. They certainly do not seem to have any loyalty to our citizens, just themselves. I will give Drew Harris the five years and we shall see. It certainly cannot be any worse than the omnishambles and corruption/nepotism that has already gone on in the Force already surely. Time for a cleanout.
DONTMATTER wrote: » He was in the ruc and had close links to the British security forces who committed some disgusting murders.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » 2 very important words there! Any evidence that he was involved in any shady business? Also you seem to have forgotten your condemnation of murders by republican paramilitaries of innocent people. Any chance of that in your next reply please?
DONTMATTER wrote: » Any evidence that Gerry Adams was in the IRA? I condemn all murders from anyone, the IRA, British army, SinnFéin whoever! I already said that I was against murderers pages ago! We need justice for all the victims, appointing a former ruc man won't help open up the case for the families of the Dublin and Monaghan bombings for example.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » And you know this how?
dxhound2005 wrote: » He only wants two years. His real ambition is to be Chief Constable of the PSNI, and to be eligible he has to serve at least two years in a senior role in another force. Normally that would be on the GB mainland but the Garda position will probably be good to satisfy the criteria.
steddyeddy wrote: » There's a lot of people saying that this in preparation for a united Ireland. Interesting video on Newsnight stating that post-Brexit communication about such an event are already taking place. Some senior unionist figures are even changing their minds.
DONTMATTER wrote: » Well as he had close links to mi5, I highly doubt he will as it would seriously expose them.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » So we have another scurrilous accusation without a single shred of evidence to back up claims? Well colour me surprised :rolleyes:
6541 wrote: » I don't see how this is going to work. This guy is possibly hostile to Irish culture.https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/life/features/profile-drew-harris-of-the-psni-30600926.htmlhttps://www.independent.ie/irish-news/first-outsider-to-head-up-an-garda-sochna-as-drew-harris-takes-commissioner-role-37051089.html
Del.Monte wrote: » Well, I watched that and the only really bit of sense was spoken by Seamus Mallon - make haste slowly! All the old bull showing a handful of Prods doing Irish dancing gives me the heebie-jeebies and is truly cringeworthy.
DONTMATTER wrote: » You can look up the case if you want. You won't find the files though!
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » You made the claim so the onus is on you to back up your claim with evidence or retract the claim.
steddyeddy wrote: » [/B] I'd suggest moving into this century then. They're religion is inconsequential.