Alaia Itchy Lodge wrote: » I have a Canon 600D and am thinking of an upgrade but dont know if I can go Full Frame Budgets an issue as the money tree in the garden died so it wont be a 5D Mark 4....or a mark 3 for that matter I don't want to change my lenses as I've invested quiet a bit in them over the years. I do landscape mainly. My lenses are Tamron XR Di2 AF 18-200 F3.5-6.3 (IF) Tamron 16-300 F/3.5-6.3 Plezo Drive Tamron USD 150-600 F/5-6.3 Sigma DG 70-300 1.4-5.6 Sigma EX 10-20 1.4-5.6 DC HSM Canon EF-S 18-55 (IS) Canon EF-S 55-250 (IS) Canon 40mm TIA
wersal gummage wrote: » Not an expert, but rarely log in here and saw this... No idea what those tamron and sigma lenses are, but I believe that your ef-s canons won't work on full frame. Your sigma and tamron may be the same if they are designed for crop sensor
draiochtanois wrote: » Why are you considering an upgrade? In what way do you feel you are limited by your current kit?
draiochtanois wrote: » This post has been deleted.
Alaia Itchy Lodge wrote: » My lenses are Tamron XR Di2 AF 18-200 F3.5-6.3 (IF) Tamron 16-300 F/3.5-6.3 Plezo Drive Tamron USD 150-600 F/5-6.3 Sigma DG 70-300 1.4-5.6 Sigma EX 10-20 1.4-5.6 DC HSM Canon EF-S 18-55 (IS) Canon EF-S 55-250 (IS) Canon 40mm TIA
I.Solo. wrote: » Why do you have lenses which cross focal lengths? Personally, I'd recommend you selling them and making your money back and buy F Mount Nikon lenses. You could sell your current rebel camera and lenses on Ebay and buy a D500 which is an absolute must if you're considering upgrading to a better photography camera. Yes, my preference is Nikon, but everyone to their own
I.Solo. wrote: » Your 16-300 makes your 18-55 18-200 55-250 and 70-300 almost redundant. I have the F mount Tamron 18-200 for Nikon, and its a great little lens. For the price of those lenses I've listed, you could sell them as a bundle on Ebay and get 2 new F Mount lens for Nikon should you consider selling your Canon and getting a Nikon D500? I'll never buy another camera again. You can't go wrong, ask anyone who has one.
I.Solo. wrote: » No need to be rude. OP didn't ask for no opinions on Nikon either. So what's the problem?
Alaia Itchy Lodge wrote: » Thanks Did a bit of research last night. All my lenses bar the 150-600 will only work on crop.
Alaia Itchy Lodge wrote: » I'd like something with better sensor /new processor.
magicbastarder wrote: » will a new (FX) body not automatically crop for you on the DX lenses?
Alaia Itchy Lodge wrote: » AS for cross focal length. Its just the way things went. I use my tamron/sigmas more than my kit lenses. Just depends on where I am and what i think I'll see.
challengemaster wrote: » I don't think you're comprehending. You don't need / shouldn't have bought about half of your lenses. You've essentially wasted a heap of money buying lenses that all do the exact same thing. The fact that you can choose from 5 lenses for shooting at 1 focal length isn't good! :pac: Just to give you an example, this is how my own main lenses are in terms of not overlapping Canon EF-S 10-22 Canon 24-70 F/2.8 L Canon 70-200 F/2.8 L If I was going to expand on that, the next one I'd get would be a 300 F4. Personally I'd suggest sorting out your lens collection before changing camera body. Most of what you have while they're fine lenses, they aren't great quality glass - they're all mostly limited at f/3.5-6.3.
Alaia Itchy Lodge wrote: » That's the problem with buying lenses when only starting out. You don't always make the best choices.
challengemaster wrote: » Sure. Again you're kind of missing the point. I didn't really want clarification.SELL. THEM. Figure out which ones you genuinely should keep. My suggestions would be the 10-20, the 40mm prime and the 150-600. Sell everything else and consolidate to 2 quality lenses covering ~20-200mm. Canon or Sigma 24-70 or 24-105 (F2.8 or F4) would be my first suggestion. Sigma also has a 70-200 that's a bit cheaper than the Canon alternative.
Alaia Itchy Lodge wrote: » I got the point. So ok,next question. What are they worth ?
