Benteke wrote: » Donegal letting the country down again, I expect nothing more from the backward county
moloner4 wrote: » Anyone get the name off newstalk from the fella who said the media propaganda made the no side lose? It was so cringy he got cut off.
storker wrote: » They never called me back after the open evening. Gits... _
amcalester wrote: » 100%. If a man doesn’t want a woman aborting his baby then all he has to do is not get her pregnant. It’s pretty simple actually, if he kept it in his pants then there’d be no abortions.
Dookie Monster wrote: » Should be excommunicated. In fact if you have an abortion or help procure one, you are already
WoollyRedHat wrote: » In 3 years, we have made incredible progress as a nation. We have eschewed the notion of a country still haunted by Catholic dogma, and have espoused progressive and social values, have given choice for people to marry whoever we want, regardless of same gender, provided women a choice in pregnancy and autonomy over their own bodies, their womb and we now march forward into 21st century towards social modernization. May we continue to strive as a nation and make this the very best for out people to live in.
wakka12 wrote: » Im very shocked by how many more people seemingly voted yes for this than the marriage referendum, in some counties at least. I thought for sure the number of yes voters would be at most the same number who voted yes in the marriage referendum. What explanation could there be for this?
wakka12 wrote: » 2100 spoiled votes already..christ..how can so many people go wrong drawing an X inside a box
Sheeps wrote: » So nobody shoud ever get pregnant, the continuation of life on Earth is at complete discretion of women.
blueser wrote: » And if you don't mind me asking; who are you to call for people to be excommunicated?
namloc1980 wrote: » That's subject to legislation. Once again a no voter doesn't understand what the referendum was actually about.
Mushy wrote: » Pity the southern towns are in a different constituency, may have swayed it a bit
_Dara_ wrote: » Well, I’ll be honest, I was a Yes voter who thought that there would be a stark urban/rural divide. Delighted to be so wrong!
Dookie Monster wrote: » Morally bankrupt. We can't criticize murder anymore when we have endorsed the murder of our most vulnerable. It's a step too far
WoollyRedHat wrote: » In 3 years, we have made incredible progress as a nation. We have eschewed the notion of a country still haunted by Catholic dogma,.
Sheeps wrote: » If the woman doesn't want to be pregnant she shouldn't be getting pregnant.
Billy86 wrote: » Laois 61.4% YES 38.6% NOWexford 68.4% YES 31.6% NOClare 64.3% YES 35.7% NO This is looking less and less like the rural/urban issue that the No campaign and indeed many corners of the Irish media were trying to tell us it would be.
Amalgam wrote: » If only your Mother would have had the luxury of choice back then, this thread would be shorter for a start..
martingriff wrote: » So all the NO voters share the values of the church and the Iona and the UUP and all YES voters share the idiotic values of the Freemasons?
Dookie Monster wrote: » Cruel and callous. Like the rest of the death cult feminazis
Pherekydes wrote: » What, the body shuts down that whole thing in respect of legitimate rape? :rolleyes:
CruelCoin wrote: » Its more an age/religion thing. 65+ the only age demographic to vote no. Also coincidentally the most religious demographic. The god botherers are dying off and we're loosening up as a result.