Shurimgreat wrote: » I'm hoping the reaction of most Yes voters will be far more mature than this.
Hitman3000 wrote: » I think at this stage you have no idea of what you are trying to say. To describe you as deluded would be a kindness. So I will leave there with you and not engage further.
smokingman wrote: » More mature than calling the women of Ireland "abortion demanders"? More mature than assuming us Irish were somehow ****ing ignorant and thick when it came to biology? More mature than having to spend so much effort correcting lies? Have a good look at yourself gasún. .a good hard look at yourself
Akrasia wrote: » Lads, there are no winners in this referendum.
Shurimgreat wrote: » Will you stop with the "sticking it to the church" nonsense. A large number of No voters have zero time for the Catholic Church. A large number of Yes voters attend mass regularly and will be there blessing themselves next Sunday.
Shurimgreat wrote: Nice evasion there.
Shurimgreat wrote: You only have to read back over this thread and others to see the countless lies spouted by the Yes side.
Hotblack Desiato wrote: » Bollox. There is a massive win for women right now - the constitution no longer states that their life and health is equal to that of a fertilised zygote. That change applies right here, right now.
Hitman3000 wrote: » Yet not able to highlight any of them. What a surprise.
Shurimgreat wrote: Try reading my posting history where I address them.
....... wrote: » This post has been deleted.
_Dara_ wrote: » People be kray kray! :eek:
ArthurDayne wrote: » You are making my very point. People, whether practising Catholics or otherwise, have voted as per their own conscience and not necessarily as per the wishes of the Church (which took a fairly clear view of how people should vote). This is not 'sticking it to the Church' as you have presumptuously claimed -- but is simply a statement of the willingness of the populace to vote on their own accord, even if they continue practising as Catholics. Furthermore, as I have said, a vote in favour of repeal (if it passes) does not impose a view on anyone.
Infini wrote: » Bullshít alert!
realitykeeper wrote: » You won`t have to wait much longer. Divorce, abortion, gay marriage: Sounds like the last days of Sodom and Gomorrah
Hitman3000 wrote: » I did , not impressed.
nacho libre wrote: » We are all doomed. We have become heathens. May God strike us all down for turning our back on him:pac:
The Golden Miller wrote: » I'd be happier of the yes vote winning, if I knew it was based on informed and weighed opinions, but I don't believe the youth on one side spared a second thought for the unborn
Shurimgreat wrote: » Right I'm off to bed!
Infini wrote: » Can't strike anyone down if he don't even come say hello! PS. If God really does exist he's got ALOT of cleaning up to do in the Crazy East cos he's got a whole load of idiots running round declaring "his" work. C_C
Shurimgreat wrote: » Well my question is if people disagree with the church including it seems so many elderly people then why on earth are they still going to mass? Do the decent thing and stop attending mass if you feel so strongly about it. But no they will be at mass next sunday blessing themselves and saying rosaries and the like.
spookwoman wrote: » Looking at a local politicians page who was yes and the no's are going nuts on it. Calling people c**ts etc one woman quoting the bible and on about how she is a christian. Mention religion and no side she starts going on about Christianity is not a religion. The polls have really brought the looney side of the save the 8th out. I wonder did steen, sherlock etc see they were going to loose and this was their reason for pulling out of the debates. Could this be the start of the end for them? Think there was talk of a possible split in the ranks. We can only hope.